Eric Hahnen

Pathogenic germline variants in SMARCA4 and further cancer predisposition genes in early onset ovarian cancer

To assess the role of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in SMARCA4 and further established ovarian cancer (OC) predisposition genes in early onset OC, we investigated a clinical cohort of 206 unrelated OC index patients with an age at diagnosis of OC ≤40 years using an extended panel of 24 (candidate) cancer predisposition genes. PVs in established OC predisposition genes were most frequent in patients with high grade serous OC (21/62, 33.9%), comparatively rare in patients with epithelial OC other than high grade serous (5/74, 6.8%) or borderline ovarian tumours (2/39, 5.1%) and absent in mucinous OC (0/27). We demonstrate that germline PVs in SMARCA4 unlikely predispose for early onset OC other than SCCOHT.

Sensitivity and specificity of loss of heterozygosity analysis for the classification of rare germline variants in BRCA1/2: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883)

Variant-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses may be useful to classify BRCA1/2 germline variants of unknown significance (VUS). The sensitivity and specificity of this approach, however, remains unknown. We performed comparative next-generation sequencing analyses of the BRCA1/2 genes using blood-derived and tumour-derived DNA of 488 patients with ovarian cancer enrolled in the observational AGO-TR1 trial (NCT02222883). Overall, 94 pathogenic, 90 benign and 24 VUS were identified in the germline. A significantly increased variant fraction (VF) of a germline variant in the tumour indicates loss of the wild-type allele; a decreased VF indicates loss of the variant allele. We demonstrate that significantly increased VFs predict pathogenicity with high sensitivity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91), poor specificity (0.63, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73) and poor positive predictive value (PPV; 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79). Significantly decreased VFs predict benignity with low sensitivity (0.26, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.35), high specificity (1.0, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) and PPV (1.0, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). Variant classification based on significantly increased VFs results in an unacceptable proportion of false-positive results. A significantly decreased VF in the tumour may be exploited as a reliable predictor for benignity, with no false-negative result observed. When applying the latter approach, VUS identified in four patients can now be considered benign. Trial registration number NCT02222883.

Effect of HIPEC according to HRD/BRCAwt genomic profile in stage III ovarian cancer: Results from the phase III OVHIPEC trial

AbstractThe addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence‐free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage III ovarian cancer. Homologous recombination deficient (HRD) ovarian tumors are usually more platinum sensitive. Since hyperthermia impairs BRCA1/2 protein function, we hypothesized that HRD tumors respond best to treatment with HIPEC. We analyzed the effect of HIPEC in patients in the OVHIPEC trial, stratified by HRD status and BRCAm status. Clinical data and tissue samples were collected from patients included in the randomized, phase III OVHIPEC‐1 trial. DNA copy number variation (CNV) profiles, HRD‐related pathogenic mutations and BRCA1 promotor hypermethylation were determined. CNV‐profiles were categorized as HRD or non‐HRD, based on a previously validated algorithm‐based BRCA1‐like classifier. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 99% confidence intervals (CI) for the effect of RFS and OS of HIPEC in the BRCAm, the HRD/BRCAwt and the non‐HRD group were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. Tumor DNA was available from 200/245 (82%) patients. Seventeen (9%) tumors carried a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 and 14 (7%) in BRCA2. Ninety‐one (46%) tumors classified as BRCA1‐like. The effect of HIPEC on RFS and OS was absent in BRCAm tumors (HR 1.25; 99%CI 0.48‐3.29), and most present in HRD/BRCAwt (HR 0.44; 99%CI 0.21‐0.91), and non‐HRD/BRCAwt tumors (HR 0.82; 99%CI 0.48‐1.42), interaction P value: 0.024. Patients with HRD tumors without pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation appear to benefit most from treatment with HIPEC, while benefit in patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations and patients without HRD seems less evident.

Prevalence of BRCA in Patients With Ovarian Cancer

The aim of this prospective registration and translational research study is to evaluate the praevalence of BRCA regarding germline and somatic mutations.