Mollie E. Barnard

Molecular Subtypes of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer across Racial Groups and Gene Expression Platforms

Abstract Background: High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) gene expression subtypes are associated with differential survival. We characterized HGSC gene expression in Black individuals and considered whether gene expression differences by self-identified race may contribute to poorer HGSC survival among Black versus White individuals. Methods: We included newly generated RNA sequencing data from Black and White individuals and array-based genotyping data from four existing studies of White and Japanese individuals. We used K-means clustering, a method with no predefined number of clusters or dataset-specific features, to assign subtypes. Cluster- and dataset-specific gene expression patterns were summarized by moderated t-scores. We compared cluster-specific gene expression patterns across datasets by calculating the correlation between the summarized vectors of moderated t-scores. After mapping to The Cancer Genome Atlas–derived HGSC subtypes, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate subtype-specific survival by dataset. Results: Cluster-specific gene expression was similar across gene expression platforms and racial groups. Comparing the Black population with the White and Japanese populations, the immunoreactive subtype was more common (39% vs. 23%–28%) and the differentiated subtype was less common (7% vs. 22%–31%). Patterns of subtype-specific survival were similar between the Black and White populations with RNA sequencing data; compared with mesenchymal cases, the risk of death was similar for proliferative and differentiated cases and suggestively lower for immunoreactive cases [Black population HR = 0.79 (0.55, 1.13); White population HR = 0.86 (0.62, 1.19)]. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of HGSC subtypes varied by race, subtype-specific survival was similar. Impact: HGSC subtypes can be consistently assigned across platforms and self-identified racial groups.

Menopausal hormone therapy use and risk of ovarian cancer by race: the ovarian cancer in women of African ancestry consortium

Most studies examining post-menopausal menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use and ovarian cancer risk have focused on White women and few have included Black women. We evaluated MHT use and ovarian cancer risk in Black (n = 800 cases, 1783 controls) and White women (n = 2710 cases, 8556 controls), using data from the Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry consortium. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of MHT use with ovarian cancer risk, examining histotype, MHT type and duration of use. Long-term MHT use, ≥10 years, was associated with an increased ovarian cancer risk for White women (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.22-1.57) and the association was consistent for Black women (OR = 1.20, 95%CI: 0.81-1.78, p The association between long-term MHT use and ovarian cancer risk was consistent for Black and White women.

Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study

Background Uptake of risk-reducing surgery has increased among women at high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We sought to characterise familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes in a population-based study after accounting for gynaecological surgeries, including bilateral oophorectomy. Methods We compared risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in relatives of 3536 epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 1966–2016 and relatives of 35 326 matched controls. We used Cox competing risk models, incorporating bilateral oophorectomy as a competing risk, to estimate the relative risk of ovarian cancer in first-degree (FDR), second-degree (SDR) and third-degree (TDR) relatives from 1966 to 2016. We also estimated relative risks in time periods before (1966–1994, 1995–2004) and after (2005–2016) formal recommendations were made for prophylactic oophorectomy among women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2. Results The relative risks of epithelial ovarian cancer in FDRs, SDRs and TDRs of cases versus controls were 1.68 (95% CI 1.39 to 2.04), 1.51 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.75) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.48), respectively. Relative risks were greatest for high-grade serous, mucinous and ‘other epithelial’ histotypes. Relative risks were attenuated for case FDRs, but not for SDRs or TDRs, from 2005 onwards, consistent with the timing of recommendations for prophylactic surgery. Conclusion Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer extends to TDRs, especially for high-grade serous and mucinous histotypes. Distant relatives share genes but minimal environment, highlighting the importance of germline inherited genetics in ovarian cancer aetiology. Increased ovarian cancer risk in distant relatives has implications for counselling and recommendations for prophylactic surgeries that, from our data, appear only to reach FDRs.

Caregiver burden and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the Nurses’ Health Studies

Abstract Psychosocial stress may increase ovarian cancer risk and accelerate disease progression. We examined the association between caregiver burden, a common stressor, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We prospectively followed 67 724 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (1992-2012) and 70 720 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (2001-2009) who answered questions on informal caregiving (ie, caregiving outside of work). Women who reported no informal caregiving were considered noncaregivers, while, among women who provided care outside of work, caregiver burden was categorized by time spent caregiving and perceived stress from caregiving. For the 34% of women who provided informal care for ≥15 hours per week, 42% described caregiving as moderately to extremely stressful. Pooled multivariate analyses indicated no difference in ovarian cancer risk for women providing ≥15 hours of care per week compared to noncaregivers (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.18), and no association was evident for women who reported moderate or extreme stress from caregiving compared to noncaregivers (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.75-1.22). Together with prior work evaluating job strain and ovarian cancer risk, our findings suggest that, when evaluating a stressor’s role in cancer risk, it is critical to consider how the stressor contributes to the overall experience of distress. This article is part of a Special Collection on Gynecological Cancer.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Survival in Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma by Self-Reported Race

Abstract Background: Half of ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) have homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, HRD is not well characterized in Black individuals who experience worse survival after a diagnosis of HGSC. The objective of this study was to characterize ovarian HGSC HRD and examine its association with survival by self-reported race. Methods: HRD features were identified using matched tumor–normal whole-exome and RNA sequencing in an HGSC cohort. We calculated age- and stage-adjusted HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for survival, comparing individuals with a feature to those without, separately by self-reported race. Results: Any HRD was associated with a 32% reduced risk of death in Black individuals compared with a 62% reduction in White individuals (Black HR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43–1.09; White HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.14–1.04). More of the germline and somatic variants detected among Black individuals were unannotated or variants of uncertain significance (VUS; germline 65% vs. 45%; somatic 62% vs. 50%). Black individuals with germline unannotated/VUS were more likely to have tumors with HRD scarring and a first-degree family history of breast or ovarian cancer compared with those without (HRD scar 71.4% vs. 49.6%; family history 68.4% vs. 34.6%). Conclusions: HRD testing informs precision-based medicine approaches that improve outcomes, but a higher proportion of VUS among Black individuals may complicate referral for such care leading to worse outcomes for Black individuals. Impact: Our findings emphasize the importance of recruiting diverse individuals in genomics research and better characterizing VUS.