Journal

Pathologica

Papers (24)

In-house testing for homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) testing in ovarian carcinoma: a feasibility study comparing AmoyDx HRD Focus panel with Myriad myChoiceCDx assay

Homologous recombination repair (HRR) is the main mechanism of repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Its deficiency (HRD) is a common feature of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). BRCA1/2 mutations and/or other aberrations in genes of HRR are well known causes of HRD and genomic instability. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the management of BRCA mutant EOCs and demonstrated activity in HRD tumor cells. Determining HRD status can provide informations on the magnitude of benefit for PARPi therapy. Myriad MyChoice CDx is a next generation sequencing- based in vitro diagnostic test that assesses the Genomic Instability Score (GIS) which is an algorithmic measurement of loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, and large-scale state transitions using DNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor tissue specimens. However Myriad MyChoice CDx, is a centrally performed and costly assay, with no reimbursement scheduled, at least in Italy. In this report, we described our experience in performing the HRD Focus AmoyDx (Amoy Diagnostics Ltd, Xiamen, Fujian, China) on the same samples of EOCs evaluated with Myriad MyChoiceCDx assay. The overall percent agreement between AmoyDx and Myriad was 87.8% (65 of 74 tumors tested). All the 36 AmoyDx negative cases were confirmed to be negative by Myriad (negative predictive value, 100%). The concordance of the results with the gold standard Myriad MyChoice CDx assay suggest the feasibility and reliability of HRD testing in diagnostic laboratories with high-throughput NGS platforms and qualified personnel.

Biomarker characterization in endometrial cancer in Europe: first survey data analysis from 69 pathological academic and hospital labs

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the commonest gynecological cancer affecting women in Western populations. To predict patient risk, the 2020 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Female Genital Tract stressed the importance of integrated histo-molecular classification of the disease. This survey analysis poses attention on the most frequently used immunohistochemical and molecular markers adopted in daily categorization of ECs in European laboratories. We analyzed data collected through questionnaires administered to 40 Italian, 20 Spanish, 3 Swiss and 6 United Kingdom (UK) laboratories. We collected information regarding daily practice in EC evaluation, specifically concerning mismatch repair status (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Summary and descriptive statistical analyses were carried out to evaluate the current practice of each laboratory. The results show that MMR status is mainly evaluated by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) on most EC samples. The most frequent approach for the analysis of MMR status is IHC of four proteins (PMS2, MSH6, MSH2, MLH1). MSI analysis by molecular methods is uncommon but useful as a supplemental tool in specific conditions. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and BRAF V600 mutations analysis are performed in case of negative expression of MLH1/PMS2. Other markers (mainly p53 followed by POLE and PTEN) are investigated in particular in Spain and Switzerland in a consistent number of cases. Guidelines consultation and standardization of laboratory procedures are efficient means for EC prognostic risk stratification and improving the quality of care.

Biomarker characterization in endometrial cancer in Italy: first survey data analysis

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common gynecological malignant disease in high income countries. The 2020 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Female Genital Tract underlines the important clinical implications of the new integrated histo-molecular classification system, in order to correctly define the specific prognostic risk group. This survey analysis will focus on the most commonly adopted immunohistochemical and molecular biomarkers used in daily clinical characterization of a diagnosed endometrial carcinoma in Italian labs. An evaluation questionnaire was distributed to 41 Italian pathology laboratories. Normal habits in EC evaluation, especially regarding mismatch repair status (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI), were collected. A summary and a descriptive statistical analysis were used to show the current practice of each laboratory. The analysis of MMR status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is carried out on the majority of all EC samples. The most frequent strategy for the analysis of MMR status in EC is IHC of four proteins (PMS2, MSH6, MSH2, MLH1). MSI analysis by molecular method in endometrial cancer is rarer and more restricted to some circumstances. Hypermethylation of the Adoption of guidelines and standardization of pre-analytical and analytical procedures are effective tools for adequate EC prognostic risk stratification and high quality standard of care.

The utility of evaluating mismatch repair proteins in endometrial carcinoma: an experience from a tertiary referral centre in North India

Endometrial cancer (EC) is a common gynecological malignancy. Around 25-30% patients have mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations in MMR genes. Lynch-associated tumours have better prognosis, however implications for prognosis and survival is less known. Microsatellite insufficiency (MSI) is associated with high neoantigen loads and number of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, which overexpresses PD-1 and PD-L1 and are excellent candidates for PD-1-targeted immunotherapies. In this study, we aim to evaluate the utility of MMR in patients with EC and its clinico-pathological correlation. Eighty-two cases of EC which underwent MMR evaluation over a period of five years at our centre were included. Demographics, clinical details including family history, histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) parameters were recorded. Tumors with loss-of at least one protein were considered MMR deficient (MMRd) and those with intact expression were MMR proficient (MMRp). Of 82 cases tested, 27 (33%) were MMRd. Frequencies of IHC MMR loss of expression were: MLH1/PMS2: 17 (21%), MSH6 loss only: 3 (4%), MSH2/MSH6 loss: 3 (4%), PMS2 loss: 2 (2%). In MMRd cases, most common histologic tumor type was endometrioid adenocarcinoma (70%). Loss of expression was significantly (p < 0.001) more frequent in lower uterine segment involvement and positive family history. MSI plays an important role in the progression of endometrial cancer. Lower uterine segment involvement and positive family history are significant predictor of MMR loss. Routine testing of MMR proteins in endometrial cancer can contribute to screening of Lynch syndrome families and make immunotherapy available as a treatment option.

High FOXA1 immunohistochemical expression level associates with mucinous histology, favorable clinico-pathological prognostic parameters and survival advantage in epithelial ovarian cancer

Forkhead box (FOX) A1 is a potential therapeutic biomarker that has been investigated in various human cancers. Limited data exist about FOXA1 biologic role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This study assessed FOXA1 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression and evaluated its association with clinico-pathological parameters in EOC including overall and disease-free survivals (OS, DFS) and patient's outcome. Patient's socio-epidemiologic, clinical, radiological, laboratory, surgical, and follow-up data were collected. After histopathologic typing, grading and staging, FOXA1 IHC expression was scored in 98 EOC specimens. Clinico-pathological associations were investigated in high-and low-FOXA1 expression groups using appropriate statistical methods. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. FOXA1 tumor cell nuclear staining was detected in 63.3% of EOC with weak, moderate and strong scores (28.6%, 12.2% and 22.5% respectively). Comparing high- and low-expression groups (34.7% and 65.3% respectively), high FOXA1 was associated with larger tumors, low mean serum CA-125, tumor histopathology (mucinous and low-grade serous), type I EOC, limited tumor's anatomical extent, absence of nodal or distant metastases and omental nodules, earlier FIGO stages, non-recurrent tumors and survival advantage with longer and OS and DFS (all p ≤ 0.05). Independent predictors of high FOXA1 expression included: omental nodules, tumor's anatomical extent and tumor's size (p ≤ 0.001, = 0.046 and = 0.023 respectively). FOXA1 is frequently expressed in EOC notably mucinous and low-grade serous carcinomas in association with favorable prognostic clinico-pathological parameters and longer OS and DFS. It likely has a suppressor function in EOC and could be recommended as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker.

Low-grade endometrial endometrioid carcinoma of the p53-abnormal group: case presentation and diagnostic issues

P53-abnormal endometrial carcinomas are high-grade and aggressive tumors which should be treated with chemo-/radiotherapy. In low-grade endometrioid carcinoma (LGEC), abnormal expression of p53 is an exceptional finding and is typically accompanied by patchy p16 positivity and diffuse hormone receptor expression. Herein, we report a case of LGEC exhibiting both p53 and p16 overexpression, highlighting the diagnostic pitfalls related to such phenotype. A 60-year-old woman underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy due to a deeply myoinvasive endometrial mass. The tumor showed glandular architecture, low-grade nuclei and glandular differentiation. Focal lymphovascular space invasion and no lymph node metastases were observed. Immunohistochemically, the tumor showed p53 overexpression, p16 block-type positivity, diffuse hormone receptors positivity and retained mismatch repair proteins expression. No POLE mutations were identified. A diagnosis of p53-abnormal LGEC was eventually made. A glandular neoplasm with p53 and/or p16-overexpression on endometrial biopsy specimens may raise the concern of other entities such as serous carcinoma, HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma, and gastric-type adenocarcinoma. An immunohistochemical panel including hormone receptors, p53, p16 and mismatch repair proteins appears necessary for an accurate diagnosis of uterine adenocarcinomas.

Publisher

Siapec Servizi Srl

ISSN

1591-951X