Nedim Tokgozoglu

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IVB uterine serous carcinoma: a Turkish multicentric study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors for and determine the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on oncologic outcome in stage IVB pure serous endometrial carcinoma patients who received taxane and platinum. Forty-two patients with 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB uterine serous carcinoma were enrolled from six gynecologic oncology centers and a study group was created. The study group had a 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 32% and 2-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of 73%. On univariate analysis; lymphadenectomy (not performed vs. performed), paraaortic lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative) and number of metastatic lymph node count (≤5 vs. >5) were found to have statistical significance for DFS (

Assessment of the differences in oncologic outcomes between patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma and uterine serous carcinoma

AbstractAimTo evaluate whether the recurrence rates, recurrence patterns, and survival outcomes differed according to the primary site of the tumor in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) and uterine serous carcinoma (USC).MethodsThe population of this multicenter retrospective study consisted of patients who had USC or HGSOC. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) estimates were determined using the Kaplan–Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log‐rank test.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 247 patients with HGSOC and 34 with USC. Recurrence developed in 118 (51.1%) in the HGSOC group and 14 (42.4%) in the USC group (p = 0.352). The median time to recurrence was 23.5 (range, 4–144) and 17 (range, 4–43) months in the HGSOC and USC groups, respectively (p = 0.055). The 3‐year PFS was 52% in the HGSOC group and 47% in the USC group (p = 0.450). Additionally, 3‐year DSS was 92% and 82% in the HGSOC and USC groups, respectively (p = 0.060).ConclusionsHGSOC and USC are aggressive tumors with high recurrence and mortality rates in advanced stages. These two carcinomas, which are similar in molecular features and clinical management, may also have similar recurrence patterns, disease failure, and survival rates.

Comparison of oncologic outcome of preoveratively presumed low-risk endometrial cancer patients who underwent only bilateral pelvic sentinel lymph node (SLN) removal and those who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy in addition to bilateral pelvic SLN removal: Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group (TRSGO-SLN-009)

We aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with bilateral sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) detection and removed with those who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) in addition to bilateral SLNs removal. This multicenter, retrospective study included cases of endometrioid type, grade I-II endometrial cancer, in which bilateral SLNs were detected and removed. Patients who had only bilateral SLNs detected and removed (group I) and patients who had bilateral SLNs detected and removed and subsequent additional bilateral PLA (group II) were included in the evaluation. In group I (n=216), SLN metastasis rate was 5.5% and in group II (n=251), it was 10.3%. The low-volume disease detection rate was 4.6% in group I and 4.8% in group II. In group II, in patients with SLN macrometastasis had also 28.6% non-SLN macrometastasis. No false-negative results occurred in group II. Recurrence was detected 1.8% in group I and 5% in group II; however, there was no significant difference (p=0.083). Disease-free survival and overall survival, were almost same between the groups (hazard ratio [HR]=2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.681-6.588; p=0.187) and (HR=1.531; 95% CI=0.392-5.975; p=0.537), respectively. SLN mapping, ultrastaging, and immunohistochemical staining can identify low-volume metastases that may not be identified with classic lymphadenectomy and hematoxylin & eosin staining. It has been observed that adding PLA beyond SLN mapping did not provide an additional positive contribution to survival. For endometriod type grade I-II patients, detection of bilateral SLNs in both hemipelvis only, if detectable, is an adequate approach.

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer: results from an international, multi-institutional study

This study assessed oncologic outcomes of patients with intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer and isolated tumor cells (ITC) (≤0.2 mm or ≤200 cells) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Patients with SLN-ITC diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 were identified from 19 centers worldwide, while SLN-negative patients were identified at Mayo Clinic, Rochester between 2014 and 2018. Only patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (low-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion ≥50%; high-grade endometrioid histology and myometrial invasion <50%) were included. Oncologic outcomes were evaluated by grouping patients according to prognostic factors: SLN-ITC and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). SLN-ITC patients with post-operative observation or vaginal brachytherapy (VB) alone were compared with similar node-negative patients. Of the 166 patients included, those with simultaneous presence of SLN-ITC and LVSI were at higher risk of non-vaginal recurrence (HR 3.73 [95% CI 1.17 to 11.84], p = .01) compared with patients who were node-negative with no LVSI. Among the 122 patients (28 SLN-ITC, 94 node-negative) who underwent post-operative observation or VB alone, 1 isolated vaginal recurrence was documented in a node-negative patient, while non-vaginal recurrence occurred in 3 of 28 (10.7%) SLN-ITC and 7 of 94 (7.4%) node-negative patients. The median follow-up was 2.4 years (interquartile range; 1.8-3.0) among the remaining 25 ITC patients and 2.8 years (interquartile range; 0.8-4.2) among the remaining 87 node-negative patients. There was no difference in non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (SLN-ITC: 87.3% [95% CI 74.7% to 100.0%] vs node-negative: 82.2% [95% CI 69.1% to 97.9%], p = .46) or overall survival (SLN-ITC: 76.4% [95% CI 54.3 to 100.0] vs node-negative: 84.5% [95% CI 75.0 to 95.2], p = .28) between the 2 cohorts. In patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer and intermediate-risk factors (including patients who received chemotherapy/external beam radiotherapy), the combination of SLN-ITC and LVSI was associated with worse prognosis compared with patients with no risk factors or only 1 risk factor. In the sub-group of patients who received post-operative observation or VB alone, SLN-ITC did not worsen prognosis relative to node-negative patients.