BRCBradley R. Corr
Papers(11)
WNT4 Regulates Cellul…Randomized Phase II S…Homologous recombinat…Training, Validating,…Efficacy and Safety o…Bridging the Gap from…Inhibiting Wnt/beta‐c…The efficacy and safe…ADAGIO: A Phase IIb, …Survival and clinical…Targeting Tryptophan …
Collaborators(10)
Casey M. CosgroveBenjamin G. BitlerAmit M. OzaStephanie LheureuxDavid E. CohnDavid M. O'MalleyElizabeth R. WoodruffErin GeorgeEugenia GirdaFabian R. Villagomez
Institutions(7)
University Of Colorad…The Ohio State Univer…University Health Net…The Ohio State Univer…University of Colorad…Moffitt Cancer CenterRutgers Cancer Instit…

Papers

WNT4 Regulates Cellular Metabolism via Intracellular Activity at the Mitochondria in Breast and Gynecologic Cancers

Abstract Wnt ligand WNT4 is critical in female reproductive tissue development, with WNT4 dysregulation linked to related pathologies including breast cancer (invasive lobular carcinoma, ILC) and gynecologic cancers. WNT4 signaling in these contexts is distinct from canonical Wnt signaling yet inadequately understood. We previously identified atypical intracellular activity of WNT4 (independent of Wnt secretion) regulating mitochondrial function, and herein examine intracellular functions of WNT4. We further examine how convergent mechanisms of WNT4 dysregulation impact cancer metabolism. In ILC, WNT4 is co-opted by estrogen receptor α (ER) via genomic binding in WNT4 intron 1, while in gynecologic cancers, a common genetic polymorphism (rs3820282) at this ER binding site alters WNT4 regulation. Using proximity biotinylation (BioID), we show canonical Wnt ligand WNT3A is trafficked for secretion, but WNT4 is localized to the cytosol and mitochondria. We identified DHRS2, mTOR, and STAT1 as putative WNT4 cytosolic/mitochondrial signaling partners. Whole metabolite profiling, and integrated transcriptomic data, support that WNT4 mediates metabolic reprogramming via fatty acid and amino acid metabolism. Furthermore, ovarian cancer cell lines with rs3820282 variant genotype are WNT4 dependent and have active WNT4 metabolic signaling. In protein array analyses of a cohort of 103 human gynecologic tumors enriched for patient diversity, germline rs3820282 genotype is associated with metabolic remodeling. Variant genotype tumors show increased AMPK activation and downstream signaling, with the highest AMPK signaling activity in variant genotype tumors from non-White patients. Taken together, atypical intracellular WNT4 signaling, in part via genetic dysregulation, regulates the distinct metabolic phenotypes of ILC and gynecologic cancers. Significance: WNT4 regulates breast and gynecologic cancer metabolism via a previously unappreciated intracellular signaling mechanism at the mitochondria, with WNT4 mediating metabolic remodeling. Understanding WNT4 dysregulation by estrogen and genetic polymorphism offers new opportunities for defining tumor biology, precision therapeutics, and personalized cancer risk assessment.

Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab with Weekly Anetumab Ravtansine or Weekly Paclitaxel in Platinum-Resistant/Refractory High-Grade Ovarian Cancer (NCI Trial)

Abstract Purpose: Mesothelin (MSLN) is highly expressed in high-grade serous/endometrioid ovarian cancers (HGOC). Anetumab ravtansine (AR) is an antibody–drug conjugate directed at the MSLN antigen with a tubulin polymerization inhibitor. We assessed the safety, activity, and pharmacokinetics of the combination AR/bevacizumab (Bev; ARB) versus weekly paclitaxel/Bev (PB) in patients with platinum-resistant/refractory HGOC (prrHGOC). Patients and Methods: Following a run-in phase I study to assess ARB safety, patients with prrHGOC with centrally confirmed MSLN-positive expression were randomized to ARB or PB (weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with Bev 10 mg/kg biweekly). Patients were stratified by platinum resistance/refractory and prior Bev. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall response rate, safety, and blood-based angiome biomarker assessment. A futility analysis was planned after 35 PFS events. Results: The combination of Bev (10 mg/kg) biweekly with AR (2.2 mg/kg) weekly was well tolerated. About phase II results, MSLN positivity was 88%, and 57 patients were randomized (28 ARB and 29 PB). Forty-two percentage of patients received prior Bev, and 23% were platinum-refractory. At futility analysis, the median PFS was 5.3 and 12.7 months for ARB and PB, respectively [P = 0.03; HR = 2.02 (1.06–3.86)]. The overall response rate was 21% with ARB and 65% with PB. The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were anemia (18%) with ARB and neutropenia (24%) with PB. Higher baseline levels of circulating IL6 were associated with worse PFS, and its levels decreased with PB treatment. Conclusions: Our study stopped at interim analysis highlighting the benefit of PB in prrHGOC as the standard of care.

Homologous recombination deficiency in endometrial cancer: shedding light on recent clinical findings

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with rising incidence and high recurrence rates. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) benefit patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors, but options remain limited for those with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) disease. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), a genomic instability phenotype, has emerged as a therapeutic target. Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are being investigated in endometrial cancer, with studies exploring whether HRD predicts response, particularly in combination with ICIs or chemotherapy. This review examines HRD in endometrial cancer, focusing on its molecular basis, clinical implications, and emerging therapeutic strategies. HRD occurs in a sub-set of endometrial cancers, particularly non-endometrioid sub-types, and is linked to genomic instability and platinum sensitivity. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) molecular classification has improved understanding of HRD prevalence across sub-types. HRD testing remains challenging due to a lack of standardization, with current methods including genomic-scar assays, next-generation sequencing, and functional assays. Clinical trials, such as DUO-E and RUBY-2, suggest that PARPi combined with ICIs or chemotherapy may improve outcomes in pMMR tumors, whereas PARPi monotherapy offers limited benefits. Resistance to PARPi is common, driven by the restoration of homologous recombination repair, replication fork stabilization, and drug efflux. HRD is a promising biomarker and therapeutic target in endometrial cancer. Evidence supports the integration of PARPi for select populations, although further research is needed to refine testing, optimize patient selection, and overcome resistance. Future trials should prioritize predictive biomarkers and novel combinations to maximize the benefits of PARPi in HRD endometrial cancer.

Training, Validating, and Testing Machine Learning Prediction Models for Endometrial Cancer Recurrence

PURPOSE Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the United States with rising incidence and mortality. Despite optimal treatment, 15%-20% of all patients will recur. To better select patients for adjuvant therapy, it is important to accurately predict patients at risk for recurrence. Our objective was to train, validate, and test models of EC recurrence using lasso regression and other machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) analytics in a large, comprehensive data set. METHODS Data from patients with EC were downloaded from the Oncology Research Information Exchange Network database and stratified into low risk, The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade 1 and 2, stage I (N = 329); high risk, or FIGO grade 3 or stages II, III, IV (N = 324); and nonendometrioid histology (N = 239) groups. Clinical, pathologic, genomic, and genetic data were used for the analysis. Genomic data included microRNA, long noncoding RNA, isoforms, and pseudogene expressions. Genetic variation included single-nucleotide variation (SNV) and copy-number variation (CNV). In the discovery phase, we selected variables informative for recurrence ( P < .05), using univariate analyses of variance. Then, we trained, validated, and tested multivariate models using selected variables and lasso regression, MATLAB (ML), and TensorFlow (DL). RESULTS Recurrence clinic models for low-risk, high-risk, and high-risk nonendometrioid histology had AUCs of 56%, 70%, and 65%, respectively. For training, we selected models with AUC >80%: five for the low-risk group, 20 models for the high-risk group, and 20 for the nonendometrioid group. The two best low-risk models included clinical data and CNVs. For the high-risk group, three of the five best-performing models included pseudogene expression. For the nonendometrioid group, pseudogene expression and SNV were overrepresented in the best models. CONCLUSION Prediction models of EC recurrence built with ML and DL analytics had better performance than models with clinical and pathologic data alone. Prospective validation is required to determine clinical utility.

Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors (TROPiCS-03): Analysis in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE Patients with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) who progress on or after platinum-based therapy and immunotherapy have poor prognosis. We report efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2)–directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with advanced EC. METHODS TROPiCS-03 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03964727 ) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II basket study in patients with metastatic solid tumors. Eligible patients in the EC cohort received SG 10 mg/kg once on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by investigator's assessment per RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete and partial response, and stable disease ≥6 months), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator assessment, overall survival, and safety. Trop-2 expression of archival or baseline tumor specimens was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS At data extraction date, 41 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.7-19.3); median previous therapies was three (range, 1-6); and 85% of patients received previous chemotherapy and immunotherapy. ORR was 22% (95% CI, 11 to 38); CBR was 32% (95% CI, 18 to 48). Median DOR was 8.8 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not estimable); median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.8 to 9.8). Trop-2 exploratory analysis was conducted retrospectively for 39 patients. Tumor Trop-2 protein was highly expressed in EC, showing limited correlation with efficacy. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 73% of patients. Study drug discontinuation due to TRAEs was 5%. Two deaths occurred, deemed unrelated to SG. CONCLUSION Findings from TROPiCS-03 showed encouraging efficacy of SG with a manageable toxicity profile in a heavily pretreated population with advanced EC. Safety findings were consistent with the known SG safety profile.

Bridging the Gap from Bench to Bedside: A Call for In Vivo Preclinical Models to Advance Endometrial Cancer and Cervical Cancer Immuno-oncology Research

Abstract Advanced-stage endometrial and cervical cancers are associated with poor outcomes despite contemporary advances in surgical techniques and therapeutics. Recent clinical trial results have led to a shift in the treatment paradigm for both malignancies, in which immunotherapy is now incorporated as the standard of care up front for most patients with advanced endometrial and cervical cancers as the standard of care. Impressive response rates have been observed, but unfortunately, a subset of patients do not benefit from immunotherapy, and survival remains poor. Continued preclinical research and clinical trial development are crucial for our understanding of resistance mechanisms to immunotherapy and maximization of therapeutic efficacy. In this setting, syngeneic models are preferred over xenograft models as they allow for the evaluation of the tumor–immune interaction in an immunocompetent host, most closely mimicking the tumor–immune interaction in patients with cancer. Unfortunately, significant disparities exist about syngeneic models in gynecologic malignancy, in which queries from multiple large bioscience companies confirm no commercial availability of endometrial or cervical cancer syngeneic cell lines. Published data exist about the recent development of several endometrial and cervical cancer syngeneic cell lines, warranting further investigation. Closing the disparity gap for preclinical models in endometrial and cervical cancers will support physician scientists, basic and translational researchers, and clinical trialists who are dedicated to improving outcomes for our patients with advanced disease and poor prognosis.

Inhibiting Wnt/beta‐catenin in CTNNB1‐mutated endometrial cancer

AbstractThe role of β‐catenin/TCF transcriptional activity in endometrial cancer (EC) recurrence is not well understood. We assessed the impact of Wnt/β‐catenin inhibition in EC models. In an analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas, we confirmed that CTNNB1 mutations are enriched in recurrent low‐risk EC and showed that aberrant Wnt/β‐catenin pathway activation is associated with recurrence. We studied CTNNB1‐wildtype (HEC1B, Ishikawa) and CTNNB1‐mutant (HEC108, HEC265, HEC1B‐S33Y, Ishikawa‐S33Y) EC cell lines. Dose response curves were determined for 5 Wnt/β‐catenin pathway inhibitors (Wnt‐C59, XAV‐939, PyrPam, PRI‐724, SM04690). XAV939, Wnt‐C59 and PyrPam inhibited function upstream of β‐catenin transcriptional activity and were ineffective at inhibiting cell viability. In contrast, PRI724 and SM04690 indirectly inhibited β‐catenin transcriptional activity and significantly reduced cell viability in CTNNB1‐mutant cell lines. Treatment with SM04690 reduced cell viability (Licor Cell stain) in all EC cell lines, but viability was significantly lower in CTNNB1‐mutant cell lines (p < 0.01). Mechanistically, SM04690 significantly inhibited proliferation measured via 5′‐bromo‐2′‐deoxyuridine incorporation and reduced T cell factor (TCF) transcriptional activity. HEC1B, HEC1B‐S33Y and HEC265 tumor‐bearing mice were treated with vehicle or SM04690. Tumors treated with SM04690 had smaller mean volumes than those treated with vehicle (p < 0.001, p = 0.014, p = 0.06). In HEC1B‐S33Y and HEC265 tumors, SM04690 treatment significantly reduced Ki67 H‐scores compared to vehicle (p = 0.035, p = 0.024). Targeting the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in CTNNB1‐mutant EC effectively inhibited proliferation and β‐catenin/TCF transcriptional activity and blunted tumor progression in in vivo models. These studies suggest β‐catenin transcriptional inhibitors are effective in EC and particularly in CTNNB1‐mutant EC, highlighting a potential therapeutic vulnerability for treatment of CTNNB1‐mutant EC.

The efficacy and safety of mirvetuximab soravtansine in FRα-positive, third-line and later, recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: the single-arm phase II PICCOLO trial

Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) is a first-in-class, folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeting antibody-drug conjugate with United States Food and Drug Administration approval for FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PICCOLO is a phase II, global, open-label, single-arm trial of MIRV as third-line or greater (≥3L) treatment in patients with FRα-positive (≥75% of cells with ≥2+ staining intensity) recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC). Participants received MIRV (6 mg/kg adjusted ideal body weight every 3 weeks) until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoint was investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR). Additional endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Analyses of subgroups by disease characteristics (e.g. platinum-free interval) and treatment history [e.g. prior bevacizumab and poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment] were exploratory. Seventy-nine participants were enrolled and efficacy assessable. The primary endpoint was met; ORR was 51.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 40.4% to 63.3%]. Median DOR was 8.25 months (95% CI 5.55-10.78 months) and median PFS was 6.93 months (95% CI 5.85-9.59 months). OS was not mature at data cut-off. ORR was 45.8% (95% CI 32.7% to 59.2%) in participants with PD while on/within 30 days of prior PARPi (n = 59) and 60.0% (95% CI 14.7% to 94.7%) in those without PD with prior PARPi (n = 5). No new safety signals occurred; most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were gastrointestinal, neurosensory, and resolvable ocular events. TEAEs led to discontinuation in 13 participants (16%) and death in 2 participants (3%). MIRV as ≥3L treatment in heavily pretreated recurrent FRα-positive PSOC demonstrated notable efficacy and tolerable safety, including among those with prior PD on or within 30 days of PARPi (NCT05041257).

ADAGIO: A Phase IIb, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Adavosertib (AZD1775) as Treatment for Recurrent or Persistent Uterine Serous Carcinoma

PURPOSE This phase IIb, single-arm, multicenter, global study (ADAGIO; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04590248 ) assessed the efficacy and safety of adavosertib in patients with recurrent/persistent uterine serous carcinoma (USC) who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS Eligible patients were age 18 years and older and had histologically confirmed recurrent/persistent USC, previously treated with at least one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, and with evidence of measurable disease. Adavosertib was administered orally at 300 mg once daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 21-day cycle until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and tolerability. Biomarkers previously associated with adavosertib response in other settings were assessed in archival tissue samples. RESULTS In 104 evaluable patients, one complete response and 26 partial responses were observed, for an ORR by BICR of 26.0% (95% CI, 17.9 to 35.5). Median DoR was 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.8 to 8.3); median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 3.9). Biomarker analysis identified no single predictive alteration for adavosertib response, although a trend was observed for CCNE1 amplification or high cyclin E1 protein expression. Most patients (97.2%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), most frequently diarrhea (59.6%), nausea (59.6%), and anemia (58.7%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 60.6% of patients, with neutropenia (21.1%) and fatigue (13.8%) most common. 17.4% of patients discontinued adavosertib due to AEs (treatment-related in 14.7%). CONCLUSION Adavosertib showed some antitumor activity in patients with recurrent/persistent USC. However, at 300 mg once daily dosing, it was not well tolerated in this population. Exploratory biomarker studies suggest CCNE1 /cyclin E1 expression may enrich for response to Wee1 inhibition in USC.

Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials

BackgroundPatients with ovarian cancer who are enrolled on phase 1 trials typically have platinum‐resistant and heavily pretreated disease, with a poor prognosis. In the current study, the authors assessed prognostic factors and survival in women with recurrent ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials.MethodsThe authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients treated from 2008 through 2018 at the University of Colorado Cancer Center. Patient characteristics and treatment and toxicity‐related survival data were assessed. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors associated with survival time.ResultsA total of 132 patients were treated on phase 1 clinical trials. Patients had a median age of 59 years (range, 33‐88 years) with a median of 5.5 previous chemotherapy lines (range, 1‐13 lines). Of the 132 patients, 53 (40%) were treated on multiple phase 1 trials with a median of 1 (range, 0‐5) prior phase 1 trial. The overall response rate was 14.7%. The median overall survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.1‐13.4 months). Two patients died on trial due to progression of disease whereas no patients died of treatment‐related toxicity. Independent risk factors found to be predictive of shorter survival were an elevated cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6‐5.2) and albumin <3.5 g/dL (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.65‐3.79). A body mass index >25 kg/m2 was predictive of longer survival (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.44‐0.96).ConclusionsIn the current single‐institution series, patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials experienced a median overall survival of 11.3 months. When available, phase 1 clinical trials represent a reasonable treatment option for patients with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer with a preserved performance status.

Targeting Tryptophan Catabolism in Ovarian Cancer to Attenuate Macrophage Infiltration and PD-L1 Expression

Abstract High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) of the fallopian tube, ovary, and peritoneum is the most common type of ovarian cancer and is predicted to be immunogenic because the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes conveys a better prognosis. However, the efficacy of immunotherapies has been limited because of the immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment (TME). Tumor metabolism and immune-suppressive metabolites directly affect immune cell function through the depletion of nutrients and activation of immune-suppressive transcriptional programs. Tryptophan (TRP) catabolism is a contributor to HGSC disease progression. Two structurally distinct rate-limiting TRP catabolizing enzymes, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase 2 (TDO2), evolved separately to catabolize TRP. IDO1/TDO2 are aberrantly expressed in carcinomas and metabolize TRP into the immune-suppressive metabolite kynurenine (KYN), which can engage the aryl hydrocarbon receptor to drive immunosuppressive transcriptional programs. To date, IDO inhibitors tested in clinical trials have had limited efficacy, but those inhibitors did not target TDO2, and we find that HGSC cell lines and clinical outcomes are more dependent on TDO2 than IDO1. To identify inflammatory HGSC cancers with poor prognosis, we stratified patient ascites samples by IL6 status, which correlates with poor prognosis. Metabolomics revealed that IL6-high patient samples had enriched KYN. TDO2 knockdown significantly inhibited HGSC growth and TRP catabolism. The orally available dual IDO1/TDO2 inhibitor, AT-0174, significantly inhibited tumor progression, reduced tumor-associated macrophages, and reduced expression of immune-suppressive proteins on immune and tumor cells. These studies demonstrate the importance of TDO2 and the therapeutic potential of AT-0174 to overcome an immune-suppressed TME. Significance: Developing strategies to improve response to chemotherapy is essential to extending disease-free intervals for patients with HGSC of the fallopian tube, ovary, and peritoneum. In this article, we demonstrate that targeting TRP catabolism, particularly with dual inhibition of TDO2 and IDO1, attenuates the immune-suppressive microenvironment and, when combined with chemotherapy, extends survival compared with chemotherapy alone.

125Works
11Papers
95Collaborators
1Trials
Ovarian NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysDisease ProgressionUterine Neoplasms

Education

2009

Vanderbilt University