Michinori Mayama

Four versus six chemotherapy cycles in endometrial carcinoma with a high risk of recurrence: a retrospective study

Abstract Objective This study compared the survival outcomes and the incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events in endometrial cancer patients who received four and six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy to examine the optimal number of adjuvant chemotherapy cycles. Methods A total of 112 patients with endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence were retrospectively enrolled; 46 patients received four cycles and 66 received six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Between-group differences of overall survival, disease-free survival, hematological and non-hematological toxicities were analyzed. Baseline patient’s background differences were assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score. Results Overall and disease-free survivals between the two groups were not significantly different. Paclitaxel + carboplatin, every 3–4 weeks was the most frequently used chemotherapy regimen in both groups. Patients in the six-cycle chemotherapy group developed neutropenia G4 or febrile neutropenia more frequently than those in the four-cycle group; odds ratio (95% confidence interval) is 4.07 (1.51–10.96). Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the most frequently observed non-hematological toxicity; the incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy was not significantly different between four- and six-cycle chemotherapy group, P = 0.832. The result was same in the subgroup analysis in patients who received TC regimen, P = 0.455. Conclusion This study implies a possible benefit of fewer cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy in endometrial cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence because of the lower incidence of hematological toxicities without impairing survival outcomes.

Prognostic significance of para-aortic node metastasis in endometrial cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG2043 post hoc analysis

This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALX) and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer (EC) patients at risk of post-operative recurrence. Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 2043 was a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in EC patients at risk for post-operative recurrence. A retrospective analysis included patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLX) alone or both PLX and PALX in JGOG2043. Data on positive lymph nodes and other clinicopathological risk factors were collected. PLX and PALX were performed on 402 patients, while PLX alone was conducted on 250 patients. Evaluating the effect of PALX on survival was challenging through a comparison of the outcomes of the 2 cohorts since PALX was predominantly administered to higher-risk patients. Patients with 2 or more metastases in para-aortic nodes exhibited significantly poorer overall survival than those with no or 1 metastasis, respectively (p<0.001, p=0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that 2 or more metastases in para-aortic nodes is independent risk factors for disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10-2.72; p=0.019) and are marginally significant for overall survival (HR=1.58; 95% CI=0.92-2.72; p=0.096) compared to no or a single metastasis. The clinical relevance of PALX was challenging to evaluate in the JGOG2043 cohort; however, the presence of 2 or more para-aortic node metastases was identified as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in EC patients at risk of recurrence.

Prognostic impact of the number of resected pelvic nodes in endometrial cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG2043 post hoc analysis

This study aimed to determine whether the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) affects the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients at post-operative risk of recurrence. JGOG2043 was a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of three chemotherapeutic regimens as adjuvant therapy in EC patients with post-operative recurrent risk. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in JGOG2043. The number of resected and positive nodes and other clinicopathologic risk factors for survival were retrieved. There were 83 patients in the group with less than 20 PLNs removed (group A), while 167 patients had 20 or more PLNs removed (group B). There was no significant difference in patients' backgrounds between the two groups, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was not significantly different. There was a trend toward fewer pelvic recurrences in group B compared with group A (3.5% vs. 9.6%; p=0.050). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (5-year overall survival [OS]=90.3% vs. 84.3%; p=0.199), multivariate analysis revealed that resection of 20 or more nodes is one of the independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval=0.24-0.99; p=0.048), as well as surgical stage, high-risk histology, and advanced age for OS. Resection of 20 or more PLNs was associated with improved pelvic control and better survival outcomes in EC patients at risk of recurrence who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone and were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.