Journal

Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer

Papers (10)

Survival Outcomes in Stage IV Gastric Cancer Patients with Krukenberg Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Stage IV gastric cancer patients with Krukenberg tumors typically exhibit poor survival outcomes, often less than 2 years. The management of this tumor subgroup remains non-standardized, and the impact of oophorectomy on survival remains uncertain. In this study, we systematically analyzed survival outcomes among gastric cancer patients with ovarian metastases who underwent standard chemotherapy, surgical resection of ovarian metastases, or combined chemotherapy and surgery. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies retrieved from MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library until January 25, 2024, applying the Boolean logic. Participants included individuals with pathologically and radiologically confirmed ovarian metastasis or clinically symptomatic cases with imaging evidence. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v.4.3.2., Vienna). The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID-CRD42023488373). A total of 1502 patients from 17 retrospective studies were pooled for analysis of overall survival (OS) outcomes. The OS in the standard chemotherapy cohort, as determined by the random effects model, was 6.708 months (95% CI 3.867 to 9.548; P<0.0001), with non-significant heterogeneity (I This meta-analysis offers key insights into survival outcomes associated with different therapeutic modalities in gastric cancer with Krukenberg metastases. It provides valuable evidence for clinical decision-making and future research directions. While the combined approach of chemotherapy and surgery demonstrates the highest effect size for OS, careful consideration of patient-centric approaches is essential in the oncological care landscape.

An Evaluation of the Fecal Microbiome in Lynch Syndrome

There is limited data regarding the fecal microbiome findings in patients with Lynch syndrome. We aimed to study the fecal micobiome of patients with Lynch syndrome with and without cancer. We performed an observational study comparing the fecal microbiome of patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) with cancer with those without cancer. We included subjects older than 18 years with LS and excluded those with a history of colectomy or inflammatory bowel disease. We analyzed their fecal microbiome by 16S ribosomal subunit PCR amplification and performed comparative analyses. Eight patients were included: 3 of these with LS and cancer (LS-C) and 5 patients with LS and no cancer (LS-NC). We found non-significant differences at the phyla and genera level between the LS-C and LS-NC groups. At the phyla level, LS-C patients had a higher percentage of Bacteroidetes (42.2% vs. 28.5%; P = 0.068) and Verrucomicrobia (0.644% vs 0.0007%; P = 0.10), and a lower percentage of Firmicutes (48.3% vs. 65.4%; P = 0.078). At the genus level, LS-C patients had a higher rate of Akkermania (0.766% vs. 0.001%; P = 0.11). LS-C patients with endometrial cancer had a higher rate of Bacteroides (37.4% vs 17.3%; P = 0.10). LS-C patients had a lower rate of Pseudobutyrvibrio (0.74% vs. 2.71%; P = 0.10). The fecal microbiome of LS patients with extraintestinal cancer differs that of LS patients without cancer. Further studies are needed to explore microbiome changes in these high risk patients.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

ISSN

1941-6628