Investigator

Şener Gezer

Kocaeli Niversitesi

ŞGŞener Gezer
Papers(4)
The impact of mismatc…Application of thromb…Cervical versus endom…Extremely high a<scp>…
Collaborators(8)
Esra Betül Tunceİzzet YücesoyMüzeyyen Dilşad EserOzge Senem Yucel CicekOzgur CakirRumeysa Hekimoglu Gur…Alparslan PulurBüşra Yaprak Bayrak
Institutions(2)
Kocaeli NiversitesiBezmilem Vakf Niversi…

Papers

The impact of mismatch repair (MMR), p53, and LCAM-1 immunohistochemical expression on prognosis in low-risk endometrial cancer

To investigate the relationship between mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, TP53, and L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) immunohistochemical staining and their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in low-risk endometrial cancer. A total of 253 low-risk endometrial cancer patients were retrospectively screened. Immunohistochemical stains were applied to tumor tissue samples to assess MMR deficiency, TP53, and L1CAM expression, and survival analysis were performed. The expected PFS time was 78.6 months for the MMR-proficient group and 70.3 months for the MMR-deficient group (p = 0.011). OS was 71.6 months for the MMR-proficient group and 68.2 months for the MMR-deficient group (p = 0.755). L1CAM overexpression was associated with a poorer PFS, 62.7 months compared to 77.7 months (p = 0.039). However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS, 58.5 months versus 72.1 months, respectively (p = 0.242). p53 abnormal (p53-abn) staining was associated with a worse prognosis in terms of PFS, 62.8 months versus 77.7 months (p = 0.035), and OS, 43.4 months versus 73 months, respectively (p < 0.001), compared to patients with wild-type staining. No significant statistical relationship was observed in survival times concerning tumor diameter, grade, and lymphadenectomy status. In a multivariate analysis, MMR deficiency emerged as an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS, while p53-abn was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for OS. p53-abn staining was associated with a poor prognosis for both PFS and OS in low-risk endometrial cancer patients. Meanwhile, MMR deficiency and L1CAM positivity were found to be associated solely with a poorer prognosis for PFS.

Application of thrombin gel matrix for the prevention of lymphocele in patients with endometrial cancer: A prospective randomized trial

To evaluate a thrombin gel matrix (TGM), Floseal, for the prevention of lymphocele in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy. A total of 79 consecutive patients with endometrial cancer were randomly allocated to one of two groups: the TGM group and control group. After completion of the lymphadenectomy, 5 mL of Floseal was applied to the bilateral pelvic sidewalls, especially the femoral canal, obturator, and common iliac vessels areas. Computed tomography scans were obtained for lymphocele evaluation 2 months after the surgery. Three patients from the TGM group, and four patients from the control group were lost during follow-up, and data from 36 participants from each group were analyzed. As the primary outcome, lymphocele developed in 12 patients in both groups (33 %). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of lymphocele and symptomatic lymphocele development. Lymphocele localization was also not different between the two groups, but the diameter of the lymphoceles detected in the TGM group was significantly greater (p = 0.021). The mean drainage days was significantly shorter in the TGM group (p = 0.015). The amount of drainage was also less in the TGM group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Thrombin gel matrix applied to the pelvic sidewalls does not reduce the incidence of symptomatic or asymptomatic lymphoceles after pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. However, it can reduce the amount of drainage and the number of drainage days so it can help to shorten hospitalization.

4Papers
8Collaborators