To examine trends in the use of hormonal therapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and to compare survival outcomes of patients who received traditional chemotherapy, hormonal therapy alone, or the combination of both. Women with stage II to IV low-grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Patients undergoing primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both were included. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with treatment. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards models (via inverse probability of treatment weighting) were applied to compare overall survival across the treatment groups. Among 1532 women, 68.0% received chemotherapy alone, 12.3% received hormonal therapy alone, and 19.8% received combination therapy. Use of hormonal monotherapy increased from 0.8% in 2011 to 27.4% in 2020, and use of combination therapy increased from 0.8% to 32.6% (p < .001 for both). Hormonal therapy alone was more common in older patients (>70 years) (p = .001) and those with Medicare insurance (p < .001), while combination therapy was more common in women with stage III to IV disease (p = .001). After applying propensity score weighing, 5-year survival was 76.6% (95% CI 73.2% to 79.7%) for chemotherapy alone, 85.5% (95% CI 66.1% to 94.3%) for hormonal therapy alone, and 75.8% (95% CI 59.7% to 86.2%) for combination therapy. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the HR for all-cause mortality was 0.74 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.19) for hormonal therapy alone and 0.88 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.24) for combination therapy. In advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer, the use of hormonal therapy increased substantially over time. Comparable survival outcomes across modalities suggest hormonal therapy may be a viable treatment option, particularly for patients who will not tolerate the side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy.