Journal

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Papers (7)

Physical, Emotional, and Stress-Related Dynamics over Six Months in Newly Diagnosed Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Survivors

Background and Objectives: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains the deadliest gynecologic malignancy, yet the psychosocial dynamics of early survivorship are inadequately described. We prospectively quantified six-month trajectories in the quality of life in a consecutive cohort of 88 women newly diagnosed with EOC and explored clinical moderators of change. Methods: Eighty-eight consecutive patients (mean age 59.1 ± 10.7 years) completed the SF-36, WHOQOL-BREF, EORTC QLQ-C30, and 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) at baseline (pre-therapy) and six months after cytoreductive surgery ± platinum-based chemotherapy. Stage (FIGO I–II vs. III–IV) and treatment pathway (primary debulking surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus interval debulking, chemotherapy only) data were recorded. Results: Global QoL improved significantly (EORTC Global Health +5.9 ± 7.7 points; p < 0.001) while perceived stress declined (ΔPSS −3.6 ± 5.1; p < 0.001). SF-36 Physical Functioning rose 4.7 ± 7.9 points (p < 0.001) and Mental Health 4.4 ± 7.9 points (p = 0.004). The WHOQOL Physical and Psychological domains gained 4.7 ± 7.1 and 4.3 ± 7.4 points, respectively (both p < 0.01). Advanced-stage patients experienced larger stress reductions than early-stage patients (−4.1 ± 2.7 vs. −2.9 ± 2.2; p = 0.028) but comparable QoL gains. Greater stress relief correlated with greater mental-health improvement (r = −0.51) and global-health gains (r = −0.45) (all p < 0.001). Treatment pathway did not significantly influence trajectories. Conclusions: Early survivorship after first-line ovarian-cancer therapy was characterized by the clinically meaningful recovery of physical and emotional functioning together with the moderate alleviation of perceived stress. Improvements were observed irrespective of stage and treatment strategy, suggesting that contemporary multimodal regimens do not inevitably compromise patient-reported outcomes. Our estimates provide preliminary effect sizes that should be validated in multi-center cohorts with longer follow-up.

Clinical Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Outcomes of Borderline Ovarian Tumours: A Retrospective Observational Study from North East London

Background: Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) are a unique subset of epithelial ovarian neoplasms characterised by atypical epithelial proliferation without stromal invasion. BOTs are typically diagnosed at an early stage, primarily affect women of reproductive age, and have a favourable prognosis. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes of BOTs in a North East London cohort. Methods: A retrospective, multicentric analysis was conducted on 69 patients with histologically confirmed BOTs managed between January 2018 and December 2022 across the Barts Health NHS Trust hospitals. Clinical and demographic data, surgical details, histopathological findings, and recurrence rates were analysed. We used descriptive and exploratory statistical methods. Results: The mean age at diagnosis was 44 years, with 46.37% under 40, including 18 nulliparous women. Most tumours (91.3%) were FIGO stage I, with mucinous histology predominating (56.52%), followed by serous BOTs (27.53%). Ultrasound and MRI demonstrated 65.45% and 81.5% sensitivities for borderline or malignant features, respectively. Surgical approaches included open surgery (75.4%), laparoscopy (17.4%), and robotic-assisted procedures (2.9%). Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) was performed in all nulliparous women under 40 years of age. Recurrence occurred in 2 cases, both in patients with prior FSS performed over a decade earlier. Conclusions: FSS is a viable option for young women, especially if nulliparous and under the age of 40, with recurrence rates comparable to radical procedures. Most patients were diagnosed early (FIGO I) with excellent prognoses. MRI proved most sensitive for diagnosis, while long-term follow-up with transvaginal ultrasound and CA-125 monitoring is crucial for detecting recurrences.

Ovarian Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Challenges and Future Perspectives

Background: Ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (O-NENs) are extremely rare, representing less than 1% of all ovarian neoplasms and under 5% of all neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). They encompass two primary histological subtypes: well-differentiated carcinoids and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, which display distinct biological behaviors and prognoses. The ovary can also be a site of metastasis from extra-ovarian NETs. Owing to their rarity, clinical management lacks standardization, and diagnosis is often incidental following surgery for presumed epithelial ovarian neoplasms. Objectives: This review aims to provide an updated synthesis of current evidence on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment strategies, and prognosis of O-NENs, highlighting unmet clinical needs. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed for the years 2014–2024 using the keywords: “ovarian neuroendocrine tumor”, “ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasm”, “ovarian neuroendocrine carcinoma”, and “ovarian carcinoid”. Only articles published in English were considered. Given the rarity of the disease, in addition to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, relevant case reports and case series were also included to provide a comprehensive clinical picture, yielding 32 eligible articles. Results: Evidence indicates that O-NENs remain understudied, with most data derived from case reports and small series. Clinical presentations vary from asymptomatic masses to hormone-related syndromes, often mimicking other ovarian pathologies. Diagnostic work-up typically follows the same protocol as epithelial ovarian cancer, with the neuroendocrine nature only recognized postoperatively. Treatment strategies are empirical and largely extrapolated from extra-ovarian NETs due to the absence of specific guidelines. Prognosis varies widely depending on histotype, stage, and secretory activity. Conclusions: O-NENs pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their rarity and heterogeneity. Greater clinical awareness, multidisciplinary management, and multicenter research are essential to establish evidence-based protocols and improve patient outcomes.

Primary Ovarian Poorly Differentiated Adenocarcinoma with Signet-Ring Cells: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background: Primary ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma (POSRCC) is exceedingly rare. Most previously reported cases have involved primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms containing signet-ring cells. Methods: We report a unique case of advanced primary ovarian adenocarcinoma with a signet-ring cell component, accompanied by features inconsistent with typical mucinous morphology, which distinguished it from most previously documented cases. A review of the literature is also provided. Results: A 57-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain. Imaging revealed a 10 cm pelvic mass. Surgical exploration and pathological examination revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with focal signet-ring cell features in both ovaries. Extensive preoperative and postoperative evaluation revealed no evidence of an alternative primary tumor. The tumor did not meet diagnostic criteria for mucinous carcinoma. Therefore, the final diagnosis was primary ovarian poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with a focal signet-ring cell component, FIGO stage IIIC. The patient received six cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin, followed by four cycles of single-agent bevacizumab for maintenance therapy. Despite treatment, disease recurred eight months after surgery, and the patient died of disease progression 18 months postoperatively. Conclusions: This case highlights the aggressive behavior of non-mucinous POSRCC and underscores the diagnostic challenge in distinguishing primary from metastatic ovarian signet-ring cell carcinoma. Awareness of this rare entity is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management.

A Proposed Model of a Pragmatic Surgical Approach in Women Affected by Uterine Fibroids Undergoing IVF: A “Real Practice” Experience

Background/Objectives: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign neoplasms of the female genital tract, with a prevalence of 20% to 40% among women of reproductive age. Their management in the context of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) represents a major clinical challenge, characterized by controversies, contrasting approaches, and a lack of shared guidelines. Indeed, the detrimental effects of fibroid treatments are not well known and may be influenced by the size, location, and number of fibroids. The impact of hysteroscopic myomectomy in women affected by submucosal myomas (FIGO classification type: G0–G2) is well documented in the current literature; however, the impact of intramural and subserosal myoma removal (FIGO types 3–8), in particular those <4/5 cm in diameter, remains controversial. The aim of the present study is to introduce and share a pragmatic surgical approach to uterine fibroid management prior to In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), to reduce the knowledge gap regarding uterine fibroid treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observationally study that included 94 cases of infertile women, who underwent myomectomy at our IVF centre at Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy, between 2020 and 2025. These patients met the inclusion criterion of having an idiopathic/tubal factor of infertility and were aged < 40. We evaluated a group of 17 women (group A) who underwent hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal fibroids (FIGO types 0–2) and a group of 39 women (group B) who underwent open (laparotomic) myomectomy for intramural/subserosal fibroids (FIGO types 3–8). Group B was compared with a control group of 38 women who were similar in terms of all demographic and clinical parameters and myoma features (group C) and did not want to undergo a myomectomy procedure. All surgical procedures were executed by the same expert surgeon following our proposed model: submucosal fibroids were always removed by operative hysteroscopy, while intramural/subserosal fibroids were removed if there were three or more and if they were at least 1 ≥ 3 cm in size. All enrolled patients subsequently underwent IVF treatment at our centre, which consisted of an antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, and all transferred embryos were of good quality according to the recent European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) classification. Results: In group A, we observed an implantation rate of 41% and a clinical pregnancy rate of 35.2%, and these results are consistent with the current literature. In group B, we obtained statistically significant differences in the implantation (31% vs. 12.9%) and pregnancy rates (28.1% vs. 7.8%) compared to group C (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). In addition, the live birth rate was statistically higher compared to that in group C (p < 0.01). Miscarriage and preterm delivery rates were lower in group B, although the differences were not statistically significant. No severe post-surgical complications, such as uterine rupture, were observed during subsequent pregnancies. Conclusions: Despite the limited patient sample size, the monocentric experience, and the retrospective design, we emphasize the effectiveness of our proposed surgical model in women affected by myomas. Indeed, the surgical treatment of submucosal, intramural, and subserosal lesions may improve ART and pregnancy outcomes (through a higher implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and live birth rate, as well as a lower miscarriage/preterm rate).

Publisher

MDPI AG

ISSN

2077-0383