Alexandra Leary

Early Clinical and Molecular Biomarkers in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: CHIVA Phase II GINECO Trial

PURPOSE Platinum-based chemotherapy and surgery are pivotal in managing ovarian cancer (OC), yet prognosis remains poor, and early biomarkers for platinum resistance are needed. The neoadjuvant setting provides an opportunity to evaluate tumor responsiveness to platinum chemotherapy in vivo. This study evaluated whether early measures of platinum response combined with molecular alterations could predict surgical outcomes and survival in patients with OC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS The CHIVA study enrolled stage III/IV OC patients eligible for three cycles NACT with or without nintedanib, followed by interval debulking surgery. Archival samples underwent extensive sequencing to detect clinically relevant variants and copy number alterations and calculate genomic instability (GIS). Early chemotherapy response measures—cancer antigen 125 kinetics by KELIM, major pathologic response, GIS status, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) abundance, and genomic alterations—were correlated with surgery completeness and survival. RESULTS Among 127 patients, the overall response rate was 44%, and the complete cytoreduction (CC0) rate was 54.8%. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was identified in 56% of patients and was associated with better survival. The median progression-free survival was 21.4, 20.5, and 14.4 months in the BRCAmut , BRCAwt /GIS-high, and BRCAwt /GIS-low subgroups, respectively ( P = .001). Unfavorable KELIM predicted lower objective response rate, CC0, and shorter survival, while low intraepithelial TILs (ieTILs) correlated with poor outcomes. Multivariate analysis confirmed KELIM, HRD status, and ieTILs as independent biomarkers. CCNE1 amplifications, observed in 20% of patients, were associated with moderate chemotherapy sensitivity. CONCLUSION HRD status, KELIM, and TILs are key independent biomarkers in advanced OC. CCNE1 amplifications, although typically associated with platinum resistance, were linked to moderate chemotherapy sensitivity, defining an intermediate prognostic subgroup.

Pharmacologic Inhibition of SIRT1 Limits the Growth of Tumoral and Metastatic Granulosa Cells by Affecting mTOR, Myc, and E2F Pathways

Abstract Clinical management of patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumor (GCT) remains poor. Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1), a deacetylase enzyme involved in the regulation of tumor growth and metastasis, may represent a therapeutic target because of the availability of selective pharmacologic inhibitors with minimal toxicity. We assessed the possible overexpression of SIRT1 during tumorigenesis by Western blotting and IHC. We tested the effects of SIRT1 inhibition by EX-527 on growth, proliferation, death, migration, metabolism, and gene expression by RNA sequencing in vitro on three GCT cell lines (AT29, KGN, and COV434). Tumor growth in response to EX-527 treatment was examined in nude mice carrying subcutaneous GCT cell grafts using an electronic caliper and in GCT of AT83 mice by three-dimensional ultrasound imaging system. SIRT1 abundance increased during tumorigenesis. In vitro treatment with EX-527 efficiently reduced cell growth, either by inducing apoptosis or by inhibiting proliferation. EX-527 induced alterations in mTOR-, Myc-, and E2F-driven pathways, and in those controlling cell metabolism and oxidative stress. The administration of this treatment for 4 weeks efficiently reduced tumor progression in vivo. Inhibition of SIRT1 activity may have GCT growth suppressive effects, providing a rationale for evaluating the therapeutic potential of drugs targeting SIRT1 in patients.

Controversies in the management of mucinous ovarian tumors

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, comprising less than 5% of all cases, and distinguished by its unique molecular, histologic, and clinical features. Its rarity and marked differences from other ovarian cancer subtypes have led to significant controversies regarding its diagnosis, surgical strategies, and systemic therapies. Accurate differentiation between primary and metastatic MOCs remains a critical challenge because of their overlapping features with gastrointestinal cancers, often leading to misclassification. This can result in suboptimal management and impaired patient outcomes, thus highlighting the importance of high-quality pathologic reviews. The surgical approach to MOC is highly controversial. In early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery should be systematically considered in young patients, although its feasibility requires careful consideration. In addition, systematic staging lymphadenectomy, which has been de-escalated for patients with expansile MOC, is recommended for those with early-stage infiltrative MOC. In advanced-stage disease, where tumors are often bulky and chemoresistant, the benefits of extensive cytoreduction must be balanced against surgical morbidities. MOC poses significant challenges for systemic treatment owing to its poor response rate to standard ovarian cancer chemotherapy regimens. Alternative therapeutic strategies offer promise but lack robust clinical validation, including gastrointestinal-based regimens, HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (eg, trastuzumab deruxtecan), and immune checkpoint inhibitors for microsatellite unstable MOC. Furthermore, pre-clinical and early phase trials have suggested the potential of combination strategies, including RAS pathway and WEE1 inhibitors. Addressing these controversies requires a multidisciplinary approach that underscores the importance of histologic subtyping and molecular profiling to guide personalized treatment. International collaboration is essential for overcoming the rarity of MOC by enabling larger studies and global registries. These efforts are pivotal for improving diagnostic accuracy, expanding therapeutic options, and, ultimately, enhancing outcomes in patients with this challenging malignancy.

Prevalence and Prognosis of Lynch Syndrome and Sporadic Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer

Abstract Background Standard screening of endometrial cancer (EC) for Lynch syndrome (LS) is gaining traction; however, the prognostic impact of an underlying hereditary etiology is unknown. We established the prevalence, prognosis, and subsequent primary cancer incidence of patients with LS-associated EC in relation to sporadic mismatch repair deficient (MMRd)-EC in the large combined Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma-1, -2, and -3 trial cohort. Methods After MMR-immunohistochemistry, MLH1-promoter methylation testing, and next-generation sequencing, tumors were classified into 3 groups according to the molecular cause of their MMRd-EC. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox model were used for survival analysis. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate the subsequent cancer probability. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Among the 1336 ECs, 410 (30.7%) were MMRd. A total of 380 (92.7%) were fully triaged: 275 (72.4%) were MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-ECs; 36 (9.5%) LS MMRd-ECs, and 69 (18.2%) MMRd-ECs due to other causes. Limiting screening of EC patients to 60 years or younger or to 70 years or younger would have resulted in missing 18 (50.0%) and 6 (16.7%) LS diagnoses, respectively. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.1% to 100%; hazard ratio = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.16 to 1.24, P = .12) for LS, 95.5% (95% CI = 90.7% to 100%; hazard ratio = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.55, P = .003) for “other” vs 78.6% (95% CI = 73.8% to 83.7%) for MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC. The probability of subsequent LS-associated cancer at 10 years was 11.6% (95% CI = 0.0% to 24.7%), 1.5% (95% CI = 0.0% to 4.3%), and 7.0% (95% CI = 3.0% to 10.9%) within the LS, “other,” and MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC groups, respectively. Conclusions The LS prevalence in the Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma trial population was 2.8% and among MMRd-ECs was 9.5%. Patients with LS-associated ECs showed a trend towards better recurrence-free survival and higher risk for second cancers compared with patients with MLH1-hypermethylated MMRd-EC.

Assessing the Status of Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) From Gene to Protein Level in Ovarian and Endometrial Carcinomas: A Systematic Review

Twenty percent and 45.4% of high-grade ovarian carcinomas (OC) and endometrial carcinomas (EC) exhibit CCNE1 amplification (CCNE1-amp), respectively, which is related to poor prognosis, but could serve as predictive biomarker for response to innovative targeted therapies. However, there is no consensus regarding how to evaluate the CCNE1 status (at the DNA, RNA, and/or protein level). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of CCNE1 status testing in tubo-ovarian neoplasms and EC, comparing their performance for clinical purposes and highlighting the test's interpretation criteria (CRD420250651291). Among the 734 records initially found on PubMed and Google Scholar, 48 reports were finally included. Molecular analyses and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were reported on 9774 tubo-ovarian neoplasms and 750 EC, and 6966 tubo-ovarian neoplasms and 856 EC, respectively. The most frequently morphological used method to detect CCNE1-amp was fluorescent in situ hybridization (13/16 studies, 81.3%), with quite consensual criteria to defined amplification (ie, CCNE1/chromosome 19 ratio ≥2, and/or >8/≥8 copies of CCNE1 per nucleus, and/or ≥4 CCNE1 copies in ≥40% of cells). The proportion of tubo-ovarian neoplasms with CCNE1 immunohistochemical overexpression varied from 13.5% to 96%, and 14.6% to 86.1% in EC. The sensitivity and specificity of CCNE1 IHC to detect/exclude CCNE1-amp varied from 54.5% to 100% and 59.3% to 90.1%, respectively. Given the reported data, CCNE1 overexpression should be considered either when an H-score is ≥100 or when the staining is >60% with >5% of cells strongly stained. Both CCNE1-amp and CCNE1 overexpressions were associated with poor prognosis and with response to Wee1 and CDK2 inhibitors in high-grade serous OC (overall response rate up to 53%, objective response rate of 32%-40%). In contrast, CCNE1 messenger RNA overexpression had no prognostic value. Thus, both CCNE1-amp detection by fluorescent in situ hybridization and CCNE1 protein levels quantification using IHC represent today the most validated tools to determine the CCNE1 status in OC/EC.

Clinical and biological characteristics associated with loss-of-heterozygosity in endometrial cancer

Genomic instability has been identified in a subgroup of endometrial cancers (ECs) that are predominantly We conducted a retrospective analysis of EC patients from France and Singapore. All patients underwent comprehensive molecular profiling using the tumor based FoundationOne CDX panel. The degree of LOH was correlated with molecular and clinicopathologic findings. LOH-high, intermediate and low were defined as ≥14%, 4%-14%, and <4%, respectively. One hundred twelve patients were identified, including 66% Asian and 34% Caucasian. Fifty nine percent had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics III/IV diseases, 34% low-grade endometrioid, 19% high-grade endometrioid, and 15% serous. The 63% and 50% of tumors expressed estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). One percent had a In this large multiethnic cohort, 17% of EC exhibited high LOH and correlated with hormone-receptor-negative tumors and poorer survival rates. LOH may serve as a tool for identifying EC cases with high genomic instability that could potentially benefit from PARP inhibitors.

Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of High-Risk, Recurrent, or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer That Is Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Low

PURPOSE Recent success of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–targeted antibody-drug-conjugate trastuzumab-deruxtecan in HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors has sparked interest in examining the HER2 status of tumors not traditionally associated with HER2 amplification. Despite the increasing number of systemic treatment options, patients with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) still face a poor prognosis. This study evaluates HER2-low status in over 800 EC, correlating HER2 with both molecular and clinical features. METHODS HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and dual in situ hybridization (DISH) on four studies of previously classified high-risk EC (PORTEC-3 and Medical Spectrum Twente cohort), recurrent or metastatic EC (DOMEC), and a primary stage IV cohort. EC was classified as HER2-negative (IHC 0), HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+ without amplification), or HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or DISH-confirmed amplification). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the independence of any prognostic impact of HER2 status. RESULTS HER2 status was determined in 806 EC: 74.8% were HER2-negative, 17.2% HER2-low, and 7.9% HER2-positive. HER2-low was found across all molecular classes and histotypes. The highest rates of HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors were in recurrent or metastatic EC (35.6% and 15.6%), followed by primary stage IV EC (29.9% and 12.4%) and high-risk EC (14.2% and 6.8%). HER2 status had no independent prognostic value. CONCLUSION A quarter of high-risk, metastatic, or recurrent EC exhibited HER2 overexpression. The presence of HER2 overexpression in all clinical and molecular categories highlights the need for broad testing and offers treatment options for a wide range of patients.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alters the balance of effector to suppressor immune cells in advanced ovarian cancer

Abstract Background At diagnosis, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We recently demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) significantly increased stromal TILs. Here, we investigated the impact of NACT on immune subpopulations with a particular focus on the balance of immune-reactive to tolerant subpopulations. Materials and methods Tissue microarrays of EOC (145 pre-NACT, 139 post-NACT) were analyzed for CD3+, CD8+, FOXP3+, CD68+, and CD163+ by immunohistochemistry and CD4+ cells from deduction. Stromal TILs scored as percentage of stromal area, while intra-epithelial TILs scored as number of TILs in contact with tumor cells/HPF. Differences were evaluated by Wilcoxon or Chi square tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired analyses, and cox model for PFS and OS. Results NACT significantly increased stromal CD3+ (p = 0.003) and CD8+ (p = 0.001) and intra-epithelial CD8+ (p = 0.022) and CD68+ (p = 0.0003) infiltration in unmatched samples and among paired samples for stromal CD3+ and CD8+. Neither CD3+, CD8+, CD4+, and CD68+ nor CD163+ expression correlated with outcome at diagnosis or post NACT. Using median value as a cut-off, high stromal CD8+/FOXP3+ ratio (HR = 0.59; p = 0.017) and high stromal CD3+/FOXP3+ ratio post NACT were associated with prolonged PFS (p = 0.0226). The more the balance shifted in favor of effector versus regulatory TILs, the better the survival. Similarly, high CD68+/CD163+ ratio post NACT improved PFS (p = 0.0445). Conclusion NACT has a significant impact on the balance of immune-reactive to immune-tolerant subpopulations and a high ratio of CD8+/FOXP3+, CD3+/FOXP3+, and CD68+/CD163+ post NACT was significantly associated with improved outcomes. Whether this could select patients for immunotherapy in the post-operative setting should be investigated.

CA-125 ELIMination Rate Constant K (KELIM) Is a Marker of Chemosensitivity in Patients with Ovarian Cancer: Results from the Phase II CHIVA Trial

Abstract Purpose: In patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the first-line treatment success will depend on both the tumor-primary chemosensitivity and the completeness of interval debulking surgery (IDS). The modeled CA-125 ELIMination rate constant K (KELIM), calculated with the CA-125 longitudinal kinetics during the first 100 chemotherapy days, is a validated early marker of tumor chemosensitivity. The objective was to investigate the role of the chemosensitivity relative to the success of first-line medical–surgical treatment. Experimental Design: The CA-125 concentrations were prospectively measured in the randomized phase II trial CHIVA (NCT01583322, carboplatin–paclitaxel regimen ± nintedanib, and IDS, n = 188 patients). The KELIM predictive value regarding the tumor response rate, likelihood of complete IDS, risk of subsequent platinum-resistant relapse (PtRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate tests. Results: The data from 134 patients were analyzed. KELIM was an independent and major predictor of subsequent PtRR risk, and of survivals. The final logistic regression model, including KELIM [OR = 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03–0.49] and complete IDS (no vs. yes, OR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11–0.76) highlights the preponderant role of chemosensitivity on the success of the first-line treatment. In patients with highly chemosensitive diseases, the patient prognosis was driven more by the chemotherapy-induced antitumor effects than by the surgery. Conclusions: The tumor-primary chemosensitivity, assessed by the modeled CA-125 KELIM calculated during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (http://www.biomarker-kinetics.org/CA-125-neo), may be a major parameter to consider for decision-making regarding IDS attempt, and selecting patients for treatments meant to reverse the primary chemoresistance. See related commentary by May and Oza, p. 4432

Overall Survival With Maintenance Olaparib at a 7-Year Follow-Up in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer and a BRCA Mutation: The SOLO1/GOG 3004 Trial

PURPOSE In SOLO1/GOG 3004 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01844986 ), maintenance therapy with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib provided a sustained progression-free survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation. We report overall survival (OS) after a 7-year follow-up, a clinically relevant time point and the longest follow-up for any poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in the first-line setting. METHODS This double-blind phase III trial randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation in clinical response to platinum-based chemotherapy to maintenance olaparib (n = 260) or placebo (n = 131) for up to 2 years. A prespecified descriptive analysis of OS, a secondary end point, was conducted after a 7-year follow-up. RESULTS The median duration of treatment was 24.6 months with olaparib and 13.9 months with placebo, and the median follow-up was 88.9 and 87.4 months, respectively. The hazard ratio for OS was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.76; P = .0004 [ P &lt; .0001 required to declare statistical significance]). At 7 years, 67.0% of olaparib patients versus 46.5% of placebo patients were alive, and 45.3% versus 20.6%, respectively, were alive and had not received a first subsequent treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimates). The incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia remained low, and new primary malignancies remained balanced between treatment groups. CONCLUSION Results indicate a clinically meaningful, albeit not statistically significant according to prespecified criteria, improvement in OS with maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation and support the use of maintenance olaparib to achieve long-term remission in this setting; the potential for cure may also be enhanced. No new safety signals were observed during long-term follow-up.

Atezolizumab Combined With Platinum and Maintenance Niraparib for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer With a Platinum-Free Interval &gt;6 Months: ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA Phase III Trial

PURPOSE To evaluate atezolizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) followed by maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS The multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III ENGOT-OV41/GEICO 69-O/ANITA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03598270 ) enrolled patients with measurable high-grade serous, endometrioid, or undifferentiated recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one or two previous CT lines (most recent including platinum) and had a treatment-free interval since last platinum (TFIp) of &gt;6 months. Patients were stratified by investigator-selected carboplatin doublet, TFIp, BRCA status, and PD-L1 status in de novo biopsy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either atezolizumab or placebo throughout standard therapy comprising six cycles of a carboplatin doublet followed (in patients with response/stable disease) by maintenance niraparib until progression. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS Between November 2018 and January 2022, 417 patients were randomly assigned (15% BRCA- mutated, 36% PD-L1–positive, 66% TFIp &gt;12 months, 11% previous poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor after frontline CT, and 53% previous bevacizumab). Median follow-up was 28.6 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 30.5 months). Atezolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.71 to 1.10]; P = .28). Median PFS was 11.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 12.1 months) with atezolizumab versus 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 11.2 months) with standard therapy. Subgroup analyses generally showed consistent results, including analyses by PD-L1 status. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45% (95% CI, 39 to 52) with atezolizumab and 43% (95% CI, 36 to 49) with standard therapy. The safety profile was as expected from previous experience of these drugs. CONCLUSION Combining atezolizumab with CT and maintenance niraparib for late-relapsing recurrent ovarian cancer did not significantly improve PFS or the ORR.

Pooled Safety Analysis of Single-Agent Lurbinectedin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours

Lurbinectedin was approved by FDA and other health regulatory agencies for treating adults with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Safety profile at approved dose (3.2 mg/m Data were pooled from 554 patients: 335 from all nine tumour-specific cohorts of the phase II basket trial and 219 from a randomised phase III trial (CORAIL) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Events and laboratory abnormalities were graded using NCI-CTCAE v.4. Most common tumours were ovarian (n = 219, 40%), SCLC (n = 105, 19%) and endometrial (n = 73, 13%). Transient haematological laboratory abnormalities were the most frequent grade 3 or more events: neutropenia (41%), leukopenia (30%), anaemia (17%) and thrombocytopenia (10%). Most common treatment-emergent non-haematological events (any grade) were transient transaminase increases (alanine aminotransferase [66%], aspartate aminotransferase [53%]), fatigue (63%), nausea (57%), constipation (32%), vomiting (30%) and decreased appetite (25%). Dose reductions were mostly due to haematological toxicities, but most patients (79%) remained on full lurbinectedin dose. Serious events mostly consisted of haematological disorders. Eighteen treatment discontinuations (3%) and seven deaths (1%) were due to treatment-related events. This analysis confirms a manageable safety profile for lurbinectedin in patients with advanced solid tumours. Findings are consistent with those reported in patients with relapsed SCLC, Ewing sarcoma, germline BRCA1/2 metastatic breast cancer, neuroendocrine tumours and ovarian cancer.

Primary Analysis of EPIK-O/ENGOT-ov61: Alpelisib Plus Olaparib Versus Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or Platinum-Refractory High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Without BRCA Mutation

PURPOSE Patients with platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) without a BRCA mutation have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We report efficacy and biomarker data from EPIK-O, which investigated alpelisib + olaparib versus single-agent chemotherapy in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS EPIK-O was an open-label, phase III trial that randomly assigned patients with platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory HGSOC with no germline or known somatic BRCA mutation 1:1 to alpelisib 200 mg once daily + olaparib 200 mg twice daily or treatment of physician's choice (TPC; paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 once weekly or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40-50 mg/m 2 once every 28 days). Patients had 1-3 previous systemic therapies. Previous bevacizumab was required (unless contraindicated); previous poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors were allowed. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 (blinded independent review committee [BIRC]). Secondary efficacy end points included overall response rate (ORR; per BIRC), duration of response (per BIRC), and overall survival (OS; key secondary end point). RESULTS A total of 358 patients (alpelisib + olaparib [n = 180], TPC [n = 178]) were included. The median follow-up time was 9.3 months. At data cutoff (April 21, 2023), 33 (18.3%) and 30 (16.9%) patients remained on treatment with alpelisib + olaparib and TPC, respectively. The median PFS (BIRC) was 3.6 versus 3.9 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.48]; one-sided P = .84) for alpelisib + olaparib versus TPC. The ORR was 15.6% (95% CI, 10.6% to 21.7%) versus 13.5% (95% CI, 8.8% to 19.4%). The median OS was 10.0 versus 10.6 months (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.71). The safety profile of alpelisib + olaparib was consistent with that observed for the individual agents. CONCLUSION The primary objective, PFS improvement, was not met in EPIK-O. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed. Biomarker analyses provided new insights for responders to alpelisib + olaparib.

Randomized study evaluating optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of E7386 plus lenvatinib versus treatment of physician’s choice in advanced/recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors

Randomized controlled trial data for patients with endometrial cancer who experience disease progression after anti-programmed cell death [ligand] 1 (PD-[L]1) therapy are lacking. E7386, a novel small-molecule inhibitor, has been shown to enhance anti-angiogenesis when combined with lenvatinib. The escalation and expansion parts of Study 102 showed preliminary anti-tumor activity and manageable safety of E7386 plus lenvatinib in patients with advanced, un-resectable, or recurrent endometrial cancer previously treated with anti-PD-(L)1. This study aimed to determine the optimal dose of E7386 in combination with lenvatinib. E7386 plus lenvatinib will show a manageable safety profile and clinically meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced, un-resectable, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma previously treated with chemotherapy and anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Study 102 is an open-label, global, phase 1b/2 trial. Patients with endometrial carcinoma will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to E7386 120 mg twice daily plus lenvatinib 14 mg once daily, E7386 60 mg twice daily plus lenvatinib 14 mg once daily, lenvatinib 24 mg once daily monotherapy, or treatment of physician's choice (doxorubicin 60 mg/m Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1 and must have advanced, un-resectable, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma that has progressed on/after prior platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-(L)1-directed therapy. Up to 3 previous lines of therapy are permitted. Individuals with prior treatment with lenvatinib or E7386 or known intolerance and/or known hypersensitivity to E7386, lenvatinib, doxorubicin, or paclitaxel, or any of their excipients, are not eligible to participate. The primary end points are safety and the objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by investigator assessment at week 24. The study aims to include 120 patients across approximately 80 investigational sites in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions. Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Enrollment is expected to take approximately 9 months, with presentation of results in 2026. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04008797.

Spatial Profiling of Ovarian Carcinoma and Tumor Microenvironment Evolution under Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Abstract Purpose: This study investigates changes in CD8+ cells, CD8+/Foxp3 ratio, HLA I expression, and immune coregulator density at diagnosis and upon neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), correlating changes with clinical outcomes. Experimental Design: Multiplexed immune profiling and cell clustering analysis were performed on paired matched ovarian cancer samples to characterize the immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) at diagnosis and under NACT in patients enrolled in the CHIVA trial (NCT01583322). Results: Several immune cell (IC) subsets and immune coregulators were quantified pre/post-NACT. At diagnosis, patients with higher CD8+ T cells and HLA I+-enriched tumors were associated with a better outcome. The CD8+/Foxp3+ ratio increased significantly post-NACT in favor of increased immune surveillance, and the influx of CD8+ T cells predicted better outcomes. Clustering analysis stratified pre-NACT tumors into four subsets: high Binf, enriched in B clusters; high Tinf and low Tinf, according to their CD8+ density; and desert clusters. At baseline, these clusters were not correlated with patient outcomes. Under NACT, tumors were segregated into three clusters: high BinfTinf, low Tinf, and desert. The high BinfTinf, more diverse in IC composition encompassing T, B, and NK cells, correlated with improved survival. PDL1 was rarely expressed, whereas TIM3, LAG3, and IDO1 were more prevalent. Conclusions: Several iTMEs exist during tumor evolution, and the NACT impact on iTME is heterogeneous. Clustering analysis of patients unravels several IC subsets within ovarian cancer and can guide future personalized approaches. Targeting different checkpoints such as TIM3, LAG3, and IDO1, more prevalent than PDL1, could more effectively harness antitumor immunity in this anti-PDL1–resistant malignancy.

ESR1 Mutation in Endocrine Treatment-Naïve Endometrial Cancer: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Prognostic Implications, Results from the UTOLA Phase II GINECO Trial

Abstract Purpose: Aromatase inhibitors (AI) are used to treat estrogen receptor (ER)–positive low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer. In breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are rare at diagnosis (&amp;lt;5%) but are frequently acquired in AI-resistant cases and are considered one of the major resistance mechanisms to endocrine therapy. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of ESR1 mutations in hormonotherapy-naïve endometrial cancer samples and correlate them with molecular profiles, ER expression, and clinical outcomes. Experimental Design: A total of 147 patients with advanced endometrial cancer who had responded to first-line chemotherapy were recruited into the UTOLA trial. Archival endometrial cancer tumor tissues underwent sequencing of 127 genes, including ESR1. Only hotspot mutations in the ligand-binding domain were evaluated. ESR1 mutation prevalence was validated in the Genomics England dataset. In UTOLA, tumors were classified as POLE, MMR deficient, TP53abn, or no specific molecular profiles (NSMP) based on the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (PROMISE) classification. Results: Of 147 patients, 137 had sufficient tumor material for sequencing. ESR1 mutations were identified in eight tumors (6%), including Y537S/C/N (n = 4), L536H/P (n = 2), and E380Q (n = 2). A similar prevalence (3.5%) was found among 1,311 tumors in the Genomics England dataset. All ESR1 mutation cases were low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, ER-positive, and PR-positive, and classified as NSMP. Among patients with metastatic NSMP low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, 22% (8/37) harbored ESR1 mutations. Survival outcomes after platinum chemotherapy were similar between patients with ESR1 mutation endometrial cancer and ESR1 wild type (median, not reached vs. 25.3 months; P = 0.114). Conclusions: ESR1 mutations, while rare overall in treatment-naïve endometrial cancer, are more prevalent in patients with NSMP low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, potentially affecting AI efficacy. ESR1 status should be considered in selecting hormonotherapy and as a stratification factor in AI trials.

ctDNA for Prognostication and Monitoring in Patients with Metastatic Endometrial Carcinoma Treated with Olaparib: Validation in the GINECO-UTOLA Trial

Abstract Purpose: ctDNA may offer a noninvasive means to evaluate tumor response and anticipate disease dynamics before radiologic changes in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Experimental Design: This ancillary analysis included patients from the multicenter, randomized, phase II GINECO-UTerin OLAparib (UTOLA) trial (NCT03745950) evaluating olaparib/placebo as maintenance after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Plasma samples were collected at screening after chemotherapy (baseline), 3 months (M3), and progression. ctDNA detection was assessed by a validated methylation-based Droplet Digital PCR (MethddPCR) assay targeting DNA positions universally methylated in endometrial carcinoma. Results: Among 130 evaluable patients, ctDNA was detected in 25 of 129 (19%, 1 technical fail) at baseline, 15 of 80 (19%) at M3, and 33 of 52 (63%) at progression. Baseline ctDNA positivity was independently associated with poorer progression-free survival (PFS) [median 1.81 vs. 7.39 months; adjusted HR = 5.33 (3.17–8.97)] and overall survival (OS) [10.3 vs. 24.7 months; adjusted HR = 3.98 (2.28–6.91); adjusted for age, stage IV at diagnosis, p53abn subgroup, and residual measurable lesions after chemotherapy]. Patients with baseline ctDNA had median OS of 9.36 months under olaparib versus 19.6 months under placebo (log-rank P = 0.05). Patients with increasing ctDNA at M3 had median PFS of 1.67 months, versus 9.64 months without, and median OS of 18.8 versus 25.8 months. ctDNA rising was predictive of poor postprogression OS under olaparib but not under placebo (interaction test, P &amp;lt; 0.001). Conclusions: MethddPCR-ctDNA is an independent prognostic biomarker for OS in advanced/metastatic endometrial carcinoma. MethddPCR-ctDNA may identify patients unlikely to benefit from PARP inhibition, guide therapeutic decisions, and should be further evaluated as a new stratification parameter in future endometrial carcinoma trials.

Platinum-based Chemotherapy With Atezolizumab and Niraparib in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Atezolizumab in this study is expected to have a positive benefit-risk profile for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer. Of interest, atezolizumab is being investigated also in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in second line (2L)/ third line (3L) platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients in ATALANTE (NCT02891824), which also includes bevacizumab in the combination. The study is proceeding as expected after \>100 patients enrolled and under independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) supervision. Platinum-containing therapy is considered the treatment of choice for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse. However the duration of response and the prolongation of the progression free interval with chemotherapy are usually brief, among other because these chemotherapy regimens cannot be continued until progression as they are associated with neurological, renal and hematological toxicity and cannot generally be tolerated for more than about 6 to 9 cycles. Niraparib received FDA approval in March 2017 as maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has also approved niraparib as maintenance monotherapy. Despite the progress brought about by niraparib, there is a need for a more effective treatment to extend the progression free interval in this patient population. The combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-death protein 1 (anti-PD1) or anti-death protein ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) has a compelling rationale to this aim, especially under the light of the emerging clinical data of this combination. The use of atezolizumab concurrent to platinum-containing chemotherapy followed by niraparib as maintenance therapy after completion of chemotherapy, as per normal clinical practice, may provide further benefit to patients in terms of prolonging the progression free interval and increasing the interval between lines of chemotherapy, hence delaying further hospitalization and the cumulative toxicities associated with chemotherapy. Additionally, preliminary studies with atezolizumab suggest an acceptable tolerability profile for long term clinical use in recurrent ovarian cancer patients and other indications.

Olaparib Maintenance Monotherapy in Patients With BRCA Mutated Ovarian Cancer Following First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy.

Olaparib Monotherapy in Patients with BRCA Mutated Ovarian Cancer following First Line Platinum Based Chemotherapy.

Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, paclitaxel, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving chemotherapy and radiation therapy after surgery may kill any tumor cells that remain after surgery. It is not yet known whether giving chemotherapy together with radiation therapy is more effective than giving radiation therapy alone in treating endometrial cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying chemotherapy and radiation therapy to see how well they work compared with radiation therapy alone in treating patients with high-risk, stage I, stage II, or stage III endometrial cancer.