Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Hormonal Therapy in Pretreated Patients With Recurrent Ovary Granulosa Cell Tumor

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of hormonal therapy (HT) in patients with recurrent adult ovary granulosa cell tumors. Methods: The clinical and treatments features of the patients who received HT were studied retrospectively. The efficacy and safety of HT were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier technique was used to conduct survival analysis. Results: The research involved a total of thirteen patients. The median age of the participants was 49 years (range: 34-61). Since diagnosis, the median number of surgeries has been three (range: 2-8). At least one chemotherapy regimen has been administered to 12 (92.3%) patients. Ten of the patients (76.9%) had at least two metastatic areas. Lung metastases were found in two (15.4%) of the patients. Inhibin B levels were elevated in 81.2% of patients before hormone treatment. The patients received different HTs (Leuprolide acetate + anastrozole-three patients, leuprolide acetate + tamoxifen-six patients, only anastrozole-three patients, only tamoxifen-one patients). The median progression-free survival was found 17.7 months (95 % CI: 14.7-20.6). In four (33.4%) patients, an overall response (complete or partial) was identified. A stable response was observed in eight (66.7%) patients. Conclusions: HT is effective in pretreated individuals with recurrent ovarian granulosa cell tumors, according to this research. Despite the limited number of patients and treatment variability, disease control was achieved in all patients. Also, we found that Inhibin B levels were associated with treatment response.

A Real World Perspective of PARP Inhibitor Use in Gynecological Cancer Patients

Introduction: Over the last few years, targeted therapy has become the mainstay maintenance treatment of patients with ovarian cancer including patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. Poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are effective in the treatment of patients who are in complete or partial remission. PARPi are known to cause hematological adverse events (AEs), but have not been compared directly to each other. Objective: Primary objective was to compare the incidence of hematological and non-hematological AEs associated with the use of PARPi. Methods: This was a single institution, retrospective study evaluating patients who were treated with PARPi for ovarian cancer from January 2017 to October 2020. Patients were stratified according to which PARP inhibitor they received. Results: Ninety-two patients were included in final analysis. Thirty-one (33.7%) patients received niraparib and 61 (66.3%) patients received olaparib. Median age of patients were 64.3 (range, 33.8 to 92.3) years, 66 (71.7%) were white, and 84 (91.3%) had an ECOG PS of 0/1. Patients in the niraparib group experienced a higher rate of hematologic AEs, with 11 (35.5%), 20 (64.5%), and 18 (58.1%) experiencing neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Eight (13.1%), 24 (39.3%), and 16 (26.2%) patients in the olaparib group experienced neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Conclusion: This single institution retrospective study outlines the hematological toxicities observed between two PARPi. Our results suggested that niraparib tended to be associated with a higher risk for hematologic toxicities than olaparib. Anemia was the most common hematologic toxicity which was consistent with what has been widely documented in the literature.