Objective. This study evaluated generative adversarial network (GAN)-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) standardization methods by comparing them with conventional preprocessing and a posteriori approaches from the literature in their ability to mitigate the influence of acquisition parameters on radiomic analyses. Approach. MR T2-weighted images (T2w) of 30 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) were acquired prospectively (cohort 1). For each patient, three images were taken sequentially on the same scanner with different values of repetition time (TR) and voxel size (VS). A retrospective cohort of 160 LACC patients (cohort 2) was also collected, including 86 and 160 T2w MR images taken before radiation therapy and brachytherapy, respectively. A conditional GAN (cGAN) and a cycleGAN were trained on cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively, to generate images robust to the impact of acquisition parameters. This generative network-based standardization approach was compared to histogram-matching standardization, z-score standardization, and the ComBat harmonization methods. In this aim, different image quality metrics were extracted from cohort 1 images and the impact of standardization methods was assessed using principal component analysis (PCA). Using intra-class correlation (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), robust features were characterized (CCC&ICC