The Lancet Infectious Diseases

A blueprint for elimination of cervical cancer

Biosimilar second-generation human papillomavirus vaccines

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-produced Human Papillomavirus (16 and 18) L1 virus-like-particle vaccine: end-of-study analysis of a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

This Escherichia coli-produced bivalent HPV 16 and 18 vaccine was well tolerated and effective against HPV 16 and 18 associated high-grade genital lesions and persistent infection in interim analysis of this phase 3 trial. We now report data on long-term efficacy and safety after 66 months of follow-up. This phase 3, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial was done in five study sites in China. Eligible participants were women aged 18-45 years, with intact cervix and 1-4 lifetime sexual partners. Women who were pregnant or breastfeeding, had chronic disease or immunodeficiency, or had HPV vaccination history were excluded. Women were stratified by age (18-26 and 27-45 years) and randomly (1:1) allocated by software (block randomisation with 12 codes to a block) to receive three doses of the E coli-produced HPV 16 and 18 vaccine or hepatitis E vaccine (control) and followed-up for 66 months. The primary outcomes were high-grade genital lesions and persistent infection (longer than 6 months) associated with HPV 16 or 18 in the per-protocol susceptible population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01735006. Between Nov 22, 2012, and April 1, 2013, 8827 women were assessed for eligibility. 1455 women were excluded, and 7372 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the HPV vaccine (n=3689) or control (n=3683). Vaccine efficacy was 100·0% (95% CI 67·2-100·0) against high-grade genital lesions (0 [0%] of 3310 participants in the vaccine group and 13 [0·4%] of 3302 participants in the control group) and 97·3% (89·9-99·7) against persistent infection (2 [0·1%] of 3262 participants in the vaccine group and 73 [2·2%] of 3271 participants in the control group) in the per-protocol population. Serious adverse events occurred at a similar rate between vaccine (267 [7·2%] of 3691 participants) and control groups (290 [7·9%] of 3681); none were considered related to vaccination. The E coli-produced HPV 16 and 18 vaccine was well tolerated and highly efficacious against HPV 16 and 18 associated high-grade genital lesions and persistent infection and would supplement the global HPV vaccine availability and accessibility for cervical cancer prevention. National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key R&D Program of China, Fujian Provincial Project, Fundamental Funds for the Central Universities, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, and Xiamen Innovax.

Immunogenicity and safety of an Escherichia coli-produced bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (Cecolin) in girls aged 9–14 years in Ghana and Bangladesh: a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines have been available for nearly 20 years. However, the overall coverage of girls aged 15 years and younger is low, especially in low-resource settings, where the burden of cervical cancer is highest. Increasing access and facilitating implementation of HPV vaccination will contribute to cervical cancer elimination efforts. To generate data in different dosing regimens and in low-resource settings, we aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of various schedules of an Escherichia coli-expressed bivalent HPV vaccine (2vHPV) compared with a widely used quadrivalent vaccine. This randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial enrolled healthy girls aged 9-14 years from single sites in Ghana and Bangladesh. Participants were randomly assigned via interactive web response system technology equally into five study groups, stratified by site: two doses of 2vHPV, the first at baseline and the second 6, 12, or 24 months later; a quadrivalent HPV vaccine (4vHPV) at baseline followed 24 months later by 2vHPV; or two doses of 4vHPV given 6 months apart (referent). We tested for antigen-specific (HPV-16 and HPV-18) binding antibodies by ELISA at baseline and before and 1 month after the second dose. The primary objective was to show immunological non-inferiority of the 2vHPV vaccine schedules to the referent 1 month after the second dose in the per-protocol population, with a non-inferiority margin of 0·5 for the lower bound of the 98·3% CI for the geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratio. Adverse events and serious adverse events were evaluated as secondary endpoints in the total vaccinated population. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04508309) and is completed. Between March 15 and Nov 18, 2021, 1025 girls were enrolled and received 2vHPV at baseline and 6 months (n=205), 12 months (n=206), or 24 months (n=204); 4vHPV at baseline and 6 months (n=205); or 4vHPV at baseline and 2vHPV at 24 months (n=205). 96-99% of participants across groups were included in the per-protocol analysis. 1 month after the second dose, 2vHPV non-inferiority was shown, with GMC ratios between 1·1 and 2·4 (lower bound of the 98·3% CI of the GMC ratio between 0·9 and 1·9) for HPV-16, and between 1·3 and 1·7 (1·0 and 1·4) for HPV-18. As an exploratory objective, we assessed 2vHPV immunogenicity after one dose, finding that it was similar to that of 4vHPV up to 24 months, with GMC ratios at 24 months of 1·1 (95% CI 0·9-1·4) for HPV-16 and 1·4 (1·1-1·7) for HPV-18. The frequency of adverse events was similar across study groups, with no related unsolicited events reported. Serious adverse events were rare and none were determined to be related to vaccination. Non-inferior immune responses for extended two-dose regimens of 2vHPV support dosing flexibility. For up to 24 months, one dose of 2vHPV elicited immunogenicity that was similar to one dose of 4vHPV, for which single-dose efficacy has been shown, supporting a single-dose use of 2vHPV. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and immunological testing was funded in part by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. For the Bengali translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Optimal human papillomavirus vaccination strategies to prevent cervical cancer in low-income and middle-income countries in the context of limited resources: a mathematical modelling analysis

Introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been slow in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) because of resource constraints and worldwide shortage of vaccine supplies. To help inform WHO recommendations, we modelled various HPV vaccination strategies to examine the optimal use of limited vaccine supplies and best allocation of scarce resources in LMICs in the context of the WHO global call to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem. In this mathematical modelling analysis, we developed HPV-ADVISE LMIC, a transmission-dynamic model of HPV infection and diseases calibrated to four LMICs: India, Vietnam, Uganda, and Nigeria. For different vaccination strategies that encompassed use of a nine-valent vaccine (or a two-valent or four-valent vaccine assuming high cross-protection), we estimated three outcomes: reduction in the age-standardised rate of cervical cancer, number of doses needed to prevent one case of cervical cancer (NNV; as a measure of efficiency), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; in 2017 international $ per disability-adjusted life-year [DALY] averted). We examined different vaccination strategies by varying the ages of routine HPV vaccination and number of age cohorts vaccinated, the population targeted, and the number of doses used. In our base case, we assumed 100% lifetime protection against HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-31, HPV-33, HPV-45, HPV-52, and HPV-58; vaccination coverage of 80%; and a time horizon of 100 years. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, we used a 3% discount rate. Elimination of cervical cancer was defined as an age-standardised incidence of less than four cases per 100 000 woman-years. We predicted that HPV vaccination could lead to cervical cancer elimination in Vietnam, India, and Nigeria, but not in Uganda. Compared with no vaccination, strategies that involved vaccinating girls aged 9-14 years with two doses were predicted to be the most efficient and cost-effective in all four LMICs. NNV ranged from 78 to 381 and ICER ranged from $28 per DALY averted to $1406 per DALY averted depending on the country. The most efficient and cost-effective strategies were routine vaccination of girls aged 14 years, with or without a later switch to routine vaccination of girls aged 9 years, and routine vaccination of girls aged 9 years with a 5-year extended interval between doses and a catch-up programme at age 14 years. Vaccinating boys (aged 9-14 years) or women aged 18 years or older resulted in substantially higher NNVs and ICERs. We identified two strategies that could maximise efforts to prevent cervical cancer in LMICs given constraints on vaccine supplies and costs and that would allow a maximum of LMICs to introduce HPV vaccination. World Health Organization, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, Compute Canada, PATH, and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Elimination of cervical cancer depends on HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening