Clinician Characteristics Associated With Adoption of Updated National Colposcopy Guidelines

Naomi C. Brownstein & Rebecca B. Perkins et al. · 2025-02-14

1Citations

Objective

To evaluate adherence to the 2019 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines for management of patients following colpscopic cervical biopsy among US colposcopists.

Methods

To elucidate factors associated with utilization of the 2019 guidelines for patients undergoing colposcopic cervical biopsy, the authors cross-sectionally surveyed physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform colposcopy. Clinicians responded to clinical vignettes describing scenarios for which management recommendations differed between 2019 and prior management guidelines. Vignette 1 involved deferral of repeat colposcopy for patients with a low-risk biopsy, HPV, and cytology results. Vignette 2 involved deferral of excisional treatment on a patient with repeated low-grade biopsy results. Binomial logistic regression models determined factors associated with utilization of 2019 guidelines.

Results

A total of 670 colposcopists participated from across the United States. For Vignettes 1 and 2, guideline-adherent responses were given by 30.5% and 66.1% of participants, respectively. Colpsocopists practicing in community health centers were more likely to perform guideline-concordant care for Vignettes 1 and 2. Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic colposcopists and Internal or Family medicine compared to OB-GYN colposcopists are less likely to perform guideline-concordant care in Vignette 2. Irrespective of their chosen response, most believed they were guideline-adherent.

Conclusions

Many colposcopists may not realize their current management strategies are inconsistent with 2019 guidelines. Tailored education initiatives could address knowledge gaps, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.

TL;DR

Many colposcopists may not realize their current management strategies are inconsistent with 2019 guidelines, and tailored education initiatives could address knowledge gaps, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms.

AI-generated by Semantic Scholar