Prevalence of BRCA in Patients With Ovarian Cancer

NCT02222883CompletedOBSERVATIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

AGO Research GmbH

Enrollment

530

Start Date

2015-03-01

Completion Date

2021-04-01

Study Type

OBSERVATIONAL

Official Title

Prevalence of BRCA in Patients With Primary or Platinum Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Interventions

Testing of BRCA status regarding germline and somatic mutation

Conditions

BRCA StatusOvarian Cancer

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

* Female ovarian cancer patients aged \>= 18 years.
* Women with first diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer OR women diagnosed with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.
* Multiple platinum based prior therapies are allowed.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Non-epithelial ovarian malignancy.
* Platinum-resistant or refractory disease.
* Paraffin embedded tumor samples not available.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Germline alterations in BRCA1/2 (yes/no) and other ovarian cancer predisposing genes (yes/no; if yes which)

Time frame: once per sample

Secondary Outcomes

Results of Immunohistochemistry in tumor samples

Time frame: once per sample

Somatic alterations in BRCA1/2 (yes/no) and other ovarian cancer predisposing genes (yes/no; if yes which)

Time frame: once per sample

BRCAness tumor phenotype in ovarian cancer (yes/no).

Time frame: once per sample

Differences of tumor samples from primary and relapsed disease

Time frame: once per sample for each stage of disease

Patient Survey for perspectives and satisfaction regarding testing and counseling

3 questions

Time frame: once after BRCA result is available

Determining the correlation of genetic alterations, cancer treatments, overall survival, progression-free survival and occurrence of new malignancies

Time frame: once

Locations

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Universitätsklinik Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany

Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany

Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hanover, Germany

NCT Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

Zentrum für Gynäkologische Onkologie, Kiel, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany

LMU München, Klinik Großhadern, München, Germany

Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany

Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Tübingen, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany

Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

Linked Papers

2021-09-30

Ovarian Cancer–Specific BRCA -like Copy-Number Aberration Classifiers Detect Mutations Associated with Homologous Recombination Deficiency in the AGO-TR1 Trial

Abstract Purpose: Previously, we developed breast cancer BRCA1-like and BRCA2-like copy-number profile shrunken centroid classifiers predictive for mutation status and response to therapy, targeting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Therefore, we investigated BRCA1- and BRCA2-like classification in ovarian cancer, aiming to acquire classifiers with similar properties as those in breast cancer. Experimental Design: We analyzed DNA copy-number profiles of germline BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutant ovarian cancers and control tumors and observed that existing breast cancer classifiers did not sufficiently predict mutation status. Hence, we trained new shrunken centroid classifiers on this set and validated them in the independent The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Subsequently, we assessed BRCA1/2-like classification and obtained germline and tumor mutation and methylation status of cancer predisposition genes, among them several involved in HR repair, of 300 ovarian cancer samples derived from the consecutive cohort trial AGO-TR1 (NCT02222883). Results: The detection rate of the BRCA1-like classifier for BRCA1 mutations and promoter hypermethylation was 95.6%. The BRCA2-like classifier performed less accurately, likely due to a smaller training set. Furthermore, three quarters of the BRCA1/2-like tumors could be explained by (epi)genetic alterations in BRCA1/2, germline RAD51C mutations and alterations in other genes involved in HR. Around half of the non–BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer cases displayed a BRCA-like phenotype. Conclusions: The newly trained classifiers detected most BRCA-mutated and methylated cancers and all tumors harboring a RAD51C germline mutations. Beyond that, we found an additional substantial proportion of ovarian cancers to be BRCA-like.

2020-12-03

Sensitivity and specificity of loss of heterozygosity analysis for the classification of rare germline variants in BRCA1/2: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883)

Variant-specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses may be useful to classify BRCA1/2 germline variants of unknown significance (VUS). The sensitivity and specificity of this approach, however, remains unknown. We performed comparative next-generation sequencing analyses of the BRCA1/2 genes using blood-derived and tumour-derived DNA of 488 patients with ovarian cancer enrolled in the observational AGO-TR1 trial (NCT02222883). Overall, 94 pathogenic, 90 benign and 24 VUS were identified in the germline. A significantly increased variant fraction (VF) of a germline variant in the tumour indicates loss of the wild-type allele; a decreased VF indicates loss of the variant allele. We demonstrate that significantly increased VFs predict pathogenicity with high sensitivity (0.84, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.91), poor specificity (0.63, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.73) and poor positive predictive value (PPV; 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.79). Significantly decreased VFs predict benignity with low sensitivity (0.26, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.35), high specificity (1.0, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) and PPV (1.0, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). Variant classification based on significantly increased VFs results in an unacceptable proportion of false-positive results. A significantly decreased VF in the tumour may be exploited as a reliable predictor for benignity, with no false-negative result observed. When applying the latter approach, VUS identified in four patients can now be considered benign. Trial registration number NCT02222883.

Prevalence of BRCA in Patients With Ovarian Cancer