Cancers of the ovary, uterus and cervix are often grouped together, but their genomes go wrong in different ways, and that shapes which treatments can work. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) profiled thousands of tumors with the same methods, which makes these differences directly comparable. Here we compare 1,468 tumor samples from its four gynecologic cohorts: ovarian (OV), endometrial (UCEC), cervical (CESC) and uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).
Explore the data: Open the dataset in the Discovery Lab TRE to run reproducible analyses where the data resides.
Dataset page · Open in the Discovery Lab TRE
Key Findings
- Ovarian cancer is driven by copy-number change. Its tumors gain and lose large stretches of chromosomes, more than half of the genome in a typical tumor, while carrying relatively few mutations.
- Endometrial cancer often breaks the other way. Many endometrial tumors carry heavy mutation loads, and a quarter are microsatellite unstable, a form of DNA repair failure that is almost absent from ovarian cancer.
- Ovarian cancer survival remains poor. Half of the TCGA ovarian cancer patients died within 45 months of diagnosis.
The Cohorts
- OV: 585 samples (high-grade serous ovarian cancer).
- UCEC: 529 samples (uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma).
- CESC: 297 samples (cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma).
- UCS: 57 samples (uterine carcinosarcoma).
- Source: cBioPortal's PanCancer Atlas clinical and genomic summaries. The aneuploidy score comes from Taylor et al. (2018) and survival endpoints from the TCGA Clinical Data Resource (Liu et al., 2018).
Papers: Hoadley KA et al. Cell 173, 291–304 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.022 · Liu J et al. Cell 173, 400–416 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.052 · Taylor AM et al. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689 (2018), doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.007