Yu Xu

Biomarker-driven targeted therapy in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (BRIGHT): protocol for an open-label, multicenter, umbrella study

Platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer has an abysmal prognosis with limited treatment options. Poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP), angiogenesis, and immune checkpoint inhibitors might improve the outcomes of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer, but accurate patient selections for those therapies remain a significant clinical challenge. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biomarker-driven combinatorial therapies of pamiparib, tislelizumab, bevacizumab, and nab-paclitaxel in platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer. A precision medicine combination of PARP inhibitors, anti-angiogenic therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy will improve disease outcomes of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer by accounting for genomic and immunologic features. The BRIGHT Trial is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II, umbrella study planning to enroll 160 patients with serous, endometrioid, or clear cell platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer from 11 clinical centers in China. Patients are assigned to one of three experimental arms based on biomarkers. Patients with Eligible patients include those aged ≥18 with serous, endometrioid, or clear cell ovarian cancer, platinum-resistant recurrence, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigators by the RECIST 1.1 criteria. 160 patients. Recruitment is estimated to be completed by 2024 and results may be published by 2027. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05044871.

Oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of stage I endometrial cancer: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The oncological safety of diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer remains uncertain and conflicting. The aim of the proposed systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarise the available evidence examining the association between diagnostic hysteroscopy and the prognosis of stage Ⅰ endometrial cancer and to statistically synthesise the results of relevant studies. Methods and analysis Systematic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be undertaken using prespecified search strategies. Two authors will independently conduct eligible studies selection process, perform data extraction and appraise the quality of included studies. Original case–control studies, cohort studies and randomised controlled trails published in English will be considered for inclusion. The outcomes of interest will be 5-year recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Meta-analyses will be performed to calculate pooled estimates. Ethics and dissemination Our study will be based on published data, and thus there is no requirement for ethics approval. The results will be shared through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at academic conferences. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020193696.

Natural history of histologically confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy: meta-analysis

Objectives This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis of estimates of the natural history of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) during pregnancy. Setting Studies examining the clinical courses of histologically confirmed high-grade CIN during pregnancy. Participants We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase for eligible studies. Studies were included if they reported the data regarding the natural history of histologically confirmed high-grade CIN during pregnancy. Final estimates were from the meta-analysis of 10 eligible studies. Primary outcome measures The regression rate, persistence rate and progression rate of histologically proven untreated high-grade CIN during pregnancy. Results A total of 10 original studies were included in this meta-analysis. During pregnancy, the regression rate, persistence rate and progression rate of high-grade CIN were 40% (95% CI 35% to 45%), 59% (95% CI 54% to 64%) and 1% (95% CI 0% to 2%), respectively. There was moderate heterogeneity among the studies. The results of the subgroup meta-analysis show that the pooled rates of regression and persistence during pregnancy were 59% (95% CI 54% to 65%) and 40% (95% CI 35% to 45%) for CIN2, and 29% (95% CI 25% to 33%) and 70% (95% CI 65% to 73%) for CIN3. Conclusions During pregnancy, the majority of histologically confirmed high-grade CIN would be persistent or regressed to lower grade CIN or normal. However, it is still worth noting that a small percentage of high-grade CIN would progress to cervical cancer during pregnancy.

Does completion of radical hysterectomy improve oncological outcomes of women with clinical early-stage cervical cancer and intraoperative detection of nodal involvement?: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction The management of women with clinical early-stage cervical cancer and lymph node involvement detected intraoperatively is heterogeneous and controversial. This paper presents the protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the management of this specific population of patients. This proposed study aims to answer the question: does completion of radical hysterectomy improve the oncological outcomes of women with clinical early-stage cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected nodal involvement? Methods and analysis This protocol is drafted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines, and the proposed study will be conducted in accordance with the standard guidelines of ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses’ and ‘Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guideline’. Comprehensive literature searches will be performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. The screening of the eligible studies, the extraction of data of interest, and the quality assessment of the included studies will all be independently performed by different members of our team. The primary outcome of this proposed study will be comparing the risk of recurrence or death from cervical cancer and the risk of all-cause death in patients with two different treatments (completion of radical hysterectomy or abandonment of radical hysterectomy); the secondary outcome of this proposed study will be comparing the risk of the grade 3/4 toxicities associated with the two types of management. Given the clinical heterogeneity among the included studies, data on outcomes will be pooled by random-effects models. Heterogeneity will be evaluated using the I2 statistic. The risk of bias for the included studies will be evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Cochrane collaboration’s tool. The grade of evidence will be evaluated by two independent members of our team using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required because there will no primary data collected. The findings of this proposed study will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021273527.

Biomarker-driven Targeted Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Platinum-resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

This study is an open-label, multicenter, umbrella study aimed to evaluate the combined, biomarker-driven, targeted treatment efficiency of Pamiparib, Bevacizumab, Tislelizumab, and Nab-paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (PROC).