Journal

The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care

Papers (10)

Sequential treatment with relugolix combination therapy in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids that were inadequately managed with 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system: the first report

This is the first report aimed to evaluate the clinical impact and safety of sequential treatment with relugolix combination therapy (relugolix CT) in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids that were inadequately managed with 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) monotherapy. The patients included four women aged 45-52 (mean: 48) years with symptomatic uterine fibroids, sometimes with coexisting adenomyosis, and bleeding persistence despite treatment with the LNG-IUS (52 mg) contraceptive for more than 6 months. The intervention included the combined use of LNG-IUS (52 mg) and relugolix CT (relugolix 40 mg + oestradiol 1 mg + norethisterone acetate 0.5 mg daily). All women (100%) reported complete resolution of bleeding and improved quality of life following the initiation of relugolix CT while maintaining LNG-IUS (52 mg) in place as a contraceptive. No adverse events were observed. The mean followup was 11.2 (range 3-24) months, and satisfaction with the combined treatment was reported as 9.4/10. The sequential combination of the contraceptive LNG-IUS (52 mg) and relugolix CT may offer a safe, well tolerated, and effective non-surgical alternative for the management of symptomatic uterine fibroids, particularly in women who do not completely respond to a 6-month treatment with LNG-IUS (52 mg). These findings support further prospective investigation into this dual therapeutic sequential strategy for symptomatic uterine fibroids.

Awareness of the non-contraceptive benefits of reversible contraceptive methods in a cohort of Brazilian women: an exploratory study

We assess the awareness of Brazilian women about non-contraceptive benefits of contraceptives and compare non-health with health care providers. We conducted a survey in Brazil using a questionnaire administered via Google Forms asking women to respond about the awareness of non-contraceptive benefits of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), etonogestrel (ENG)-implant, copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD), and male condom. We received 2,068 completed questionnaires, 720 women (34.8%) aged ≤ 29 years and 236 (11.4%) were physicians or nurses. Only one third of the respondents were aware that COC use is associated with decreased risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers; 296 (16.1%) about that the use of DMPA is associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer, and 253 (13.8%) were aware about that the users of the Cu-IUD present lower risk of cervical cancer. We identified significant differences between non-health care providers when compared to physicians or nurses. We found low awareness regarding the associated lower risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer associated with the use of some contraceptives, evidencing the need to provide more information about the non-contraceptive benefits during training for health care providers.

Post-reproductive aged women: a lost generation in the cervical cancer screening programme

The aims of the study were to find out why some post-reproductive aged women did not participate in the organised cervical cancer screening programme in Latvia and to clarify factors that would motivate them to take part. A cross-sectional study was carried out between January and July 2017 among female patients in three general practitioner (GP) practices. GP practice nurses used the Latvian national health service database to identify women aged 25-70 who had not participated in the organised programme for the last 3 years. Participants were asked to complete a specially developed questionnaire. The results were then compared between three age groups: 25-34, 35-49 and 50-70 years. Included in the study were 523 out of 992 women who had not attended screening; 41% were in the age group 50-70 years. Post-reproductive aged women statistically significantly more often did not take part in the programme because of lack of time (26.4%), too great a distance to the gynaecology screening clinic (10.4%), lengthy appointment waiting time (8.5%) and a belief that a smear test was unnecessary for them (8.5%); 32.1% of women in this age group indicated that if the cervical screen could be carried out by their GP it would facilitate their participation in the programme. Post-reproductive aged women in Latvia often do not attend cervical cancer screening. Analysis of personal and organisational barriers confirmed that the involvement of GPs would encourage older women to participate in the organised screening programme.

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

ISSN

1362-5187

The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care