Investigator

Jennifer S. Ferris

Columbia University

JSFJennifer S. Ferris
Papers(2)
Use and outcomes of h…Projected Trends in t…
Collaborators(10)
Jason D WrightLing ChenXiao XuGoli SamimiMatthew PrestNatasha K. StoutNina A BickellStephanie BlankTracy M LayneWilliam D Hazelton
Institutions(7)
Columbia UniversityFudan University Shan…National Cancer Insti…Unknown InstitutionIcahn School Of Medic…Tisch Cancer InstituteFred Hutchinson Cance…

Papers

Use and outcomes of hormonal therapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian cancer.

To examine trends in the use of hormonal therapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and to compare survival outcomes of patients who received traditional chemotherapy, hormonal therapy alone, or the combination of both. Women with stage II to IV low-grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Patients undergoing primary surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or both were included. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine factors associated with treatment. Propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards models (via inverse probability of treatment weighting) were applied to compare overall survival across the treatment groups. Among 1532 women, 68.0% received chemotherapy alone, 12.3% received hormonal therapy alone, and 19.8% received combination therapy. Use of hormonal monotherapy increased from 0.8% in 2011 to 27.4% in 2020, and use of combination therapy increased from 0.8% to 32.6% (p 70 years) (p = .001) and those with Medicare insurance (p < .001), while combination therapy was more common in women with stage III to IV disease (p = .001). After applying propensity score weighing, 5-year survival was 76.6% (95% CI 73.2% to 79.7%) for chemotherapy alone, 85.5% (95% CI 66.1% to 94.3%) for hormonal therapy alone, and 75.8% (95% CI 59.7% to 86.2%) for combination therapy. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the HR for all-cause mortality was 0.74 (95% CI 0.46 to 1.19) for hormonal therapy alone and 0.88 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.24) for combination therapy. In advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian cancer, the use of hormonal therapy increased substantially over time. Comparable survival outcomes across modalities suggest hormonal therapy may be a viable treatment option, particularly for patients who will not tolerate the side effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Projected Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Uterine Cancer in the United States

Abstract Background: To develop a natural history model for uterine cancer calibrated to population-based incidence and mortality data to project future trends in the disease through 2050. Methods: We developed a state-transition microsimulation model of uterine cancer. The model begins at 18 years of age and simulates Black and White patients, includes transition states for precursor lesions, and separately models endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors. The model was calibrated to population-based incidence and mortality data using parameter extrapolation. Results: The model closely fit population-based incidence and mortality data of uterine cancer. From 2020 to 2050, the incidence of uterine cancer is projected to increase in White women to 74.2 cases per 100,000 (compared with 57.7 cases per 100,000 in 2018) and increase to 86.9 per 100,000 (compared with 56.8 cases per 100,000 in 2018) in Black women. Among White women, incidence-based mortality will increase from 6.1 per 100,000 in 2018 to 11.2 per 100,000 in 2050, whereas incidence-based mortality in Black women will increase from 14.1 per 100,000 to 27.9 per 100,000. Endometrioid tumors are expected to increase considerably in both White and Black women; White women will experience only a slight increase in nonendometrioid tumors, whereas the incidence of these tumors will increase substantially in Black women. Conclusions: The incidence and mortality of uterine cancer are projected to increase substantially over the next three decades. Black women will experience a disproportionate increase in the disease. Impact: Projecting the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer can facilitate future cancer control efforts.

2Papers
20Collaborators
Uterine Neoplasms

Positions

Researcher

Columbia University