Investigator

Claire F. Friedman

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

CFFClaire F. Friedman
Papers(11)
The Intrauterine Devi…High-Sensitivity Muta…Microsatellite Instab…Evaluation of toxicit…The Search for Genomi…Bifunctional Blockade…Assessing the Genomic…Society for Immunothe…Ongoing genome doubli…Tracking clonal evolu…Nivolumab for mismatc…
Collaborators(10)
Britta WeigeltDmitriy ZamarinYulia LakhmanArnaud Da Cruz PaulaQin ZhouAlexia IasonosNicole RuskCarol AghajanianDuaa H. Al-RawiMichael F. Berger
Institutions(2)
Memorial Sloan Ketter…Icahn School of Medic…

Papers

High-Sensitivity Mutation Analysis of Cell-Free DNA for Disease Monitoring in Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Purpose: We sought to determine whether sequencing analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in patients with prospectively accrued endometrial cancer captures the mutational repertoire of the primary lesion and allows for disease monitoring. Experimental Design: Peripheral blood was prospectively collected from 44 newly diagnosed patients with endometrial cancer over a 24-month period (i.e., baseline, postsurgery, every 6 months after). DNA from the primary endometrial cancers was subjected to targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 468 cancer-related genes, and cfDNA to a high-depth NGS assay of 129 genes with molecular barcoding. Sequencing data were analyzed using validated bioinformatics methods. Results: cfDNA levels correlated with surgical stage in endometrial cancers, with higher levels of cfDNA being present in advanced-stage disease. Mutations in cfDNA at baseline were detected preoperatively in 8 of 36 (22%) patients with sequencing data, all of whom were diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, high tumor volume, and/or aggressive histologic type. Of the 38 somatic mutations identified in the primary tumors also present in the cfDNA assay, 35 (92%) and 38 (100%) were detected at baseline and follow-up, respectively. In 6 patients with recurrent disease, changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fraction/variant allele fractions in cfDNA during follow-up closely mirrored disease progression and therapy response, with a lead time over clinically detected recurrence in two cases. The presence of ctDNA at baseline (P < 0.001) or postsurgery (P = 0.014) was significantly associated with reduced progression-free survival. Conclusions: cfDNA sequencing analysis in patients with endometrial cancer at diagnosis has prognostic value, and serial postsurgery cfDNA analysis enables disease and treatment response monitoring. See related commentary by Grant et al., p. 305

Microsatellite Instability–High Endometrial Cancers with MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Have Distinct Molecular and Clinical Profiles

Abstract Purpose: Microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) endometrial carcinomas are underpinned by distinct mechanisms of DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D). We sought to characterize the clinical and genetic features of MSI-H endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic mutations in MMR genes or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1ph). Experimental Design: Of > 1,100 patients with endometrial cancer that underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing, 184 had MSI-H endometrial cancers due to somatic MMR mutations or MLH1ph, or harbored pathogenic germline MMR mutations. Clinicopathologic features, mutational landscape, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) scores were compared among MMR-D groups using nonparametric tests. Log-rank tests were used for categorical associations; Kaplan–Meier method and Wald test based on Cox proportional hazards models were employed for continuous variables and survival analyses. Results: Compared with patients with germline (n = 25) and somatic (n = 39) mutations, patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers (n = 120) were older (P < 0.001), more obese (P = 0.001) and had more advanced disease at diagnosis (P = 0.025). MLH1ph endometrial cancers were enriched for JAK1 somatic mutations as opposed to germline MMR-D endometrial cancers which showed enrichment for pathogenic ERBB2 mutations. MLH1ph endometrial cancers exhibited lower tumor mutational burden and TIL scores compared with endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic MMR mutations (P < 0.01). MLH1ph endometrial cancer patients had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on univariate analysis, but in multivariable models, stage at diagnosis remained the only predictor of survival. For stage I/II endometrial cancer, two-year PFS was inferior for patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers compared with germline and somatic MMR groups (70% vs. 100%, respectively). Conclusions: MLH1ph endometrial cancers likely constitute a distinct clinicopathologic entity compared with germline and somatic MMR-D ECs with potential treatment implications.

Evaluation of toxicity after radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy and post-operative pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for cervical cancer

Compared to historical standards, intensity-modulated radiation therapy minimizes radiation dose to critical structures. Here, we characterize acute/chronic complications of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy following radical surgery for cervical cancer. This single-institution, retrospective study included patients who underwent radical hysterectomy/trachelectomy followed by adjuvant intensity-modulated radiation therapy and radiosensitizing chemotherapy for clinical stage IA to IIA cervical cancer (01/2007-8/2021). Treatment-related adverse events were collected and graded at baseline, 3 weeks, and 5 weeks after intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and long-term (≥6 months). We identified 91 patients who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy following radical hysterectomy (n = 84, 92%) or radical trachelectomy (n = 7, 8%). Post-operatively, 66 patients (73%) met Peters criteria, 21 (23%) met Sedlis criteria, and 4 (4%) had other high-risk features. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy doses were 5040 cGy in 66% (n = 60) of patients, 4500 cGy in 30% (n = 27), and 4500 to 5040 cGy in 4% (n = 4). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (n = 77, 85%) and gastrointestinal (n = 74, 81%), followed by hematologic (n = 26, 29%) and genitourinary (n = 35, 38%). From baseline to intensity-modulated radiation therapy completion, adverse event scores significantly worsened for hematologic (p < .002), fatigue (p < .0001), gastrointestinal (p < .0001), and genitourinary toxicities (p = .003). Acute grade 3 toxicities occurred in 2% (n = 2, gastrointestinal and fatigue). There was one chronic grade 3 toxicity: lymphedema requiring lymphovenous bypass in a patient who underwent full pelvic lymphadenectomy. We observed no long-term grade 3 bowel toxicity or radiation-associated secondary malignancy. Radical hysterectomy/trachelectomy followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy was associated with acceptable rates of acute/chronic toxicity. With modern post-operative intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques, multimodal therapy for apparent stage I cervical cancer is reasonable with a very low rate of severe chronic genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicities. Providers should continue to offer radical surgery for appropriate candidates.

Assessing the Genomic Landscape of Cervical Cancers: Clinical Opportunities and Therapeutic Targets

Abstract Purpose: Tumor genomic profiling is increasingly used to guide treatment strategy in patients with cancer. We integrated tumor genomic, clinical demographic, and treatment response data to assess how prospective tumor-normal sequencing impacted treatment selection in patients with cervical cancer. Experimental Design: Cervical cancers were prospectively analyzed using the MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center – Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) next-generation sequencing panel. Clinical data, including histology, stage at diagnosis, treatment history, clinical trial enrollment and outcomes, date of last follow-up, and survival status were obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 177 patients with cervical cancer (squamous, 69; endocervical adenocarcinoma, 50; gastric type, 22; adenosquamous, 21; and other, 15) underwent MSK-IMPACT testing. The most prevalent genomic alterations were somatic mutations or amplifications in PIK3CA (25%), ERBB2 (12%), KMT2C (10%), and KMT2D (9%). Furthermore, 13% of patients had high tumor mutational burden (TMB &amp;gt;10 mut/Mb), 3 of which were also microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H). Thirty-seven percent of cases had at least one potentially actionable alteration designated as a level 3B mutational event according to the FDA-recognized OncoKB tumor mutation database and treatment classification system. A total of 30 patients (17%) were enrolled on a therapeutic clinical trial, including 18 (10%) who were matched with a study based on their MSK-IMPACT results. Twenty patients (11%) participated in an immune checkpoint inhibition study for metastatic disease; 2 remain progression free at &amp;gt;5 years follow-up. Conclusions: Tumor genomic profiling can facilitate the selection of targeted/immunotherapies, as well as clinical trial enrollment, for patients with cervical cancer.

Nivolumab for mismatch-repair-deficient or hypermutated gynecologic cancers: a phase 2 trial with biomarker analyses

AbstractProgrammed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are approved for therapy of gynecologic cancers with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), although predictors of response remain elusive. We conducted a single-arm phase 2 study of nivolumab in 35 patients with dMMR uterine or ovarian cancers. Co-primary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival at 24 weeks (PFS24). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarkers and molecular correlates of response. The ORR was 58.8% (97.5% confidence interval (CI): 40.7–100%), and the PFS24 rate was 64.7% (97.5% one-sided CI: 46.5–100%), meeting the pre-specified endpoints. The DCR was 73.5% (95% CI: 55.6–87.1%). At the median follow-up of 42.1 months (range, 8.9–59.8 months), median OS was not reached. One-year OS rate was 79% (95% CI: 60.9–89.4%). Thirty-two patients (91%) had a treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), including arthralgia (n = 10, 29%), fatigue (n = 10, 29%), pain (n = 10, 29%) and pruritis (n = 10, 29%); most were grade 1 or grade 2. Ten patients (29%) reported a grade 3 or grade 4 TRAE; no grade 5 events occurred. Exploratory analyses show that the presence of dysfunctional (CD8+PD-1+) or terminally dysfunctional (CD8+PD-1+TOX+) T cells and their interaction with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)+ cells were independently associated with PFS24. PFS24 was associated with presence of MEGF8 or SETD1B somatic mutations. This trial met its co-primary endpoints (ORR and PFS24) early, and our findings highlight several genetic and tumor microenvironment parameters associated with response to PD-1 blockade in dMMR cancers, generating rationale for their validation in larger cohorts.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03241745.

Clinical Trials (1)

NCT06680791Lukas Vanek

Molecular Classification in Relation to Prevention of Endometrial Cancer Recurrence and Lifestyle Factors

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most prevalent cancers in women worldwide with a significantly increasing incidence, especially in developed countries. One of the reasons for the increase in the incidence of this disease is the rising incidence of obesity as the biggest risk factor for the development of this disease. Other important risk factors are hypertension, diabetes mellitus and the general ageing of the population. These risk factors are not only associated with a higher risk of developing the disease, but also, for example, with post-operative complications affecting the quality of life of patients after surgery. The molecular classification of endometrial cancer, which has been introduced into clinical practice in recent years, is currently helping physicians to make treatment decisions for individual patients and predict prognosis. In this project, we would like to focus on the relationship of this molecular classification with genomic mutational signatures detected by whole-exome sequencing and their association with lifestyle risk factors for endometrial cancer (obesity - BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus), including the extent of staging lymphadenectomy. Identification and detailed analysis of dominant mutational profiles associated with a specific molecular subtype of EC and their influence on the presence of lifestyle risk factors may have a major impact on both disease development and prevention of disease recurrence. The possible relationship of the mutational profile with the extent of staging lymphadenectomy may help in deciding the extent of this surgical procedure, which subsequently affects the quality of life of patients, especially in patients with high BMI. Given the widespread prevalence of lifestyle risk factors in the developed world, a detailed understanding of the relationship between the genetic profile, its alterations and the prevalence of these risk factors, with potentially major implications for treatment success, is crutial.

26Works
11Papers
91Collaborators
1Trials
Biomarkers, TumorOvarian NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasms

Positions

2007–

Researcher

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

2011–

Medical Resident

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · Internal Medicine

Education

2011

New York University School of Medicine

Links & IDs
0000-0003-2621-8553

Scopus: 57055084900