Four versus six chemotherapy cycles in endometrial carcinoma with a high risk of recurrence: a retrospective study
Abstract
Objective
This study compared the survival outcomes and the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events in endometrial cancer patients who received four and six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy to examine the optimal number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles.
Methods
A total of 112 patients with endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence were retrospectively enrolled; 46 patients received four cycles and 66 received six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Between-group differences of overall survival, disease-free survival, hematological and non-hematological toxicities were analyzed. Baseline patient’s background differences were assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score.
Results
Overall and disease-free survivals between the two groups were not significantly different. Paclitaxel + carboplatin, every 3–4 weeks was the most frequently used chemotherapy regimen in both groups. Patients in the six-cycle chemotherapy group developed neutropenia G4 or febrile neutropenia more frequently than those in the four-cycle group; odds ratio (95% confidence interval) is 4.07 (1.51–10.96). Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the most frequently observed non-hematological toxicity; the incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy was not significantly different between four- and six-cycle chemotherapy group, P = 0.832. The result was same in the subgroup analysis in patients who received TC regimen, P = 0.455.
Conclusion
This study implies a possible benefit of fewer cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence because of the lower incidence of hematological toxicities without impairing survival outcomes.