Journal

Lymphatic Research and Biology

Papers (5)

Factors Influencing Lower Limb Lymphedema After Cervical Cancer Surgery: A Case–Control Study

Background: To analyze the factors influencing lower limb lymphedema (LLL) after cervical cancer surgery and provide a scientific reference for its effective prevention and control. Methods and Results: Patients at a tertiary tumor hospital between January 2010 and January 2020 who received surgical treatment for cervical cancer were included in this study. Patients were divided into lymphedema case group ( n  = 253) and control group ( n  = 506) according to lymphedema occurrence, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the factors influencing the occurrence of LLL after cervical cancer surgery. Multifactor conditional logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors for lymphedema occurrence included body mass index, level of education, the presence of preoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, radiotherapy within 3 months after postoperative chemoradiotherapy, emergence of coronary heart disease within 3 months, vaginal disease, occurrence of postoperative complications, cervical cancer diagnosis before the manifestation of menstrual abnormalities, and a history of previous surgery. Conclusion: Postoperative LLL after cervical cancer surgery is a chronic progressive disease, and no cure for LLL has been identified. Thus, determining the risk factors associated with LLL occurrence after uterine and cervical cancer surgery and the development of targeted prevention and early intervention strategies is urgently needed.

Treatment and Impact of Cervical-Cancer-Related Lymphatic Disorders on Quality of Life and Sexuality Compared with Controls

Background: Lymphatic disorders are frequent complications related to treatment for cervical cancer (CC). The aims of the study are to evaluate the impact of lymphatic disorders on quality of life (QOL) and sexuality in CC survivors after the completion of oncological treatment and to compare them with controls. Methods and Results: An ambispective cohort study was performed by using the Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Cervix (Cx) fourth version, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Twelve patients affected by lymphatic disorders comprised the study group, 251 comprised the CC control group, and 185 comprised the non-CC control group. Regarding QOL, there were no statistically significant differences between the lymphatic disorder-unaffected and non-CC control groups, except in the WHOQOL-BREF environment domain. A weak positive correlation between lymphatic disorder and FACT-Cx additional concerns (σ = 0.135) was observed. Regarding sexuality, a weak negative correlation was detected between lymphatic disorders and FSFI sexual satisfaction (σ = −0.200) and a weak positive correlation was observed between lymphatic disorders and FSFI dyspareunia (σ = 0.148). We did not observe statistically significant differences in QOL satisfaction between the lymphatic disorder-affected and non-CC control groups. Symptomatic controls reported significantly higher physical health scores than the lymphatic disorder-affected group ( p  < 0.05). Regarding the psychological domain, the asymptomatic controls obtained significantly higher scores than the lymphatic disorder-affected group ( p  = 0.003). Conclusions: Lymphatic disorders notably influenced the QOL of CC survivors compared with the non-CC control groups. Lymphatic disorders had a significant negative impact on physical and psychological health. Sexuality was scarcely affected by lymphatic disorders.

Association Between Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Lower-Limb Lymphedema Markers in Patients with Lymphedema Secondary to Gynecological Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Lower-limb lymphedema (LLL) secondary to gynecological cancer is a serious health condition that negatively affects physical activity (PA). We investigated the association between objectively measured PA and lymphedema markers in patients with LLL after gynecological cancer treatment. Methods and Results: This cross-sectional study included 56 patients (mean age: 62.0 years) with LLL attending a lymphedema center. The degree of lymphedema was evaluated based on lower-limb water content (extracellular water content/whole body water content: ECW/TBW). The amount and intensity of PA were measured using an accelerometer. Thirty-three patients (61.1%) with ECW/TBW ≥0.4 were older, had significantly more sedentary time, and spent lesser time on moderate-to-vigorous activity than patients with ECW/TBW <0.4 ( p < 0.05). A generalized linear model using the rate of change in ECW/TBW showed an association with older age, longer time since cancer diagnosis, and lower activity level. The severity of subjective symptoms measured using a visual analog scale did not differ between patients with high and low ECW/TBW. Conclusions: Patients with LLL spent approximately half of the time in sedentary behavior, with more severe cases exhibiting longer sedentary durations. In older patients who have a long-standing cancer diagnosis, medical professionals should evaluate their activity and self-care status in addition to evaluating LLL and use this information to provide individualized interventions.

Far Infrared Radiation Therapy for Gynecological Cancer-Related Lymphedema Is an Effective and Oncologically Safe Treatment: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

Background: Gynecological cancer-related lymphedema (GCRL) is a devastating condition that adversely influences function, health, and quality of life. We conducted a randomized-controlled clinical study as well as in vitro experiments to investigate the efficacy and safety of far infrared radiation (FIR) to treat lymphedema in patients having previously undergone surgery for gynecological tumors. Materials and Methods: Seventy-four women with GCRL, cancer free for 5 years or more, were randomly allocated into two treatment groups: standard of care with bandage treatment and treatment with FIR plus bandage. Variations of fluid, circumference of lymphedematous limbs, serum tumor markers (cancer antigen 125 [CA125]), inguinal-pelvic lymph nodes, vagina, lungs, and adverse reactions were assessed after 1 year. In vitro experiments examined the effects on cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and the cell cycle of fibroblast, A2780, SKOV-3, HELA, and Ishikawa cells. Results: The FIR+bandage group showed significantly decreased tissue fluid and reduced limb circumference ( p  < 0.05) in comparison with the control group at 1 year. There was no increase of serum CA125 in both groups, and no recurrence of neoplasia or lymphadenopathy was detected. No adverse reactions were recorded. In addition, no changes were detected after FIR treatment for fibroblast, A2780, SKOV-3, HELA, and Ishikawa cells in cell viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and cell cycle. Conclusion: FIR can be used to treat patients with GCRL following gynecological cancer treatment. Following clinical and experimental studies, we confirm that FIR is an oncologically safe treatment for lymphedema in gynecological tumor patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

ISSN

1539-6851

Lymphatic Research and Biology