Investigator

Sang-Soo Seo

National Cancer Center

SSSang-Soo Seo
Papers(6)
The pathologic and cl…How to manage synchro…The survival effect o…Adherence of PARP inh…Survival Effects of C…Effect of addition of…
Collaborators(10)
Sokbom KangMyong Cheol LimSang-Yoon ParkJi Hyun KimWonkyo ShinYoun Jee KimYumi LeeByoung-Gie KimChel Hun ChoiChong Woo Yoo
Institutions(5)
National Cancer CenterSeoul National Univer…Pukyong National Univ…Sungkyunkwan Universi…Samsung Medical Center

Papers

How to manage synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer patients?

Abstract Backgrounds We aimed to evaluate the prognosis in patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) by comparing the differences between double primary cancer (DPC) and metastatic cancer (MC). Methods The medical records of 47 patients diagnosed synchronously with endometrial and ovarian cancer between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-eight and 19 patients were diagnosed with DPC and MC, respectively. Demographics, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) were compared. The clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The demographics were not different between both groups. Endometrioid histology and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade were higher in the MC group than in the DPC group (42.1% vs. 10.7%; P = 0.018, P = 0.002, respectively). The ratio of post-operative adjuvant therapy was not different in both groups. Recurrence occurred in five patients with DPC and seven with MC. The difference in RFS was not significantly different (P = 0.131) but the OS was different between both groups (P = 0.020). Histology and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were associated wtih RFS in univariate analysis, but no difference was found in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Although DPC patients had longer OS, multivariate analysis did not identify any influential factors. Focus should be placed on defining the appropriate adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients, which will improve prognosis, rather than on discriminating between DPC and MC.

The survival effect of ovary preservation in early stage endometrial cancer: a single institution retrospective analysis

Abstract Purpose We investigated the effect of ovary preserving surgery in early International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) stage endometrial cancer patients. Methods Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 539 patients who were diagnosed with early stage endometrial cancer between Jan 2006 and Dec 2017. Patients were categorized into ovary preservation and ovary removal groups. Demographics, recurrence free survival (RFS), and five-year overall survival (OS) rate were compared, and the clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results The median follow-up period was 85 months (range, 6–142 months), and the median age was 52.7 years. The mean age was higher in the ovary removal group than in the ovary preservation group (54.4 vs 40.94 years; P  < 0.001). The ovary preservation group showed an earlier FIGO stage than the ovary removal group ( P  = 0.0264). There was a greater incidence of adjuvant chemotherapy administration in the removal group. There were no statistical differences in other baseline characteristics. When comparing the RFS and OS rates, there were no statistical differences between the preservation and removal groups. (recurrence free rate 98.5% vs 92.7%, p = 0.4360 , and 5-year survival rate 98.6% vs 93.0%, p = 0.0892 , respectively). Endometrioid histology ( p = 0.006 ) and post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy ( p = 0.0062 ) were related to OS, and adjuvant chemotherapy ( p < 0.001 ) and radiotherapy ( p = 0.005 ) were related to RFS. Conclusions Ovary preservation in early stage endometrial cancer is worth considering, as it does not affect survival in early stage endometrial cancer patients.

Effect of addition of bevacizumab to chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed stage IVB cervical cancer: a single institution experience in Korea

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of chemoradiotherapy with or without bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB cervical cancer. 41 patients with stage IVB cervical cancer who underwent chemoradiotherapy between August 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. This study included 11 patients who received bevacizumab before or after radiotherapy (group A) and 30 patients who received conventional chemoradiotherapy without bevacizumab (group B). We excluded the following patients: those with dual primary cancers; those whose pathologic diagnosis was neither squamous cell carcinoma nor adenocarcinoma; those who did not undergo radiotherapy; or those from whom follow-up data could not be collected. We analyzed the treatment responses, toxicities, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates. A total of 41 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-108). The response rates at 3 months after treatment were 90.9% in group A and 83.3% in group B (p=0.54). After completing all treatments, the complete response rates were 81.8% in group A and 47% in group B (p=0.04). Grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicities, including bleeding, fistula, perforation, and obstruction, were more frequent in group A (54.5%) than in group B (6.7%) (p=0.003). The 12 month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were similar in both arms (12 month progression-free survival: 45.5% vs 46.7%, respectively, p=0.22; 12 month overall survival: 81.8% vs 72.9%, respectively, p=0.57). Patients with node-only metastasis had better 12 month progression-free survival in group B than in group A (59.1% vs 42.9%, respectively, p=0.04). However, the responses to both treatments did not differ in patients with organ metastasis. Bevacizumab for stage IVB cervical cancer is associated with higher complete response rates. However, patients treated with bevacizumab experienced more bowel toxicities. Bevacizumab did not improve progression-free survival among patients with node-only metastasis.

6Papers
18Collaborators
1Trials
Ovarian NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalDisease-Free SurvivalNeoplasm GradingUterine Cervical Neoplasms