Alvaro N Monteiro

Variants of uncertain clinical significance in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes: best practices in functional analysis for clinical annotation

Germline DNA tests to identify pathogenic variants in genes linked to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility have become widely available. However, the clinical utility of genetic testing depends on reliable evidence-based classification of sequence variants. Determination of pathogenicity traditionally relies on painstaking pedigree-based segregation analyses. However, the rapid increase in usage of germline DNA tests has led to the discovery of a large number of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS). For most VUS there is insufficient information for segregation analysis and therefore assessment of functional consequences is increasingly being used to support clinical annotation. Functional assays need to be accurate, robust, and reproducible to be used for clinical purposes. Here we use the lessons learned from

Integration of functional assay data results provides strong evidence for classification of hundreds of BRCA1 variants of uncertain significance

BRCA1 pathogenic variant heterozygotes are at a substantially increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer. The widespread uptake of testing has led to a significant increase in the detection of missense variants in BRCA1, the vast majority of which are variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS), posing a challenge to genetic counseling. Here, we harness a wealth of functional data for thousands of variants to aid in variant classification. We have collected, curated, and harmonized functional data for 2701 missense variants representing 24.5% of possible missense variants in BRCA1. Results were harmonized across studies by converting data into binary categorical variables (functional impact versus no functional impact). Using a panel of reference variants we identified a subset of assays with high sensitivity and specificity (≥80%) and apply the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant interpretation guidelines to assign evidence criteria for classification. Integration of data from validated assays provided ACMG/AMP evidence criteria in favor of pathogenicity for 297 variants or against pathogenicity for 2058 representing 96.2% of current VUS functionally assessed. We also explore discordant results and identify limitations in the approach. High quality functional data are available for BRCA1 missense variants and provide evidence for classification of 2355 VUS according to their pathogenicity.

Scratching Below the Ovarian Cancer GWAS Surface

Abstract Despite recent notable treatment advancements, ovarian cancer survival rates remain poor, with about half of women surviving five years after diagnosis. Uncovering novel prognostic factors is critical to better understand and reduce mortality from this deadly disease. While genome-wide association studies have identified numerous loci associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer, the investigation of genetic factors associated with outcomes among women with ovarian cancer has been limited due to several challenges summarized in the present commentary. Using data from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Quinn and colleagues conducted a genome-wide association study of patients with ovarian cancer receiving debulking surgery and standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment, revealing a locus at 12q24.33 associated with progression-free survival. Experimental evidence suggests that ULK1, a gene coding for a serine/threonine kinase implicated in autophagy, is the target of the association. We discuss the novelty of these findings, unanswered questions, and next steps for the road ahead in translating the work of Quinn and colleagues into clinical practice. See related article by Quinn et al., p. 1669

BRCA1 frameshift variants leading to extended incorrect protein C termini

Carriers of BRCA1 germline pathogenic variants are at substantially higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer than the general population. Accurate identification of at-risk individuals is crucial for risk stratification and the implementation of targeted preventive and therapeutic interventions. Despite significant progress in variant classification efforts, a sizable portion of reported BRCA1 variants remain as variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUSs). Variants leading to premature protein termination and loss of essential functional domains are typically classified as pathogenic. However, the impact of frameshift variants that result in an extended incorrect terminus is not clear. Using validated functional assays, we conducted a systematic functional assessment of 17 previously reported BRCA1 extended incorrect terminus variants (EITs) and concluded that 16 constitute loss-of-function variants. This suggests that most EITs are likely to be pathogenic. However, one variant, c.5578dup, displayed a protein expression level, affinity to known binding partners, and activity in transcription and homologous recombination assays comparable to the wild-type BRCA1 protein. Twenty-three additional carriers of c.5578dup were identified at a US clinical diagnostic lab and assessed using a family history likelihood model providing, in combination with the functional data, a likely benign interpretation. These results, consistent with family history data in the current study and available data from ClinVar, indicate that most, but not all, BRCA1 variants leading to an extended incorrect terminus constitute loss-of-function variants and underscore the need for comprehensive assessment of individual variants.

Functional evaluation and clinical classification of BRCA2 variants

Germline BRCA2 loss-of function variants, which can be identified through clinical genetic testing, predispose to several cancers