Platine, Avastin and OLAparib in 1st Line

NCT02477644CompletedPHASE3INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Arcagy Research

Enrollment

806

Start Date

2015-05-06

Completion Date

2019-03-22

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial Olaparib vs. Placebo Patients With Advanced FIGO Stage IIIB-IV High Grade Serious or Endometrioid Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer Treated Standard First-Line Treatment

Interventions

OlaparibPlacebo

Conditions

Ovarian Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

I-1. Female Patient must be ≥18 years of age. I-2. Signed informed consent and ability to comply with treatment and follow-up.

I-3. Patient with newly diagnosed I-3-1 Ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal cancer and/or fallopian-tube cancer,

I-3-2 Histologically confirmed (based on local histopathological findings):

* high grade serous or
* high grade endometrioid or
* other epithelial non mucinous ovarian cancer in a patient with germline BRCA 1 or 2 deleterious mutation I-3-3 at an advanced stage: FIGO stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV of the 1988 FIGO classification.

I-4. Patient who has completed prior to randomization first line platinum-taxane chemotherapy:

1. Platinum-taxane based regimen must have consisted of a minimum of 6 treatment cycles and a maximum of 9. However if platinum based therapy must be discontinued early as a result of non hematological toxicity specifically related to the platinum regimen, (i.e. neurotoxicity, hypersensitivity etc.), patient must have received a minimum of 4 cycles of the platinum regimen.
2. Intravenous, intraperitoneal, or neoadjuvant platinum based chemotherapy is allowed; for weekly therapy, three weeks are considered one cycle. Interval debulking is allowed.

I-5. Patient must have received prior to randomization a minimum of 3 cycles of bevacizumab in combination with the 3 last cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Only in case of interval debulking surgery, it is allowed to realize only 2 cycles of bevacizumab in combination with the last 3 cycles of platinium-based chemotherapy. Bevacizumab treatment should be administered at a dose 15mg/kg q3 weeks up to a total of 15 months.

I-6. Patient must be prior to randomization without evidence of disease (NED) or in complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) from her first line treatment. There should be no clinical evidence of disease progression (physical exam, imagery, CA 125) throughout her first line treatment and prior to study randomization.

I-7. Patient must be randomized at least 3 weeks and no more than 9 weeks after her last dose of chemotherapy (last dose is the day of the last infusion) and all major toxicities from the previous chemotherapy must have resolved to CTC AE grade 1 or better (except alopecia and peripheral neuropathy).

I-8. Patient must have normal organ and bone marrow function:

1. Hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL.
2. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L.
3. Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L.
4. Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN).
5. Aspartate aminotransferase /Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (ASAT/SGOT)) and Alanine aminotransferase /Serum Glutamic Pyruvate Transaminase (ALAT/SGPT)) ≤ 2.5 x ULN, unless liver metastases are present in which case they must be ≤ 5 x ULN.
6. Serum creatinine ≤ 1.25 x institutional ULN and creatinine clearance \> 50 mL/min.
7. Patient not receiving anticoagulant medication who has an International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤1.5 and an Activated ProThrombin Time (aPTT) ≤1.5 x ULN.

   The use of full-dose oral or parenteral anticoagulants is permitted as long as the INR or APTT is within therapeutic limits (according to site medical standard). If the patient is on oral anticoagulants, dose has to be stable for at least two weeks at the time of randomization.
8. Urine dipstick for proteinuria \< 2+. If urine dipstick i s ≥2+, 24-hour urine must demonstrate \<1 g of protein in 24 hours.
9. Normal blood pressure or adequately treated and controlled hypertension (systolic BP ≤ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≤ 90 mmHg).

I-9. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1. I-10. Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor sample from the primary cancer must be available for central BRCA testing and test result must be available for stratification.

I-11. Postmenopausal or evidence of non-childbearing status for women of childbearing potential prior to the first dose of study treatment. (see appendix 4) I-12. For France only: In France, a subject will be eligible for randomization in this study only if either affiliated to, or a beneficiary of, a social security category.

Exclusion Criteria:

E-1. Non-epithelial origin of the ovary, the fallopian tube or the peritoneum (i.e. germ cell tumors).

E-2. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (e.g. borderline tumors), or mucinous carcinoma.

E-3. Patient with synchronous primary endometrial cancer unless both of the following criteria are met:

1. stage \< II,
2. Less than 60 years old at the time of diagnosis of endometrial cancer with stage IA or IB grade 1 or 2, or stage IA grade III endometrioid adenocarcinoma OR ≥ 60 years old at the time of diagnosis of endometrial cancer with stage IA grade 1 or 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Patient with serous or clear cell adenocarcinoma or carcinosarcoma of the endometrium is not eligible.

E-4. Other malignancy within the last 5 years except: adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer curatively treated in situ cancer of the cervix, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Patient with a history of localized malignancy diagnosed over 5 years ago may be eligible provided she completed her adjuvant systemic therapy prior to randomization and that the patient remains free of recurrent or metastatic disease.

Patient with history of primary triple negative breast cancer may be eligible provided she completed her definitive anticancer treatment more than 3 years ago and she remains breast cancer disease free prior to start of study treatment.

E-5. Patient with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia history E-6. Patient having experienced for at least one cycle, a delay \> 2 weeks due to prolonged hematological recovery during the first line chemotherapy E-7. Patient receiving radiotherapy within 6 weeks prior to study treatment E-8. Major surgery within 4 weeks of starting study treatment and patient must have recovered from any effects of any major surgery E-9. Previous allergenic bone marrow transplant. E-10. Any previous treatment with PARP inhibitor, including olaparib. E-11. Administration of other simultaneous chemotherapy drugs, any other anticancer therapy or anti-neoplastic hormonal therapy, or simultaneous radiotherapy during the trial treatment period (hormonal replacement therapy is permitted as are steroidal antiemetics).

E-12. Current or recent (within 10 days prior to randomization) chronic use of aspirin \> 325 mg/day.

E-13. Concomitant use of known potent CYP3A4 inhibitors such as ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir, indinavir, saquinavir, telithromycin, clarithromycin and nelfinavir.

E-14. Prior history of hypertensive crisis (CTC-AE grade 4) or hypertensive encephalopathy.

E-15. Clinically significant (e.g. active) cardiovascular disease, including:

1. Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within ≤ 6 months of randomization,
2. New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ grade 2congestive heart failure (CHF).
3. Poorly controlled cardiac arrhythmia despite medication (patient with rate controlled atrial fibrillation are eligible), or any clinically significant abnormal finding on resting ECG,
4. Peripheral vascular disease grade ≥ 3 (e.g. symptomatic and interfering with activities of daily living \[ADL\] requiring repair or revision).

E-16. Previous Cerebro-Vascular Accident (CVA), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) or Sub- Arachnoids Hemorrhage (SAH) within 6 months prior to randomization.

E-17. History or evidence of hemorrhagic disorders within 6 months prior to randomization.

E-18. Evidence of bleeding diathesis or significant coagulopathy (in the absence of coagulation).

E-19. History or clinical suspicion of brain metastases or spinal cord compression. CT/MRI of the brain is mandatory (within 4 weeks prior to randomization) in case of suspected brain metastases. Spinal MRI is mandatory (within 4 weeks prior to randomization) in case of suspected spinal cord compression.

E-20. History or evidence upon neurological examination of central nervous system (CNS) disease, unless adequately treated with standard medical therapy (e.g. uncontrolled seizures).

E-21. Significant traumatic injury during 4 weeks prior to randomization. E-22. Non-healing wound, active ulcer or bone fracture. Patient with granulating incisions healing by secondary intention with no evidence of facial dehiscence or infection is eligible but require 3 weekly wound examinations.

E-23. History of VEGF therapy related abdominal fistula or gastrointestinal perforation or active gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months prior to the first study treatment.

E-24. Current, clinically relevant bowel obstruction, including sub-occlusive disease, related to underlying disease.

E-25. Patient with evidence of abdominal free air not explained by paracentesis or recent surgical procedure.

E-26. Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or puts the patient at high risk for treatment related complications.

E-27. Pregnant or lactating women. E-28. Participation in another clinical study with an investigational product during her chemotherapy course immediately prior to randomization.

E-29. Patient unable to swallow orally administered medication and patient with gastrointestinal disorders likely to interfere with absorption of the study medication.

E-30. Patient with a known hypersensitivity to olaparib or any of the recipients of the product.

E-31. Immunocompromised patient, e.g., with known active hepatitis (i.e. Hepatitis B or C) due to risk of transmitting the infection through blood or other body fluids or patient who is known to be serologically positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Efficacy by progression free survival (PFS1)

Time frame: phase up to a total of 15 months

Secondary Outcomes

Overall survival

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause.

Time frame: Study end

Time to earliest progression by RECIST or CA-125

Time to earliest progression by RECIST v. 1.1 or CA-125 or death is defined as the time from randomization to the earliest date of RECIST or CA-125 progression or death by any cause.

Time frame: Study end

Second Progression Free Survival (PFS2)

Time from randomization to second progression is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the progression event subsequent to that used for the primary variable PFS, or date of death.

Time frame: Study end

Time to start of first subsequent therapy or death (TFST)

Time to start of first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) will be assessed. TFST is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the date of anti-cancer therapy start date following study treatment discontinuation, or death.

Time frame: Study end

Time to start of second subsequent therapy or death (TSST)

Time to start of second subsequent therapy or death (TSST) will be assessed. TSST is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest of the date of second subsequent anti-cancer therapy start date following study treatment discontinuation, or death.

Time frame: Study end

Safety and Tolerability

Time frame: Study end

Patient reported outcome

Time frame: 2 years after last patient included

Locations

KH der Barmherzigen Brüder Graz, Graz, Austria

Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Landeskrankenhaus Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Krankenhaus Hietzing, Vienna, Austria

Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

UZ Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

Hôpital de la Citadelle, Liège, Belgium

Clinique et maternité Sainte Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium

CHU Dinant Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium

Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland

Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France

ICO Paul Papin, Angers, France

Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France

Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord, Bordeaux, France

Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France

Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble, Grenoble, France

Centre Hospitalier Départemental Les Oudairies, La Roche-sur-Yon, France

Hôpital Michallon - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France

Centre Jean Bernard - Clinique Victor Hugo, Le Mans, France

Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille - Hôpital Huriez, Lille, France

Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France

Hôpital de Mont-de-Marsan, Mont-de-Marsan, France

ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France

Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Mougins, France

Centre Catherine de Sienne - Group confluent, Nantes, France

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, Orléans, France

Institut Curie - Hopital Claudius Régaud, Paris, France

Hôpital des Diaconesses, Paris, France

Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France

Hopital Tenon, Paris, France

Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Joseph, Paris, France

Clinique Francheville, Périgueux, France

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France

Centre CARIO - HPCA, Plérin, France

Hôpital de la Milétrie - CHU de Poitiers - Pôle Régional de Cancérologie, Poitiers, France

Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France

Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France

Hôpital René Huguenin, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France

ICO Centre René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France

Centre de Radiothérapie - Clinique Sainte-Anne, Strasbourg, France

Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France

Clinique Pasteur - ONCOSUD, Toulouse, France

ICL Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany

Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

Hochtaunus-Kliniken, Bad Homburg, Germany

Praxisklinik Krebsheilkunde für Frauen, Berlin, Germany

HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (CVK), Berlin, Germany

Onkologie Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany

GYNAEKOLOGICUM Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Universitätsfrauenklinik Köln, Cologne, Germany

St. Elisabeth Krankenhaus, Cologne, Germany

Städtisches Klinikum Dessau, Dessau, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany

Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany

Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen am Neckar, Germany

Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germany

Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany

Universitätsfrauenklinik Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Universitäts-Frauenklinik Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

Klinkum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Halle, Halle, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Albertinen Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany

Gynäkologisch-Onkologische Praxis Hannover, Hanover, Germany

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany

St. Vincentius Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany

Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

Klinikum Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany

Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Johannes Wesling Klinikum, Minden, Germany

Klinikum der Universität München, München, Germany

Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany

Kliniken des Landkreises Neumarkt, Neumarkt, Germany

Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany

Ortenau Klinikum, Offenburg, Germany

Onkologie Ravensburg, Ravensburg, Germany

Universitätsfrauenklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

Klinikum am Steinenberg, Reutlingen, Germany

ROMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany

Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany

Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany

Universitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany

HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany

Marien Hospital Witten, Witten, Germany

amO Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany

Klinikum Worms, Worms, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

Centro Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy

Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy

Spedali Civili-Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Ospedale Senatore Antonio Perrino, Brindisi, Italy

EO Ospedali Galliera, Genova, Italy

Ospedale San Luca, Lucca, Italy

Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy

Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy

Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Pascale, Naples, Italy

Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padua, Italy

Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy

Ospedale Santa Chiara, Pisa, Italy

AO ASL 4 - Ospedale di Prato, Prato, Italy

Arcispedale S. M. Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Istituto Regina Elena, Roma, Italy

Policlinico Umberto I La Sapienza, Roma, Italy

Policlinico Universitario Gemelli Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy

Ospedale S. Anna, Torino, Italy

Ospedale Mauriziano, Torino, Italy

Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy

Ehime University Hospital, Ehime, Japan

Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyōgo, Japan

University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan

Kagoshima University Medical And Dental Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan

Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan

Jichi Medical University Hospital, Tochigi, Japan

National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Monaco, Monaco

H. U. Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, Spain

H. de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

C.S. Parc Taulí, Barcelona, Spain

H. U. Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain

H.U. Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain

MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain

H. U. Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

H. U. 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

H.U. Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain

Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain

H. General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

H. U. P. La Fe, Valencia, Spain

H. U. Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain

Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

Linked Papers

2024-12-18

Patterns of genomic instability in &gt; 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib

Abstract Background The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability. Patients and methods Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors. Results BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P &lt; 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS &lt; 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29–58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20–55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41–58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48–66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54–69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58–74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25–60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30–71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18–29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14–52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm. Conclusions These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents. Trial registration The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.

2024-04-01

Updated progression-free survival and final overall survival with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab according to clinical risk in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

In the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial (NCT02477644), adding maintenance olaparib to bevacizumab provided a substantial progression-free survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive tumors, irrespective of clinical risk. Subsequently, a clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival was reported with olaparib plus bevacizumab in the HRD-positive subgroup. We report updated progression-free survival and overall survival by clinical risk and HRD status. Patients in clinical response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab received maintenance olaparib (up to 24 months) plus bevacizumab (up to 15 months in total) or placebo plus bevacizumab. This Of 806 randomized patients, 74% were higher-risk and 26% were lower-risk. In higher-risk HRD-positive patients, the hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival was 0.46 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.34 to 0.61), with 5-year progression-free survival of 35% with olaparib plus bevacizumab versus 15% with bevacizumab alone; and the HR for overall survival was 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.00), with 5-year overall survival of 55% versus 42%, respectively. In lower-risk HRD-positive patients, the HR for progression-free survival was 0.26 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.45), with 5-year progression-free survival of 72% with olaparib plus bevacizumab versus 28% with bevacizumab alone; and the HR for overall survival was 0.31 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.66), with 5-year overall survival of 88% versus 61%, respectively. No benefit was seen in HRD-negative patients regardless of clinical risk. This

2022-09-05

Maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade ovarian cancer: Main analysis of second progression-free survival in the phase III PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) demonstrated a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab versus placebo plus bevacizumab in newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer. We report the prespecified main second progression-free survival (PFS2) analysis for PAOLA-1. This randomised, double-blind, phase III trial was conducted in 11 countries. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade ovarian cancer and were in response after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients were randomised 2:1 to olaparib (300 mg twice daily) or placebo for up to 24 months; all patients received bevacizumab (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for up to 15 months. Primary PFS end-point was reported previously. Time from randomisation to second disease progression or death was a key secondary end-point included in the hierarchical-testing procedure. After a median follow-up of 35.5 months and 36.5 months, respectively, median PFS2 was 36.5 months (olaparib plus bevacizumab) and 32.6 months (placebo plus bevacizumab), hazard ratio 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.95; P = 0.0125. Median time to second subsequent therapy or death was 38.2 months (olaparib plus bevacizumab) and 31.5 months (placebo plus bevacizumab), hazard ratio 0.78; 95% CI 0.64-0.95; P = 0.0115. Seventy-two (27%) patients in the placebo plus bevacizumab group received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor as first subsequent therapy. No new safety signals were observed for olaparib plus bevacizumab. In newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer, maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab provided continued benefit beyond first progression, with a significant PFS2 improvement and a time to second subsequent therapy or death delay versus placebo plus bevacizumab.

Safety and quality of life with maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab in older patients with ovarian cancer: subgroup analysis of PAOLA‑1/ENGOT-ov25

Abstract Background In PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25, the addition of olaparib to bevacizumab maintenance improved overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. We describe the safety profile and quality of life (QoL) of this combination in older patients in PAOLA-1. Methods Safety (CTCAE v4.03) and QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaires Core 30 and Ovarian 28) data were collected. We compared safety by age (≥70 vs &amp;lt;70 years) in the olaparib-containing arm. QoL by treatment arm was assessed in older patients. Geriatric features, including Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS), were also gathered. Results Of 806 patients randomized, 142 were ≥70 years old (olaparib-containing arm: n = 104; placebo arm: n = 38). Older patients treated with olaparib exhibited a similar safety profile to younger patients, except for higher rates of all grades of lymphopenia and grade ≥3 hypertension (31.7% vs 21.6%, P =.032 and 26.9% vs 16.7%, P =.019, respectively). No hematological malignancy was reported. Two years after randomization, mean Global Health Status and cognitive functioning seemed better with olaparib than bevacizumab alone (adjusted mean difference: +4.47 points [95% CI, −0.49 to 9.42] and +4.82 [−0.57 to 10.21], respectively), and other QoL items were similar between arms. In the olaparib-containing arm, older patients with baseline GVS ≥ 1 (n = 48) exhibited increased toxicity and poorer QoL than those with GVS of 0 (n = 34). Conclusion Among older patients in PAOLA-1, olaparib plus bevacizumab had a manageable safety profile and no adverse impact on QoL. Additional data are required to confirm these results in more vulnerable patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477644).

Platine, Avastin and OLAparib in 1st Line