Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Dyadic coping mediates the effects of attachment on quality of life among couples facing ovarian cancer

Cancer is an interpersonal stressor affecting both patient and spouse. To examine the pathways that insecure adult attachment can impact health outcomes by way of dyadic processes, this cross-sectional study used the actor-partner interdependence mediation model to examine whether common dyadic coping (CDC) mediated the associations between attachment and quality of life (QOL). Couples (N = 106) facing ovarian cancer were recruited from a comprehensive cancer center and completed self-report questionnaires. Results indicated that worse social and functional QOL were associated with both one's own and one's partner's greater insecure attachment, by way of one's own use of less CDC. Unexpectedly, greater CDC reported by one's partner was associated with one's own lower functional QOL. Although CDC has beneficial effects on QOL, CDC may also be experienced as draining. Effects of adult attachment on dyadic coping are a significant contributor to subjective health outcomes among couples facing ovarian cancer.

Death anxiety predicts fear of Cancer recurrence and progression in ovarian Cancer patients over and above other cognitive factors

AbstractDeath anxiety is understudied in people with cancer, especially in relation to fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and fear of progression (FOP). The present study aimed to identify if death anxiety can predict FCR and FOP over and above other known theoretical predictors. One hundred and seventy-six participants with ovarian cancer were recruited for an online survey. We included theoretical variables, such as metacognitions, intrusive thoughts about cancer, perceived risk of recurrence or progression, and threat appraisal, in regression analyses to predict FCR or FOP. We investigated whether death anxiety added to the variance over and above these variables. Correlational analyses demonstrated that death anxiety is more strongly associated with FOP than FCR. The hierarchical regression including the theoretical variables described above predicted 62–66% of variance in FCR and FOP. In both models, death anxiety predicted a small but statistically significant unique variance in FCR and FOP. These findings draw attention to the importance of death anxiety in understanding FCR and FOP in people with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. They also suggest that elements of exposure and existentialist therapies may be relevant in treating FCR and FOP.

Factors associated with HPV vaccination decision-making among Korean American women

Despite a significant reduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the United States in the past decade, Korean American (KA) women experience a disproportionately high cervical cancer burden due to low HPV vaccination rates. Given associations between parental decision-making and adolescent vaccination, it is crucial to identify and address factors influencing parental HPV vaccination decision-making for their children. The purpose of this study was to examine the sociodemographic characteristics and health literacy factors in relation to KA women's willingness to allow their daughters to receive HPV vaccination. We used baseline data collected from 560 KA women who participated in a cluster-randomized trial designed to promote mammography and Pap test screening. Participants answered study questionnaires measuring individual characteristics, cancer literacy, HPV knowledge, and HPV vaccination decision-making for their daughters. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the correlates of HPV vaccination decision-making among participants. Over half of the participants (54%) endorsed HPV vaccination for their daughters. Low knowledge, compared to high and medium HPV knowledge (aOR 3.48, CI 2.01-6.04 and aOR 2.14, CI 1.46-3.12, respectively), were significantly associated with higher odds of participants' intention to vaccinate their daughters. Additionally, in comparison to low cancer literacy, middle-range cancer literacy (aOR 1.70, CI 1.08-2.68) was significantly associated with higher odds of participants' intention to vaccinate their daughters. Misperceptions about cancer and low HPV knowledge among KA women should be considered when providing vaccine counseling and developing interventions to promote cervical health in this population.