Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for                     Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q: How does OCRA curate its research paper database?

OCRA indexes peer-reviewed papers from PubMed and CrossRef, enriched with MeSH terms, author profiles, and citation metrics. Papers are categorized by cancer type, research method, and clinical relevance.

Q: Can I search papers by MeSH term or author?

Yes. Use the search bar to filter papers by MeSH term, author name, journal, keyword, or cancer type. Each paper includes linked MeSH terms and author profiles for further exploration.

Q: How current is the paper database?

The database is updated regularly through automated ingestion from PubMed and CrossRef. Most papers appear within days of their PubMed indexing date.

Kichang Han; Man-Deuk Kim; Joon Ho Kwon; Gyoung Min Kim; Sungmo Moon; Juil Park; Turki Mohammed A. Dhahi; Jinho Yang; Hye Jung Shin

doi:10.1148/radiol.231525

Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kichang Han & Hye Jung Shin et al.

When used for uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids, resorbable microspheres showed no evidence of a difference from trisacryl gelatin microspheres in terms of therapeutic effectiveness or postprocedural pain scores.

Resorbable Microspheres versus Trisacryl Gelatin Microspheres for Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Links

Journal

Institutions

Authors

Funding