Renaud Sabatier

PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer after platinum-sensitive recurrence: real-world experience from the Unicancer network

Abstract Background Based on results of randomized clinical trials, polyADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have become the standard of care in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OvC) in patients responding to platinum chemotherapy. However, little is known about their impact on survival in a real-world setting. Patients and methods This retrospective French multicenter observational study included women with platinum-sensitive recurrent OvC (not limited to the first platinum-sensitive relapse) receiving PARPi as maintenance after response to platinum-based chemotherapy. They were compared to patients with similar characteristics undergoing observation after chemotherapy completion. Data were collected in the Ovarian Cancer Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME-OC) database between 2011 and 2021. We explored progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits with PARPi maintenance. Results One hundred and twenty-three patients matching the selection criteria were included in the PARPi group and 397 patients in the control group. Median PFS was 19.9 months (95CI [15.0-21.9]) in the PARPi group vs 13.4 months (95CI [11.8-15.0]) in the control group, with a HR = 0.71 (95CI [0.55-0.93]), P = .01). Median OS was 82.0 months (95CI [48.6-Not Estimable]) in the PARPi group vs 44.7 months (95CI [38.8-53.7]) in the control group (HR = 0.47, 95CI [0.30-0.74], P < .001). Multivariate analyses including performance status, histological subtype, achievement of cytoreductive surgery at relapse, and platinum-free interval, confirmed the independent prognostic impact of PARPi treatment. Conclusion This first national study focusing on the efficacy of PARPi in a real-world population shows similar benefits than in randomized clinical trials, supporting their use in clinical routine practice. Database registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03275298.

Deciphering Folate Receptor alphaGene Expression and mRNA Signatures in Ovarian Cancer: Implications for Precision Therapies

Antibody–drug conjugates targeting folate receptor alpha (FRα) are a promising treatment for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC) with high FRα expression. Challenges persist in accurately assessing FRα expression levels. Our study aimed to better elucidate FRα gene expression and identify mRNA signatures in OC. We pooled OC gene expression data from 16 public datasets, encompassing 1832 OC and 30 normal ovarian tissues. Additional data included DNA copy number and methylation data from TCGA and protein data from 363 cancer cell lines from the Broad Institute Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia. FOLR1 mRNA expression was significantly correlated with protein expression in pan-cancer cell lines and ovarian cancer cell lines. FOLR1 expression was higher in OC samples than in normal ovarian tissues (OR = 3.88, p = 6.97 × 10−12). Patients with high FOLR1 expression were more likely to be diagnosed with serous histology, FIGO stage III–IV, and high-grade tumors; however, nearly similar percentages of patients with low FOLR1 expression were also diagnosed with these features. FOLR1 mRNA expression was not correlated with platinum sensitivity or complete surgery, nor with prognosis. However, we identified a 187-gene signature associated with high FOLR1 expression that was significantly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.71, p = 1.18 × 10−6), independently from clinicopathological features. We identified a gene expression signature correlated to high FRα expression and OC prognosis, which may be used to refine therapeutic strategies targeting FRα in OC. These findings warrant validation in larger cohorts.

Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma landscape: pathological and molecular characterization

Endometrioid ovarian cancers (EOvC) are usually managed as serous tumors. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive molecular investigation to uncover the distinct biological characteristics of EOvC. This retrospective multicenter study involved patients from three European centers. We collected clinical data and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) samples for analysis at the DNA level using panel‐based next‐generation sequencing and array‐comparative genomic hybridization. Additionally, we examined mRNA expression using NanoString nCounter® and protein expression through tissue microarray. We compared EOvC with other ovarian subtypes and uterine endometrioid tumors. Furthermore, we assessed the impact of molecular alterations on patient outcomes, including progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Preliminary analysis of clinical data from 668 patients, including 86 (12.9%) EOvC, revealed more favorable prognosis for EOvC compared with serous ovarian carcinoma (5‐year OS of 60% versus 45%; P  = 0.001) driven by diagnosis at an earlier stage. Immunohistochemistry and copy number alteration (CNA) profiles of 43 cases with clinical data and FFPE samples available indicated that EOvC protein expression and CNA profiles were more similar to endometrioid endometrial tumors than to serous ovarian carcinomas. EOvC exhibited specific alterations, such as lower rates of PTEN loss, mutations in DNA repair genes, and P53 abnormalities. Survival analysis showed that patients with tumors harboring loss of PTEN expression had worse outcomes (median PFS 19.6 months vs. not reached; P  = 0.034). Gene expression profile analysis confirmed that EOvC differed from serous tumors. However, comparison to other rare subtypes of ovarian cancer suggested that the EOvC transcriptomic profile was close to that of ovarian clear cell carcinoma. Downregulation of genes involved in the PI3K pathway and DNA methylation was observed in EOvC. In conclusion, EOvC represents a distinct biological entity and should be regarded as such in the development of specific clinical approaches.

Safety and quality of life with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients with ovarian cancer: subgroup analysis of PAOLA‑1/ENGOT-ov25

Abstract Background In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1. Methods Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs <70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered. Results Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, −0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [−0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34). Conclusion Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).

Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Are Associated with Enhanced Macrophage Activation and Immune Checkpoint Expression and Predict Outcome in Cervical Cancer

Abstract Cervical tumors are usually treated using surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy and would benefit from immunotherapies. However, the immune microenvironment in cervical cancer remains poorly described. Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) were recently described as markers for better immunotherapy response and overall better prognosis in patients with cancer. We evaluated the cervical tumor immune microenvironment, specifically focusing on TLS, using combined high-throughput phenotyping, soluble factor concentration dosage in the tumor microenvironment, and spatial interaction analyses. We found that TLS presence was associated with a more inflammatory soluble microenvironment, with the presence of B cells as well as more activated macrophages and dendritic cells (DC). Furthermore, this myeloid cell activation was associated with the expression of immune checkpoints, such as PD-L1 and CD40, and the proximity of activated conventional type 2 DCs to CD8+ T cells, indicating better immune interactions and tumor control. Finally, we associated TLS presence, greater B-cell density, and activated DC density with improved progression-free survival, substantiating TLS presence as a potential prognostic marker. Our results provide evidence that TLS presence denotes cell activation and immunotherapy target expression.

The influence of time and implants in high-dose rate image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

To compare the clinical outcomes of two different schedules of modern image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in patients underwent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer treated (LACC) METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from medical records of all consecutive patients with histologically proven cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 stage IB-IVA) treated by HDR-BT after CCRT at our institution between 2016 and 2021 were reviewed. Two hundred and 8 patients with LACC FIGO 2018 stages (IB 20.7%; II 26.5%, III 51%, IVA 1.9%) underwent brachytherapy at our institution. Depending on initial clinical features of disease and the clinical response to CCRT, HDR-BT was delivered with one implant (BT1i) or two implants (BT2i) in 39% and 61% of patients respectively. FIGO stages (≥IIB) were 63% vs. 78% for BT1i and BT2i patient group respectively. Combined brachytherapy technique [endocavitary/interstitial (IC/IS)] was required in 14.8% vs. 68.5% for BT1i and BT2i respectively. With a median follow-up of 32.5 months (95% confidence interval, [29.7-35.8]), local relapse was observed in sixteen patients: 8 patients (3.8%) had local (exclusive) relapse and 8 patients (3.8%) had locally persistent and progressive disease, without significant difference for each BT modality group (p = 0.27), even if BT2i group had more aggressive initial disease. The estimated 3-year disease free survival and overall survival for the entire population was 69% (95% confidence interval, [62-75%]) and 88% (95% confidence interval, [82-92%]) respectively. There was a significant difference in the incidence of global toxicity grade G≥2 in favour to the BT2i group (p = 0.026). HDR brachytherapy delivered with a long time interval between fractions, two implants, and combined IC/IS brachytherapy is the best way to ensure local control and to perform IGABT with low toxicity, even in advanced stages of disease.

Efficacy and safety of maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer patients aged ≥65 years from the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

The phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 study (NCT02477644) showed that addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We evaluated maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients in PAOLA-1. Baseline clinical and molecular data, and PFS, were compared between older (aged ≥65 years) and younger patients (<65 years). Factors associated with olaparib efficacy, and safety in age subgroups, were also assessed. Of 806 randomised patients, 292 (36.2%) were ≥65 years. A lower proportion of older versus younger patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (61.0% versus 76.2%) and upfront surgery (42.0% versus 55.7%). Older patients were less likely to have a BRCA1/2 mutation (17.1% versus 36.7%) or homologous recombination deficiency-positive status (34.1% versus 55.7%). After median follow-up of 22.1 months, median PFS was 21.6 months with olaparib versus 16.6 months with placebo in the older population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.75), comparable with the younger population (median 22.9 versus 16.9 months; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77). PFS benefits were observed in patients with a BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumours. Incidence of olaparib-related grade ≥3 adverse events in older patients was comparable with that of younger patients (36.8% versus 31.7%) although hypertension and anaemia were more common in older patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred in older patients receiving olaparib. Older patients enrolled in PAOLA-1 achieved similar PFS benefits compared with younger patients, with a similar safety profile.

Atezolizumab Combined With Platinum and Maintenance Niraparib for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer With a Platinum-Free Interval &gt;6 Months: ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA Phase III Trial

PURPOSE To evaluate atezolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) followed by maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS The multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03598270 ) enrolled patients with measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one or two previous CT lines (most recent including platinum) and had a treatment-free interval since last platinum (TFIp) of &gt;6 months. Patients were stratified by investigator-selected carboplatin doublet, TFIp, BRCA status, and PD-L1 status in de novo biopsy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab or placebo throughout standard therapy comprising six cycles of a carboplatin doublet followed (in patients with response/stable disease) by maintenance niraparib until progression. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS Between November 2018 and January 2022, 417 patients were randomly assigned (15% BRCA- mutated, 36% PD-L1–positive, 66% TFIp &gt;12 months, 11% previous poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor after frontline CT, and 53% previous bevacizumab). Median follow-up was 28.6 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 30.5 months). Atezolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.10]; P = .28). Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 12.1 months) with atezolizumab versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.2 months) with standard therapy. Subgroup analyses generally showed consistent results, including analyses by PD-L1 status. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 39 to 52) with atezolizumab and 43% (95% CI, 36 to 49) with standard therapy. The safety profile was as expected from previous experience of these drugs. CONCLUSION Combining atezolizumab with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer did not significantly improve PFS or the ORR.

Surgical approach and maintenance therapy in advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer: Insights from the French ESME database

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is a rare sub-type characterized by indolent growth, limited therapeutic options, and relative chemoresistance. This study aimed to describe management patterns, survival outcomes, and the efficacy of systemic therapies in a large cohort of patients with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma treated across 18 French comprehensive cancer centers. Using data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics ovarian cancer database (NCT03275298), patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III to IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma diagnosed between 2011 and 2024 were examined. Clinical outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival were assessed, along with treatment-related factors affecting survival, including surgical management and bevacizumab administration. Univariable and multi-variable analyses were conducted using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 230 patients with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (median age 55.5 years [range; 19.8-88.2]), 171 (74.3%) and 59 (25.7%) had FIGO stage III and IV diseases, respectively. Primary debulking surgery was performed in 128 (55.6%), platinum-based chemotherapy was given to 223 (97%), and bevacizumab was administered to 79 (34.3%) patients. The median follow-up period was 73.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 69.9 to 80.0). Patients who underwent primary debulking surgery had the longest median progression-free survival (35.2 months, 95% CI 26.5 to 48.1) and overall survival (146 months, 95% CI 110.4 to not reached). Multi-variable analyses identified FIGO stage and primary debulking surgery as key prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas age and bevacizumab use were not significantly associated with outcomes. This real-world study underscores the prognostic relevance of surgical approach and disease stage in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Continued investigation is warranted to define the optimal integration of emerging systemic therapies and improve outcomes in this rare malignancy.

Platinum-based Chemotherapy With Atezolizumab and Niraparib in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Atezolizumab in this study is expected to have a positive benefit-risk profile for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer. Of interest, atezolizumab is being investigated also in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in second line (2L)/ third line (3L) platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients in ATALANTE (NCT02891824), which also includes bevacizumab in the combination. The study is proceeding as expected after \>100 patients enrolled and under independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) supervision. Platinum-containing therapy is considered the treatment of choice for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse. However the duration of response and the prolongation of the progression free interval with chemotherapy are usually brief, among other because these chemotherapy regimens cannot be continued until progression as they are associated with neurological, renal and hematological toxicity and cannot generally be tolerated for more than about 6 to 9 cycles. Niraparib received FDA approval in March 2017 as maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has also approved niraparib as maintenance monotherapy. Despite the progress brought about by niraparib, there is a need for a more effective treatment to extend the progression free interval in this patient population. The combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-death protein 1 (anti-PD1) or anti-death protein ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) has a compelling rationale to this aim, especially under the light of the emerging clinical data of this combination. The use of atezolizumab concurrent to platinum-containing chemotherapy followed by niraparib as maintenance therapy after completion of chemotherapy, as per normal clinical practice, may provide further benefit to patients in terms of prolonging the progression free interval and increasing the interval between lines of chemotherapy, hence delaying further hospitalization and the cumulative toxicities associated with chemotherapy. Additionally, preliminary studies with atezolizumab suggest an acceptable tolerability profile for long term clinical use in recurrent ovarian cancer patients and other indications.

Evolution of the Therapeutic Care in Ovarian Cancer From 2011

The ESME Ovarian Cancer database is a multi-center real life database using a retrospective data collection process in 18 French Comprehensive Cancer Center (FCCC) over 20 sites). This database compiles data from existing data available from patient's electronic medical records (EMR).

Platine, Avastin and OLAparib in 1st Line

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Olaparib vs. Placebo in Patients with Advanced FIGO Stage IIIB - IV High Grade Serous or Endometrioid Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer treated with standard First-Line Treatment, Combining Platinum-Taxane Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab Concurrent with Chemotherapy and in Maintenance.