David S Miller

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced endometrial cancer: 5-year outcomes from the randomized, phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775

Background In Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 ( NCT03517449 ), lenvatinib+pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in advanced endometrial cancer (EC). We report 5-year follow-up results. Methods Participants had advanced/recurrent/metastatic EC with progressive disease after one prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), and no prior receipt of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 agents. Participants were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Pembrolizumab was given for ≤35 cycles. Primary endpoints were OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR and safety. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Miettinen and Nurminen methodology. Results 827 participants were randomized. At data cut-off (February 26, 2025), overall median follow-up was 68.8 months; 139 participants were alive (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=86; chemotherapy, n=53), and all had ended their treatment in this study. Five-year OS rate was 16.7% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab versus 7.3% with chemotherapy in mismatch repair-proficient EC, 36.5% versus 9.8% in mismatch repair-deficient EC, and 19.9% versus 7.7% in all-comers. Five-year PFS rates were 6.3% versus 2.1%, 26.4% versus 10.8%, and 9.8% versus 3.2%, respectively. In all-comers, treatment-related adverse events led to any treatment discontinuation in 32.3% versus 5.9%. Subsequent systemic anticancer therapy was used by 44.8% versus 51.2% (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab by 2.4% vs 10.1%). Conclusions Results were consistent with the primary analysis despite increased use of subsequent systemic anticancer therapy and crossover to lenvatinib+pembrolizumab in the chemotherapy group. The continued durable benefit, including OS, with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and no new safety signals lend further support for this regimen as a standard of care therapy for EC.

Phase II Trial of Ribociclib Plus Letrozole in Women With Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneum: A GOG Partners Trial (GOG 3026)

PURPOSE Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSOC) of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum is a hormonally driven, relatively chemoresistant malignancy with limited treatment options in the recurrent setting. Given frequent estrogen receptor (ER) expression and dysregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6)–p16–Rb pathway, features shared with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer, dual endocrine, and CDK4/6 inhibition is a biologically rational strategy. This phase II trial evaluated ribociclib plus letrozole in recurrent LGSOC. METHODS This open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II study enrolled women with measurable, recurrent LGSOC. Patients received ribociclib (600 mg orally, once daily, days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) and letrozole (2.5 mg orally, once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Of 74 patients screened, 51 were enrolled and 49 treated. The confirmed ORR was 30.6% (90% CI, 19.9 to 43.2), including one complete and 14 partial responses. Among responders, the median duration of response was 21.2 months. The CBR was 84% (90% CI, 72.5 to 91.6). The median PFS was 14.5 months (90% CI, 10.1 to 28.8), and the median OS was 44.5 months (90% CI, 31.8 to not reached). The most common grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (47%), managed with dose modifications. Three grade 5 events (6%) occurred but were unrelated to treatment. Treatment discontinuation because of AEs occurred in 4%. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION Ribociclib plus letrozole met the primary end point, achieving meaningful response rates and durable disease control in recurrent LGSOC. The safety profile was consistent with prior CDK4/6 inhibitor studies. This combination represents a therapeutic option in this rare and genomically distinct subtype.

Sex Hormones, Insulin, and Insulin-like Growth Factors in Recurrence of High-Stage Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Background: The influence of sex hormone and insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis signaling on endometrial cancer recurrence is unknown. We evaluated these pathways in a prospective cohort of Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)0210 trial endometrial adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: Stage II–IV patients (N = 816) were included in this study. Pretreatment specimens were tested for tumor mRNA and protein expression of IGF1, IGF2, IGF-binding proteins (IGFBP)-1 and -3, insulin (IR) and IGF-I receptors (IGF1R), phosphorylated IR/IGF1R (pIGF1R/pIR), and estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) using qPCR and IHC. Serum concentrations of insulin, IGF-I, IGFBP-3, estradiol, estrone, and sex hormone binding globulin were measured. HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for progression-free survival were calculated from Cox models adjusting for age, stage, and grade. Results: Recurrence occurred in 280 (34%) cases during a median of 4.6 years of follow-up. ER positivity (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.47–0.95), IR positivity (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.98), and circulating IGF-I (highest vs. lowest quartile: HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47–0.92) were inversely associated with recurrence risk. Circulating estradiol (highest vs. lowest tertile: HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.02–2.36) and pIGF1R/pIR positivity (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02–1.92) were associated with increased recurrence risk. Conclusions: Circulating estradiol and tumor tissue phosphorylated (activated) IGR1R/IR were independently associated with higher risk of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer. Impact: This study may inform future clinical trials of endocrine-targeted adjuvant therapies in patients with endometrial cancer that could include baseline assessment of serum and tissue biomarkers of estradiol and insulin signaling pathways.

Long-Term Follow-Up and Overall Survival in NRG258, a Randomized Phase III Trial of Chemoradiation Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma

This randomized phase III trial aimed to determine whether treatment with cisplatin and volume-directed radiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel for four cycles (chemoradiotherapy [C-RT]) increased recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel for six cycles (chemotherapy [CT]) in locally advanced endometrial cancer (UC). Previously reported results showed that C-RT did not improve RFS compared with CT. Here we report the final OS analysis. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage III-IVA UC or stage I/II serous or clear cell UC and positive cytology were enrolled. The primary objective was RFS. Secondary objectives were OS, toxicity, and quality of life. Cumulative probabilities of OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses of treatment effect for FIGO stage, age, race, gross residual disease, histology, lymph-vascular space invasion, and body mass index were performed. In total, 813 patients were randomly assigned (407 C-RT and 406 CT). The median follow-up was 112 months. Median OS was not achieved in either arm. The stratified hazard ratio for death comparing C-RT versus CT was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.34, log-rank two-sided P value = .72). None of the factors analyzed predicted OS benefit from C-RT. Although C-RT reduced the rate of local recurrence compared with CT, it did not increase OS or RFS in stage III/IVA UC.

Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination therapy for advanced endometrial carcinoma

Advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma remains a difficult diagnosis to treat due to the limited and ineffective available treatment options following platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Patients who are microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) have even poorer outcomes with fewer effective therapies. Fortunately, recent Phase Ib/II and Phase III trials have demonstrated that combination pembrolizumab and lenvatinib resulted in improved ORR, PFS, and OS than currently used therapies in this setting. In this article, we review the history and notable clinical trials responsible for the advancement and status of treatment options available for advanced endometrial cancer. Most importantly, we review the recently published data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. The combination pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is an effective treatment regimen for patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer who are MSS or pMMR who have failed prior platinum-based treatment. This combination should be routinely offered to patients following progression or recurrence of systemic platinum and taxane chemotherapy. Although this regimen is safe and effective, clinicians should be aware of the known toxicities and assess patients regularly to determine if dose modifications or interruptions are indicated.

Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer

Standard therapy for advanced endometrial cancer after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy remains unclear. In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with advanced endometrial cancer who had previously received at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen to receive either lenvatinib (20 mg, administered orally once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg, administered intravenously every 3 weeks) or chemotherapy of the treating physician's choice (doxorubicin at 60 mg per square meter of body-surface area, administered intravenously every 3 weeks, or paclitaxel at 80 mg per square meter, administered intravenously weekly [with a cycle of 3 weeks on and 1 week off]). The two primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed on blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival. The end points were evaluated in patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease and in all patients. Safety was also assessed. A total of 827 patients (697 with pMMR disease and 130 with mismatch repair-deficient disease) were randomly assigned to receive lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (411 patients) or chemotherapy (416 patients). The median progression-free survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy (pMMR population: 6.6 vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.72; P<0.001; overall: 7.2 vs. 3.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.66; P<0.001). The median overall survival was longer with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab than with chemotherapy (pMMR population: 17.4 vs. 12.0 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; P<0.001; overall: 18.3 vs. 11.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.75; P<0.001). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 88.9% of the patients who received lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and in 72.7% of those who received chemotherapy. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with advanced endometrial cancer. (Funded by Eisai and Merck Sharp and Dohme [a subsidiary of Merck]; Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03517449.).

Progress in endometrial cancer: Contributions of the former Gynecologic Oncology Group

For over forty years, the Gynecologic Oncology Group drove progress in treating endometrial cancer. The first decades of investigation began with a meticulous prospective, surgicopathologic staging study that was the platform for development of all subsequent trials. The resultant statistical model of low risk, intermediate risk, and high-risk groups of patients led to trials where therapeutic modalities were best targeted at disease spread. A clear role for chemotherapy was established. It was realized that greater advances might be achieved with the advent of newer anti-neoplastic agents and these agents were subjected to extensive phase II testing. These agents later were integrated into comparison trials for advanced endometrial cancer. Multimodality therapy continues to show promise. Hormonal therapy was thoroughly investigated and led to combination hormonal therapy trials. Newer agents, including biologics are under active study, as well as the potential contribution of modern imaging techniques. Finally, GOG0210 established a repository of clinical specimens with detailed clinical and epidemiologic data from patients with surgically staged endometrial carcinoma. This should provide for a much greater understanding of molecular characteristics associated with risk of endometrial cancer recurrence, clinical and histological characteristics, and epidemiologic factors.

Comparing Durvalumab, Olaparib, and Cediranib Monotherapy, Combination Therapy, or Chemotherapy in Patients with Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer with Prior Bevacizumab: The Phase II NRG-GY023 Trial

Abstract Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of anti–PD-L1 durvalumab in combination with olaparib and cediranib (DOC), compared with the standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), who had prior bevacizumab. Patients and Methods: NRG-GY023 was the first randomized four-arm superiority phase II trial enrolling patients with high-grade serous/endometrioid or clear-cell PROC with prior bevacizumab exposure. Patients were randomized 1:2:2:2 to SOC (weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), DOC, durvalumab + cediranib (DC), or olaparib + cediranib (OC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival, overall response rate, and safety. The design had 80% power to detect an HR of 0.5 using a one-sided, α = 0.1-level test for each comparison with the SOC with a preplanned interim analysis. Experimental arms with HR estimates (vs. SOC) &amp;gt;0.87 could be discontinued. Results: A total of 153 patients were enrolled between April 4, 2021, and February 1, 2023. Accrual was permanently closed on February 1, 2023, due to futility. With a data cutoff of September 9, 2024, the median PFS was 3.4, 2.9, 2.5, and 2.8 months, and median overall survival was 7.5, 8.3, 5.7, and 10.2 months for SOC, DOC, DC, and OC, respectively. The overall response rate was 4.3% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.00–0.19], 15.9% (95% CI, 0.07–0.29), 11.9% (95% CI, 0.05–0.24), and 9.1% (95% CI, 0.03–0.20) for SOC, DOC, DC, and OC, respectively. Compared with SOC, the PFS HR estimates were 1.003 (95% CI, 0.56–1.80), 1.108 (95% CI, 0.63–1.96), and 1.021 (95% CI, 0.57–1.82) for DOC, DC, and OC, respectively. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: In patients with PROC with prior bevacizumab, all experimental arms failed to reach the primary objective of improving PFS compared with SOC.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial

PURPOSE This phase III randomized trial ( NCT00954174 ) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test. RESULTS The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P &lt; .01 for noninferiority, P &gt; .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = &lt; 0.01 for noninferiority, P &lt; .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.

Stage IVA cervical cancer: outcomes of disease related complications and treatment

Stage IVA cervical cancer is an uncommon diagnosis. The course of the disease and the complications of treatment are not well characterized. The goal of this study was to report treatment outcomes of patients with stage IVA cervical cancer. A single institution retrospective review was carried out of all patients treated for stage IVA cervical cancer from January 2008 to July 2017. Patients were clinically staged using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging criteria for cervical cancer. Inclusion criteria were patients with stage IVA cervical cancer of any histologic subtype, including patients with evidence of para-aortic lymph node involvement, treated at the institution during this time period. Overall survival and progression free survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meyer method. Comparisons between survival were done using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the log rank test. We identified 25 patients with stage IVA cervical cancer. Mean age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 27-77). Squamous cell carcinoma was the histologic diagnosis in 24 of 25 patients (96%), with 1 case of small cell carcinoma (4%). 21 patients completed a full course of radiation. The median overall survival for patients who completed their treatment was 60 months (range 3-136), with a 2 year overall survival of 63%. The median progression free survival was 27 months (range 0-125), with a 2 year progression free survival of 40%. 11 of 25 patients (44%) developed fistulas during the course of their disease, and 55% of these were complex fistulas. 19 of 25 (76%) patients had a percutaneous nephrostomy for either hydronephrosis or diversion of vesicovaginal fistula. 111 unplanned admissions occurred among the 25 patients, and infections of the urinary tract was implicated in 46 (41%) of these. The cohort had a total of 92 emergency department visits, with pain control (36%) and medication refills (15%) being the most common presentations. Patients with stage IVA cervical cancer may have substantial long term survival, although the sequelae of disease and treatment is associated with significant morbidity. Symptoms of fistula, percutaneous nephrostomy complications, and chronic pain present unique issues that require extensive supportive care.

Radiation Therapy With or Without Cisplatin for Local Recurrences of Endometrial Cancer: Results From an NRG Oncology/GOG Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

PURPOSE Pelvic recurrence is a frequent pattern of relapse for women with endometrial cancer. A randomized trial compared progression-free survival (PFS) after treatment with radiation therapy alone as compared with concurrent chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2008 and August 2020, 165 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either radiation treatment alone or a combination of chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether chemoradiation therapy was more effective than radiation therapy alone at improving PFS. RESULTS The majority of patients had low-grade (1 or 2) endometrioid histology (82%) and recurrences confined to the vagina (86%). External beam with either the three-dimensional or intensity modulated radiation treatment technique was followed by a boost delivered with brachytherapy or external beam. Patients randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy were treated with once weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2). Rates of acute toxicity were higher in patients treated with chemoradiation as compared with radiation treatment alone. Median PFS was longer for patients treated with radiation therapy alone as compared with chemotherapy and radiation (median PFS was not reached for RT v 73 months for chemoradiation, hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.75 to 2.07). At 3 years, 73% of patients treated definitively with radiation and 62% of patients treated with chemoradiation were alive and free of disease progression. CONCLUSION Excellent outcomes can be achieved for women with localized recurrences of endometrial cancer when treated with radiation therapy. The addition of chemotherapy does not improve PFS for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for recurrent endometrial cancer and increases acute toxicity. Patients with low-grade and vaginal recurrences who constituted the majority of those enrolled are best treated with radiation therapy alone.

Phase II Trial of Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: NRG Oncology/GOG Study 279

PURPOSE To assess efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin (C) and gemcitabine (G) with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer not amenable to surgery. METHODS Patients enrolled in a single-arm phase II study. Pretreatment inguinal-femoral nodal assessment was performed. Sixty-four Gy IMRT was prescribed to the vulva, with 50-64 Gy delivered to the groins/low pelvis. Radiation therapy (RT) plans were quality-reviewed pretreatment. C 40 mg/m2 and G 50 mg/m2 were administered once per week throughout IMRT. Complete pathologic response (CPR) was the primary end point. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients enrolled, of which 52 were evaluable. The median age was 58 years (range, 25-58), and 94% were White. Forty (77%) had stage II or III disease, and all had squamous histology. A median of six chemotherapy cycles (range, 1-8) were received. Eighty-five percent of RT plans were quality-reviewed with 100% compliance to protocol. Seven patients came off trial because of toxicity or patient withdrawal. Of 52 patients available for pathologic assessment, 38 (73% [90% CI, 61 to 83]) achieved CPR. No pelvic exenterations were performed. With a median follow-up of 51 months, the 12-month PFS was 74% (90% CI, 62.2 to 82.7) and the 24-month OS was 70% (90% CI, 57 to 79). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hematologic toxicity and radiation dermatitis. There was one grade 5 event unlikely related to treatment. CONCLUSION Weekly C and G concurrent with IMRT sufficiently improved CPR in women with locally advanced vulvar squamous cell carcinoma not amenable to surgical resection.

Pembrolizumab, Lenvatinib and IL-15 Superagonist N-803 in Combination With HER2 Targeting Autologous Dendritic Cell (AdHER2DC) Vaccine in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) of the uterus is becoming more common in the US. Sometimes EC often has increased levels of a protein called HER2. Cancers with HER2 tend to be more aggressive and have poorer outcomes. Objective: To test 2 study drugs-a vaccine that targets HER2 (AdHER2DC) plus a drug that supercharges immune cells that kill tumor cells (N-803)-combined with 2 FDA-approved cancer treatment drugs in people with EC. Eligibility: Adults aged 18 and older with HER2-positive EC that returned or got worse after treatment. Design: AdHER2DC vaccine is made from each participant s own blood. Participants will undergo apheresis: Blood is removed from the body through a tube attached to a needle. The blood passes through a machine that separates out the target cells. The remaining blood is returned to the body through a second needle. A special catheter may be needed. The first treatment cycle is 28 days; each cycle after that will be 21 days. All participants will get the 2 approved drugs and the vaccine. One drug is a tablet taken by mouth once a day, every day. The other drug is given through a tube attached to a needle inserted into a vein. The vaccine is injected under the skin. Participants will receive the vaccine on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Additional doses up to 3 doses will be give if possible. Some participants will receive N-803. This drug is injected under the skin of the abdomen on day 1 of each cycle. Treatment may last up to 1 year. Follow-up visits will continue up to 2 more years.

Lenvatinib in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With Advanced Endometrial Cancer (MK-3475-775/E7080-G000-309 Per Merck Standard Convention [KEYNOTE-775])

This is a study of pembrolizumab (MK-3475, KEYTRUDA®) in combination with lenvatinib (E7080) versus treatment of physician's choice (doxorubicin or paclitaxel) for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pembrolizumab and lenvatinib or treatment of physician's choice. The primary study hypothesis is that pembrolizumab in combination with lenvatinib prolongs progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared to treatment of physician's choice.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin or Ifosfamide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Persistent or Recurrent Uterine, Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cavity Cancer

This randomized phase III trial studies paclitaxel and carboplatin see how well they work compared with paclitaxel and ifosfamide in treating patients with fallopian tube, or peritoneal cavity cancer that is newly diagnosed, persistent, or has come back (recurrent). Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as paclitaxel, carboplatin, and ifosfamide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether paclitaxel is more effective when given with carboplatin or ifosfamide in treating patients with uterine, ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cavity cancer.