Shira Peleg Hasson

The impact of inter-cycle treatment delays on overall survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer

Abstract Introduction Chemotherapy forms the cornerstone of systemic treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, extending overall survival; however, drug-related toxicity can lead to treatment delays, potentially diminishing treatment efficacy. This study evaluated the impact of treatment delays on all-cause mortality of patients with ovarian cancer, to better inform decisions on patient management. Methods This retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1517 women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer, receiving first-line adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 2014 and 2015. The frequency of inter-cycle delays >7 days was calculated using drug administration dates. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to compare 2-year overall survival (OS) between patients who were delayed and those treated to schedule. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to investigate the impact of treatment delay on all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity scores were used to adjust for confounding variables. Results Delays >7 days occurred in 35.3% of patients. Two-year OS probability was 62.7% in patients who experienced treatment delays >7 days (95% CI, 58.7-66.9) compared to 69.1% in those treated to schedule (95% CI, 66.2-72.0). Delays were not significantly associated with all-cause mortality when adjusted for confounders (HR 1.00 95% CI, 0.83-1.20, P = .9). Conclusions Delays to chemotherapy treatment were not significantly associated with worsened survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. These results can inform clinical decision making that prioritize toxicity management and quality of life for those treated with chemotherapy.

Medical cannabis and its effect on oncological outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer treated with PARP inhibitors

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) play a pivotal role in ovarian cancer management. With medical cannabis emerging as a novel component of supportive care, this study investigated the impact of medical cannabis use on oncological outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing PARPi therapy. The study included patients from a single institution database treated for ovarian cancer between January 2014 and January 2020 who received PARPi maintenance therapy in a first-line or recurrent disease setting after a confirmed response to platinum-based treatment. The study categorized patients as cannabis users and cannabis-naïve. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to assess the effects of medical cannabis use on the duration of PARPi therapy, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Among the eligible patients (n=93), most were cannabis-naïve (69%, n=64) while the rest used medical cannabis (31%, n=29). Medical cannabis use rates were comparable for patients receiving PARPi therapy post-primary treatment or for recurrence (42%, n=9, vs 27%, n=20; p=0.1). Both groups exhibited similar median duration for PARPi therapy (12.1 vs 9.5 months; p=0.89) and progression-free survival (20 vs 21 months; p=0.83). Kaplan-Meier analysis detected no differences in progression-free survival associated with cannabis use. Although cannabis users had an extended overall survival compared with the cannabis-naïve group (129.3 vs 99 months; p=0.03), cannabis use was insignificant for overall survival on multivariate analysis (p=0.10). Multivariate analysis showed stage IV at diagnosis (p=0.02) to be the sole factor associated with progression-free survival (p=0.02). Medical cannabis usage in patients receiving PARPi treatment showed no association with duration of PARPi therapy, progression-free survival, or overall survival.

Effect of BMI change on recurrence risk in patients with endometrial cancer

Our study aimed to explore the effect of body mass index (BMI) change on cancer recurrence risk during the routine surveillance of endometrial cancer patients. Data on patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma that had a staging procedure and continued follow-up was retrospectively collected. We compared patients' BMI at time of surgery and during the last clinic follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the effect of predictors on BMI change and the risk of recurrence. A total of 211 patients were included in the final analysis. The majority of patients had stage I disease (n=176, 89%) and endometrioid histology (n=178, 86%). Median follow-up time was 53.4 (standard deviation (SD) 40) months. The mean BMI was 30.4 kg/m2 (interquartile range (IQR) 25-34) at surgery compared with 30.9 kg/m2 (IQR 26-36) at last follow-up (p<0.001). The BMI increase was most pronounced in patients with endometroid histology that recurred, 31.6 (IQR 24-35) kg/m Patients with endometroid endometrial cancer that had an increase in BMI during follow-up were at an increased risk for cancer recurrence compared with patients that did not change or had a decrease in BMI.

Top advances of the year: Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer

AbstractIn the past year, notable advances were achieved toward improving oncological outcomes in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer because of reporting of high‐level results of several phase 3 clinical trial combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with chemotherapy in the first‐line setting. For the first time, patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer have options for treatment that are superior to traditional chemotherapy alone. What remains to be determined is population specificity of these recommendations. All four major studies were in agreement that patients with endometrial cancer with deficient mismatch repair markedly benefited from addition of an immune checkpoint inhibitor for progression‐free survival; some showed preliminary results demonstrating a potential overall survival. Molecular characterization details are needed to determine if and which patients with tumors that are mismatch proficient should receive this new combination approach.Plain Language Summary Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with chemotherapy in the first‐line setting treatment of patients with advanced endometrial cancer improved progression‐free survival, especially in patients with mismatch repair deficiency. Improving patient selection with potential biomarkers of sensitivity and biomarkers of resistance is key in developing the next clinical trials and will assist in directing therapy to the correct patients and minimize toxicity.

De-escalating first-line treatment in stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer: outcomes of immunotherapy alone and systemic review

Abstract Introduction Chemo-immunotherapy (IO) is the preferred first-line treatment for stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer. However, limited data exist on the efficacy and safety of using IO-alone as a de-escalation strategy. We report outcomes from a case series of selected patients treated with IO-alone and review the feasibility of de-escalating first-line treatment. Methods The authors conducted a literature review using Google Scholar and PubMed to identify reports using IO-alone as a de-escalation strategy across malignancies published between 1999 and December 2024 and also reviewed a cervical cancer database from a tertiary academic to identify patients with stage IVB or recurrent disease treated with IO-alone. The authors used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Among 582 patients treated between 2015 and 2021, 18 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 43 years (range 28-84); 67% had squamous cell carcinoma, 11% adenocarcinoma, and 80% expressed PD-L1. CPS scores were &amp;lt;1 in 20%, 1--10 in 33%, and &amp;gt;10 in 47%. Most patients had oligo-metastatic disease (83%). Treatment with IO-alone began a median of 7 months after platinum-based chemotherapy. Indications included prior adjuvant (44%) or neoadjuvant (22%) chemotherapy, clinical trial participation (11%), or patient preference (22%). Median PFS and OS were 27 months and 82 months, respectively. Conclusions These findings support the need for clinical trials evaluating IO-alone as a first-line treatment option for de-escalation in stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer. Biomarker development is needed to better identify candidates for personalized therapy.

Brain metastases in patients with ovarian cancer

Brain metastasis (BM) are uncommon among women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The frequency, risk factors and clinical repercussions of BM in these patients are not well described. We retrospectively evaluated EOC patients treated at our center from 2002 to 2020 and assessed their clinical parameters, risk for BM development and association with overall survival (OS). This cohort has a known high frequency of BRCA mutation carriers ( Among 1035 EOC patients, 29 (2.8%) were diagnosed with BM. The prevalence of BM are rare among EOC patients. However, the risk is three-fold higher among patients with