Lenvatinib in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With Advanced Endometrial Cancer (MK-3475-775/E7080-G000-309 Per Merck Standard Convention [KEYNOTE-775])

NCT03517449CompletedPHASE3INTERVENTIONAL

Summary

Key Facts

Lead Sponsor

Eisai Inc.

Enrollment

827

Start Date

2018-06-11

Completion Date

2022-03-01

Study Type

INTERVENTIONAL

Official Title

A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With Advanced Endometrial Cancer

Interventions

PembrolizumabLenvatinibPaclitaxelDoxorubicin

Conditions

Endometrial Neoplasms

Eligibility

Age Range

18 Years+

Sex

FEMALE

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Has a histologically confirmed diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma (EC)
2. Documented evidence of advanced, recurrent or metastatic EC.
3. Has radiographic evidence of disease progression after 1 prior systemic, platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for EC. Participants may have received up to 1 additional line of platinum-based chemotherapy if given in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment setting.

   Note: There is no restriction regarding prior hormonal therapy.
4. Has historical or fresh tumor biopsy specimen for determination of mismatch repair (MMR) status.
5. Has at least 1 measurable target lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and confirmed by Blinded Independent Central Review BICR.
6. Has Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 within 7 days of starting study treatment.
7. Is not pregnant, breastfeeding, and agrees to use a highly effective method of contraception during the treatment period and for at least 120 days (for participants treated with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab) or at least 180 days (for participants treated with treatment of physician's choice \[TPC\]) after the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Has carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mullerian tumor), endometrial leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcomas.
2. Has unstable central nervous system (CNS) metastases.
3. Has active malignancy (except for endometrial cancer, definitively treated in-situ carcinomas \[e.g. breast, cervix, bladder\], or basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) within 24 months of study start.
4. Has gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib.
5. Has a pre-existing greater than or equal (\>=) Grade 3 gastrointestinal or non-gastrointestinal fistula.
6. Has radiographic evidence of major blood vessel invasion/infiltration.
7. Has clinically significant hemoptysis or tumor bleeding within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment.
8. Has a history of congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) stroke, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability within 12 months of the first dose of study treatment.
9. Has an active infection requiring systemic treatment.
10. Has not recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from major surgery prior to starting therapy.
11. Is positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
12. Has active Hepatitis B or C.
13. Has a history of (non-infectious) pneumonitis that required treatment with steroids, or has current pneumonitis.
14. Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the study.
15. Has a diagnosis of immunodeficiency or is receiving chronic systemic steroid therapy (in dosing exceeding 10 mg daily of prednisone equivalent) or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to study start -Has an active autoimmune disease (with the exception of psoriasis) that has required systemic treatment in the past 2 years.
16. Is pregnant or breastfeeding.
17. Has had an allogenic tissue/solid organ transplant.
18. Has received \>1 prior systemic chemotherapy regimen (other than adjuvant or neoadjuvant) for Endometrial Cancer. Participants may receive up to 2 regimens of platinum-based chemotherapy in total, as long as one is given in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment setting.
19. Has received prior anticancer treatment within 28 days of study start. All acute toxicities related to prior treatments must be resolved to Grade ≤1, except for alopecia and Grade ≤2 peripheral neuropathy.
20. Has received prior treatment with any treatment targeting VEGF-directed angiogenesis, any anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2 agent.
21. Has received prior treatment with an agent directed to a stimulatory or co-inhibitory T-cell receptor other than an anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, or anti-PD-L2 agent, and who has discontinued from that treatment due to a Grade 3 or higher immune-related adverse event.
22. Has received prior radiation therapy within 21 days of study start with the exception of palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions, which is allowed if completed 2 weeks of study start. Participants must have recovered from all radiation-related toxicities and/or complications prior to randomization.
23. Has received a live vaccine within 30 days of study start.
24. Has a known intolerance to study treatment (or any of the excipients).
25. Prior enrollment on a clinical study evaluating pembrolizumab and lenvatinib for endometrial carcinoma, regardless of treatment received.
26. Is currently participating in or has participated in a study of an investigational agent or has used an investigational device within 4 weeks of study start.
27. Participants with urine protein ≥1 gram (g)/24 hour.
28. Prolongation of corrected QT (QTc) interval to \>480 milliseconds (ms).
29. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the institutional normal range as determined by multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram (ECHO).

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) in Mismatch Repair Proficient (pMMR) Participants

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of disease progression, as determined by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death due to any cause (whichever occurred first). Disease progression was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter \[mm\]) in the sum of diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Up to approximately 27 months

PFS Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on BICR in All-comer Participants

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of disease progression, as determined by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death due to any cause (whichever occurred first). Disease progression was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter \[mm\]) in the sum of diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was estimated and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: Up to approximately 27 months

Overall Survival (OS) in pMMR Participants

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up and those who were alive at the date of data cut-off were censored at the date the participant was last known alive, or date of data cut-off, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Up to approximately 43 months

OS in All-comer Participants

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up and those who were alive at the date of data cut-off were censored at the date the participant was last known alive, or date of data cut-off, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: Up to approximately 43 months

Secondary Outcomes

Objective Response Rate (ORR) in pMMR Participants

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by BICR per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (\<) 10mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months

ORR in All-comer Participants

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by BICR per RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (\<) 10mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

Time frame: Up to approximately 80 months

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) in pMMR Participants

EORTC QLQ-C30 was a questionnaire which included 30 questions that rates the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) in All-comer Participants

EORTC QLQ-C30 was a questionnaire which included 30 questions that rates the overall quality of life in cancer participants. The first 28 questions use a 4-point scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) for evaluating function (physical, role, social, cognitive, emotional), symptoms (diarrhea, fatigue, dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, nausea/vomiting, constipation, and pain) and financial difficulties. The last 2 questions use a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent) to evaluate overall health and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0 to 100 using a standard EORTC algorithm. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status/quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Number of Partricipants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs)

TEAEs were AEs that occurred (or worsened, if present at baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 28 days after the last dose. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with use of study treatment, whether or not related to the treatment. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect. An irAE was any unfavorable and unintended immune-related sign, symptom, or disease (new or worsening) temporally associated with study therapy, regardless of whether a causal relationship with the therapy could be determined.

Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to a TEAE in pMMR Participants

TEAEs was defined as those AEs that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment.

Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to a TEAE in All-comer Participants

TEAEs was defined as those AEs that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical study participant temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment.

Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months

Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity in pMMR Participants

Time to treatment failure due to toxicity was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs.

Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months

Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity in All-comer Participants

Time to treatment failure due to toxicity was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs.

Time frame: Up to approximately 77 months

Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib Versus Time in All-comer Participants

Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. Individual predicted plasma concentration of lenvatinib was then derived from the PK model.

Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1 0.5-4 hours (h), 6-10 postdose; Cycle 1 day 15 predose; Cycle 1 day 15 2-12h postdose, Cycle 2 day 1 predose, 0.5-4h, 6-10 h (Each cycle is 21 days)

Plasma Concentration of Lenvatinib Versus Time in pMMR Participants

PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. Individual predicted plasma concentration of lenvatinib was then derived from the PK model.

Time frame: Cycle 1 day 1 0.5-4 hour (h), 6-10 postdose; Cycle 1 day 15 predose; Cycle 1 day 15 2-12h postdose, Cycle 2 day 1 predose, 0.5-4h, 6-10 h (Each cycle is 21 days)

Model Predicted Apparent Total Clearance (CL/F) for Lenvatinib

Sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. Individual predicted CL/F for lenvatinib was then derived from the PK model. The data was collected and analyzed for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm only.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: 0-12 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: 0.5-10 hours post-dose (each cycle length=21 days)

Model Predicted Area Under the Plasma Drug Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Lenvatinib

Sparse PK samples were collected and analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate PK parameters. Individual predicted AUC for lenvatinib was then derived from the PK model. The data was collected and analyzed for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab arm only.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1: 0.5-10 hours post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 15: 0-12 hours post-dose; Cycle 2 Day 1: 0.5-10 hours post-dose (each cycle length=21 days)

Locations

Arizona Oncology Associates, PC- HAL, Phoenix, United States

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

University of California Los Angeles, Santa Monica, United States

Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale New Haven, New Haven, United States

University of Miami Health System, Miami, United States

Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, Orlando, United States

Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, United States

North Shore University Health System, Evanston, United States

University Medical Center New Orleans, New Orleans, United States

Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, United States

Maryland Oncology Hematology, P.A., Wheaton, United States

John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Med Ctr, Hackensack, United States

Holy Name Medical Center, Teaneck, United States

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

University of Rochester, Rochester, United States

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States

Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, United States

Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Eugene, United States

Sanford Gynecology Oncology, Sioux Falls, United States

UT West Cancer Center, Germantown, United States

Texas Oncology-South Austin, Austin, United States

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, United States

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

Texas Oncology-San Antonio Medical Center, San Antonio, United States

Utah Cancer Specialists, Salt Lake City, United States

Centro de Oncologia e Investigacion Buenos Aires COIBA, Berazategui, Argentina

Hospital Privado de la Comunidad, Mar del Plata, Argentina

Instituto de Investigaciones Metabolicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Instituto de Oncologia Angel H. Roffo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Instituto Medico Especializado Alexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Centro Oncologico Riojano Integral, La Rioja, Argentina

Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Royal Brisbane and Women s Hospital, Herston, Australia

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

St John of God, Subiaco, Australia

Hospital Araujo Jorge, Goiânia, Brazil

Instituto Nacional do Cancer II, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Uniao Brasileira de Educacao e Assistencia Hospital Sao Lucas da Pucrs, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Fundacao Dr Amaral Carvalho, Jaú, Brazil

Instituto do Cancer de Sao Paulo - ICESP, São Paulo, Brazil

Clinica de Pesquisas e Ctro de Estudos Onc. Ginecol. e Mamaria Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada

Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada

Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Canada

Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Canada

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada

CIUSSS de l Est de L Ile de Montreal - Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada

Centre Hospitalier de l Universite de Montreal - CHUM, Montreal, Canada

Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada

CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval-Hotel Dieu de Quebec, Québec, Canada

Clinica del Country, Bogota, Colombia

Fundacion Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia

Biomelab S A S, Barranquilla, Colombia

Clinica Colsanitas S.A. - Sede Clinica Universitaria Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

Rodrigo Botero SAS, Medellín, Colombia

Fundacion Colombiana de Cancerologia Clinica Vida, Medellín, Colombia

Oncomedica S.A., Montería, Colombia

Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France

Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Francois Baclesse, Caen, France

Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France

Institut Regional du Cancer de Montpellier - ICM, Montpellier, France

Hopital prive du Confluent, Nantes, France

Groupe Hospitalier Broca Cochin Hotel Dieu, Paris, France

Hopital Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France

Centre Armoricain de Radiotherapie Imagerie medicale et Oncologie, Plérin, France

Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

EISAI Trial Site 4, Berlin, Germany

EISAI Trial Site 2, Dresden, Germany

EISAI Trial Site 1, Erlangen, Germany

EISAI Trial Site 6, Hamburg, Germany

EISAI Trial Site 3, Rostock, Germany

EISAI Trial Site 5, Tübingen, Germany

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Soroka Medical Center, Beersheba, Israel

Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel

Hadassah Medical Center. Ein Kerem, Jerusalem, Israel

Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel

Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

Azienda Ospedaliera per l Emergenza Cannizzaro, Catania, Italy

Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy

Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy

Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy

Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Roma, Italy

EISAI Trial Site 9, Nagoya, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 18, Kashiwa, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 7, Matsuyama, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 15, Tōon, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 5, Kurume, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 11, Sapporo, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 8, Akashi, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 17, Tsukuba, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 4, Morioka, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 19, Isehara, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 14, Sendai, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 1, Hidaka, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 2, Sunto-gun, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 16, Kagoshima, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 3, Niigata, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 10, Tokyo, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 12, Tokyo, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 13, Tokyo, Japan

EISAI Trial Site 6, Tokyo, Japan

Investigacion Onco Farmaceutica S de RL de CV, La Paz, Mexico

Alivia Clinica de Alta Especialidad S.A. de C.V., Monterrey, Mexico

Grupo Medico Camino SC, Mexico City, Mexico

Centro Hemato Oncologico Privado, Toluca, Mexico

Faicic S de RL de CV, Veracruz, Mexico

Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Centrum Onkologii Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej Curie, Krakow, Poland

Centrum Onkologii. Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie, Warsaw, Poland

Beskidzkie Centrum Onkologii im. Jana Pawla II, Bielsko-Biala, Poland

Szpital Morski im. PCK Szpitale Wojewodzkie w Gdyni Sp. z o.o., Gdynia, Poland

Centrum Onkologii Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej Curie, Gliwice, Poland

Instytut Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki, Lodz, Poland

Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny w Szczecinie, Szczecin, Poland

Szpital Kliniczny im Ks Anny Mazowieckiej, Warsaw, Poland

Altay Regional Oncology Dispensary, Barnaul, Russia

Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Tatarstan MoH, Kazan', Russia

FSBI National Medical Oncology Research Center n.a. N.N. Blokhina, Moscow, Russia

FSBI-FRCC of Special Types Med. Care & Technologies FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Leningrad Regional Oncology Center, Saint Petersburg, Russia

SPb SBHI City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Mordovia Republican Oncological Dispensary, Saransk, Russia

Tomsk National Research Medical Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia

Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, Russia

National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, South Korea

Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Instituto Catalan de Oncologia ICO - Hospital Duran i Reynals, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Hospital General Universitari Vall d Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain

Clinica Universitaria Navarra - Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain

Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital of the C.G.M.F., Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Chang Gung Medical Foundation. Linkou Branch, Taoyuan District, Taiwan

Basken Adana Dr.Turgut Noyan Uygulama ve Arastirma Merkezi, Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)

Hacettepe University Medical Faculty, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Baskent Universitesi Ankara Hastanesi, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Acibadem Bursa Hastanesi, Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)

Acibadem Universitesi Atakent Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Florence Nightingale Gayrettepe Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom

Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Barts Health NHS Trust - St Bartholomew s Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Guy s & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

The Royal Marsden Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom

Lenvatinib in Combination With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice in Participants With Advanced Endometrial Cancer (MK-3475-775/E7080-G000-309 Per Merck Standard Convention [KEYNOTE-775])