Journal

Human Reproduction

Papers (19)

Turner syndrome: fertility, familial clustering, and cancer risk

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is there an increased risk of reproductive or colon cancer in women with Turner syndrome and their family members? SUMMARY ANSWER Our data suggest that there is an increased risk for sigmoid colon cancer in women with Turner syndrome and an increased prostate cancer risk in second- and third-degree male relatives. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Turner syndrome has been associated with lower risk of breast cancer, but increased risk of gonadoblastoma and colon cancer in some, but not all studies. There is also evidence for a genetic predisposition to sex chromosome aneuploidy, which may indicate a predisposition to Turner syndrome and the associated cancer risk in family members. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was a retrospective case–control study of women with Turner syndrome diagnosed from 1995 to 2021, their relatives, and population subjects from Utah. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women with Turner syndrome were identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes in electronic medical records from two major Utah healthcare systems and reviewed for accuracy. Women with Turner syndrome were linked to genealogy in the Utah Population Database. Cancer diagnoses (breast, ovarian, endometrial, colon, testicular, and prostate) were determined for women with Turner syndrome and their relatives using the Utah Cancer Registry. Live births to women with Turner syndrome were identified by linked birth certificates. The relative risk of cancer in women with Turner syndrome and in relatives was estimated by comparison to population rates matched by age, sex, and birthplace. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We identified 289 women with Turner syndrome. Sigmoid colon cancer was increased in women with Turner syndrome (OR [95% CI] 24.2 [2.9, 87.4]; P = 0.0032). There were 233 women with Turner syndrome who had at least three generations of genealogical data. There was an increased risk of Turner syndrome in first- (OR [95% CI] 18.08 [2.19, 65.32]; P = 0.0057) and second-degree relatives (9.62 [1.17, 34.74]; P = 0.019), although numbers were very small. There was an increased risk of prostate cancer in second- (1.8 [1.4, 2.2]; P < 0.001) and third-degree relatives (1.3 [1.1, 1.5]; P < 0.001). There was no increased risk of colon cancer in relatives. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Based on the small number of sigmoid colon cancer cases, it is possible that our data have overestimated the colon cancer risk. Limitations include the identification of Turner syndrome by a diagnosis code in one of the two major health systems in Utah. The population is largely northern European with 9.3% of the women self-identified as Hispanic and 2.4% as Native American or multiple races. The results may not be generalizable to other populations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our data suggest that women with Turner syndrome may need early screening for colon cancer. Additional studies are needed to identify risk factors for sex chromosome aneuploidy and cancer risk in women with Turner syndrome and their male relatives. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The work in this publication was supported by R56HD090159 and R01HD099487 (C.K.W.). We also acknowledge partial support for the Utah Population Database through grant P30 CA2014 from the National Cancer Institute. The Utah Cancer Registry is funded by the National Cancer Institute’s SEER Program, Contract No. HHSN261201800016I, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Program of Cancer Registries, Cooperative Agreement No. NU58DP007131, with additional support from the University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Genomic alterations in ovarian endometriosis and subsequently diagnosed ovarian carcinoma

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Can the alleged association between ovarian endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma be substantiated by genetic analysis of endometriosis diagnosed prior to the onset of the carcinoma? SUMMARY ANSWER The data suggest that ovarian carcinoma does not originate from ovarian endometriosis with a cancer-like genetic profile; however, a common precursor is probable. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Endometriosis has been implicated as a precursor of ovarian carcinoma based on epidemiologic studies and the discovery of common driver mutations in synchronous disease at the time of surgery. Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma and clear cell ovarian carcinoma are the most common endometriosis-associated ovarian carcinomas (EAOCs). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The pathology biobanks of two university hospitals in Sweden were scrutinized to identify women with surgically removed endometrioma who subsequently developed ovarian carcinoma (1998–2016). Only 45 archival cases with EAOC and previous endometriosis were identified and after a careful pathology review, 25 cases were excluded due to reclassification into non-EAOC (n = 9) or because ovarian endometriosis could not be confirmed (n = 16). Further cases were excluded due to insufficient endometriosis tissue or poor DNA quality in either the endometriosis, carcinoma, or normal tissue (n = 9). Finally 11 cases had satisfactory DNA from all three locations and were eligible for further analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Epithelial cells were collected from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections by laser capture microdissection (endometrioma n = 11) or macrodissection (carcinoma n = 11) and DNA was extracted. Normal tissue from FFPE sections (n = 5) or blood samples collected at cancer diagnosis (n = 6) were used as the germline controls for each included patient. Whole-exome sequencing was performed (n = 33 samples). Somatic variants (single-nucleotide variants, indels, and copy number alterations) were characterized, and mutational signatures and kataegis were assessed. Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair status were confirmed with PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The median age for endometriosis surgery was 42 years, and 54 years for the subsequent ovarian carcinoma diagnosis. The median time between the endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma was 10 (7–30) years. The data showed that all paired samples harbored one or more shared somatic mutations. Non-silent mutations in cancer-associated genes were frequent in endometriosis; however, the same mutations were never observed in subsequent carcinomas. The degree of clonal dominance, demonstrated by variant allele frequency, showed a positive correlation with the time to cancer diagnosis (Spearman’s rho 0.853, P < 0.001). Mutations in genes associated with immune escape were the most conserved between paired samples, and regions harboring these genes were frequently affected by copy number alterations in both sample types. Mutational burdens and mutation signatures suggested faulty DNA repair mechanisms in all cases. LARGE SCALE DATA Datasets are available in the supplementary tables. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Even though we located several thousands of surgically removed endometriomas between 1998 and 2016, only 45 paired samples were identified and even fewer, 11 cases, were eligible for sequencing. The observed high level of intra- and inter-heterogeneity in both groups (endometrioma and carcinoma) argues for further studies of the alleged genetic association. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The observation of shared somatic mutations in all paired samples supports a common cellular origin for ovarian endometriosis and ovarian carcinoma. However, contradicting previous conclusions, our data suggest that cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis years prior to the carcinoma were not directly associated with the malignant transformation. Rather, a resilient ovarian endometriosis may delay tumorigenesis. Furthermore, the data indicate that genetic alterations affecting the immune response are early and significant events. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The present work has been funded by the Sjöberg Foundation (2021-01145 to K.S.; 2022-01-11:4 to A.S.), Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (965552 to K.S.; 40615 to I.H.; 965065 to A.S.), Swedish Cancer Society (21-1848 to K.S.; 21-1684 to I.H.; 22-2080 to A.S.), BioCARE—A Strategic Research Area at Lund University (I.H. and S.W.-F.), Mrs Berta Kamprad’s Cancer Foundation (FBKS-2019-28, I.H.), Cancer and Allergy Foundation (10381, I.H.), Region Västra Götaland (A.S.), Sweden’s Innovation Agency (2020-04141, A.S.), Swedish Research Council (2021-01008, A.S.), Roche in collaboration with the Swedish Society of Gynecological Oncology (S.W.-F.), Assar Gabrielsson Foundation (FB19-86, C.M.), and the Lena Wäpplings Foundation (C.M.). A.S. declares stock ownership and is also a board member in Tulebovaasta, SiMSen Diagnostics, and Iscaff Pharma. A.S. has also received travel support from EMBL, Precision Medicine Forum, SLAS, and bioMCC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Added value of buccal cell FISH analysis in the diagnosis and management of Turner syndrome

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is there an added diagnosis value of buccal cell FISH analysis compared with blood lymphocyte chromosomal investigations in patients with Turner syndrome (TS)? SUMMARY ANSWER Buccal cell FISH analysis, a non-invasive technique, modified the chromosomal results obtained with the blood karyotype in 17 patients (12%) of our cohort. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Few studies have evaluated buccal cell FISH analysis and compared them with blood karyotype in patients with TS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A prospective, monocentric cohort study was conducted in a rare diseases centre (CMERC) between July 2017 and August 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In total, 142 adult patients with TS, and at least 5% 45,X cells in a previous blood karyotype, were recruited. All the patients’ files were included in the CEMARA database. This national database has been declared to the French data protection agency (CNIL approval number 1187326). In compliance with French law, consent regarding non-opposition to collect and use the data was obtained from each patient. A FISH analysis on a buccal smear was performed. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The percentage of 45,X cells was identical between the two tissues in only 32.4% of cases. The discrepancy was higher than 41% for 12% of the cohort. The percentage of 45,X cells was higher in blood in 53 (37.3%) patients, and higher in buccal cells in 43 (30.3%) of cases. In 17 (12%) cases, the blood karyotype had to be reconsidered in regard to the buccal cell analysis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION It would have been interesting to evaluate karyotypes in cells from other tissues such as cells from skin biopsy or from the urinary tract and even from blood vessels or gonads in case of surgery and to compare them with each patient’s phenotype. However, most of the time, these tissues are not available. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Although blood lymphocyte karyotype remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of TS, buccal cell FISH analysis is an efficient tool to evaluate the global chromosomal constitution in these patients, thus allowing them to have better care and follow-up. For instance, identifying a Y chromosome can prevent the occurrence of a gonadoblastoma, as gonadectomy should be discussed. On the other hand, finding normal XX cells in a patient with a previous diagnosis of homogenous 45,X TS, may be psychologically helpful and relevant for gynaecological care. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No specific funding was sought for the study. The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A

Syndecan-1 modulates the invasive potential of endometrioma via TGF-β signalling in a subgroup of women with endometriosis

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the physiological role of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β1) and syndecans (SDC1, SDC4) in endometriotic cells in women with endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER We observed an abnormal, pro-invasive phenotype in a subgroup of samples with ovarian endometriosis, which was reversed by combining gene silencing of SDC1 with the TGF-β1 treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Women with endometriosis express high levels of TGF-β1 and the proteoglycan co-receptors SDC1 and SDC4 within endometriotic cysts. However, how SDC1 and SDC4 expression is regulated by TGF-β1 and the physiological significance of the high expression in endometriotic cysts remains unknown as does the potential role in disease severity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We utilized a pre-validated panel of stem- and cancer cell-associated markers on endometriotic tissue (n = 15) to stratify subgroups of women with endometriosis. Furthermore, CD90+CD73+CD105+ (SC+) endometriotic stromal cells from these patient subgroups were explored for their invasive behaviour in vitro by transient gene inhibition of SDC1 or SDC4, both in the presence or absence of TGF-β1 treatment. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Endometriotic cyst biopsies (n = 15) were obtained from women diagnosed with ovarian endometriosis (ASRM Stage III–IV). Gene expression variability was assessed on tissue samples by applying gene clustering tools for the dataset generated from the pre-validated panel of markers. Three-dimensional (3D) spheroids from endometriotic SC+ were treated in vitro with increasing doses of TGF-β1 or the TGFBRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 and assessed for SDC1, SDC4 expression and in vitro 3D-spheroid invasion. Transcriptomic signatures from the invaded 3D spheroids were evaluated upon combining transient gene silencing of SDC1 or SDC4, both in presence or absence of TGF-β1 treatment. Furthermore, nanoscale changes on the surface of endometriotic cells were analysed after treatment with TGF-β1 or TGFBRI/II inhibitor using atomic force microscopy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Gene clustering analysis revealed that endometriotic tissues displayed variability in their gene expression patterns; a small subgroup of samples (2/15, Endo-hi) exhibited high levels of SDC1, SDC4 and molecules involved in TGF-β signalling (TGF-β1, ESR1, CTNNB1, SNAI1, BMI1). The remaining endometriotic samples (Endo-lo) showed a uniform, low gene expression profile. Three-dimensional spheroids derived from Endo-hi SC+ but not Endo-lo SC+ samples showed an aberrant expression of SDC1 and exhibited enhanced 3D-spheroid invasion in vitro, upon rhTGF-β1 treatment. However, this abnormal, pro-invasive response of Endo-hi SC+ was reversed upon gene silencing of SDC1 with the TGF-β1 treatment. Interestingly, transcriptomic signatures of 3D spheroids silenced for SDC1 and consecutively treated with TGF-β1, showed a down-regulation of cancer-associated pathways such as WNT and GPCR signalling. LARGE SCALE DATA Transcriptomic data were deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and could be retrieved using GEO series accession number: GSE135122. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION It is estimated that about 2.5% of endometriosis patients have a potential risk for developing ovarian cancer later in life. It is possible that the pro-oncogenic molecular changes observed in this cohort of endometriotic samples may not correlate with clinical occurrence of ovarian cancer later in life, thus a validation will be required. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study emphasizes the importance of interactions between syndecans and TGF-β1 in the pathophysiology of endometriosis. We believe that this knowledge could be important in order to better understand endometriosis-associated complications such as ovarian cancer or infertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by Cancerfonden (CAN 2016/696), Radiumhemmets Forskningsfonder (Project no. 154143 and 184033), EU MSCA-RISE-2015 project MOMENDO (691058), Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (IUT34-16), Enterprise Estonia (EU48695) and Karolinska Institute. Authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Oncofertility outcomes after fertility-sparing treatment of bilateral serous borderline ovarian tumors: results of a large retrospective study

Abstract Study question What are the oncofertility outcomes of young women (≤40 years old) with bilateral serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) after fertility-sparing surgery? Summary answer Fertility preservation with the bilateral ovarian cystectomy procedure is feasible for bilateral SBOTs, with an acceptable oncological outcome and worthwhile pregnancy rates. What is known already Fertility-sparing approaches are becoming the standard management of young patients with unilateral SBOTs and other borderline histological subtypes. However, there is a paucity of evidence to dictate the best management in bilateral SBOTs. Study design, size, duration This was a retrospective observational study performed at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital in Beijing, China, between January 1999 and January 2019. Participants/materials, setting, methods Ninety-four women (≤40 years old) with pathologically confirmed bilateral SBOTs were included. Following preoperative counseling, patients self-selected into one of three treatment modalities: bilateral ovarian cystectomy (n = 48), unilateral adnexectomy plus contralateral cystectomy (UAC; n = 31), and radical surgery (n = 15). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the clinical and pathological features associated with disease-free survival and reproductive outcomes. Main results and the role of chance During the median follow-up of 64 months (range, 4–243 months), 61 patients (65%) developed relapse, including 3 (20%) in the radical group, 26 (84%) in the UAC group and 32 (67%) in the bilateral cystectomy group. In the multivariate analyses, preoperative CA-125>300 U/mL, fertility preservation and micropapillary pattern were independently associated with adverse disease-free survival (P = 0.001, 0.03 and 0.026, respectively). Fourteen patients (15%) experienced invasive recurrence, and three (3%) died of progressive disease. The micropapillary pattern was significantly associated with invasive evolution risk (P = 0.006). Of the 49 patients who attempted to conceive, 23 (47%) achieved 27 pregnancies (24 spontaneous and three after IVF-ET), resulting in 19 live births. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.13) or pregnancy rate (41 vs. 50%, P = 0.56) between the UAC and bilateral procedures. Limitations, reasons for caution As a retrospective study conducted in a referral center, inherent biases exist. The nonrandom allocation to treatment groups and relatively small number of patients attempt to conceive might limit the statistical power of our findings. Only 41 patients (43.6%) received complete staging during their initial surgeries, so an underestimation bias in terms of the FIGO stage and extraovarian implants might have occurred. Wider implications of the findings The ultraconservative bilateral ovarian cystectomy procedure should be proposed in bilateral SBOTs when technically feasible. Invasive evolution occurs frequently in these women, and intense follow-up and oncofertility counseling are warranted, especially for those with micropapillary patterns. Study funding/competing interest(s) No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. Trial registration number N/A.

Ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx: results of the OCASE nationwide population-based database study

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the effect of salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx at a young age on ovarian cancer risk compared to no salpingectomy for any reason? SUMMARY ANSWER We found no significant reduction in ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Salpingectomy may reduce ovarian cancer incidence, although the lag-time between intervention and therapeutic effect remains to be elucidated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This nationwide population-based database study uses the Dutch pathology database to identify all women who underwent salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx between January 1990 and December 2012 and compared ovarian cancer incidence to a control group of women who had a benign dermal nevus removed, matched for age at the time and year of procedure. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS After selection and manual control of intervention and control group, ovarian cancer incidence was recorded. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI for the development of ovarian cancer were calculated with Cox regression analyses, both unadjusted and adjusted for age. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate lag-time between intervention and protective effect. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In all, 18 961 women were included in the intervention group; 17 106 women had a unilateral salpingectomy and 1855 had a bilateral salpingectomy. The control group consisted of 23 686 women. With 14 ovarian cancer cases in the intervention group, the incidence rate (IR) of ovarian cancer was 5.4 (95% CI 3.1–8.9) per 100 000 person-years. In the control group, there were 24 ovarian cancer cases, resulting in an IR of 7.1 (95% CI 4.7–10.5) per 100 000 person-years (P = 0.34). The age-adjusted HR for ovarian cancer was 0.76 (95% CI 0.39–1.47) after salpingectomy. Unilateral salpingectomy resulted in an age-adjusted HR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.41–1.59) and bilateral salpingectomy resulted in an age-adjusted HR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.06–3.16) based on one case. None of our subgroup analysis for lag-time resulted in a significant difference in ovarian cancer incidence between intervention and control group. The difference in ovarian cancer incidence appeared largest in women with at least 8 years of follow-up (P = 0.08). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Due to the young population, ovarian cancer incidence is low, even at the end of follow-up. Furthermore, due to the anonymous nature of the pathology registry, we were unable to adjust for confounding factors. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Although results did not reach statistical significance, they add to the available data on ovarian cancer incidence after salpingectomy. Our subgroup analysis suggests there may be no benefit in the first years following salpingectomy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Long-term risk of endometrial cancer after assisted reproductive technology

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the risk of endometrial cancer after long-term follow-up in women treated with ART between 1983 and 2001 compared with women in the general population and subfertile women who did not undergo ART? SUMMARY ANSWER The risk of endometrial cancer is not increased in women who underwent ART in the Netherlands between 1983 and 2001, neither compared with women from the general population nor compared with subfertile women not treated with ART. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Concerns have been raised that subfertility treatment may be associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer. However, published studies show inconsistent results regarding the effects of ovarian stimulation and specific subfertility diagnoses on endometrial cancer risk. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A nationwide historic cohort study (the OMEGA-cohort) was conducted to examine the risk of cancer in women after ovarian stimulation for ART. The OMEGA-cohort comprises 30 625 women who received ovarian stimulation for ART (ART group) in 1983–2000 and 9988 subfertile women not treated with ART (non-ART group). After a median follow-up of 24 years, endometrial cancer incidence was ascertained through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Endometrial cancer risk in the cohort was compared with that in the general population using person-years analyses, and between the ART group and non-ART group using multivariable Cox regression analyses. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Detailed ART-treatment data were obtained from the medical records and complete information on parity and age at first birth was obtained through linkage with the Personal Records Database. Information on hysterectomy and endometriosis was collected through linkage with the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (Palga). Data about lifestyle factors, including BMI, were obtained through a self-administered questionnaire. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE After a median follow-up duration of 24 years, 137 endometrial cancers were diagnosed. Endometrial cancer risk after ART was not significantly increased compared with that in the general population (standardized incidence ratio = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.97–1.44) nor compared with that in the non-ART group (multivariably adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.74–1.67). Risk of endometrial cancer did not increase with longer follow-up or with more ART cycles, and the risk within the cohort, did not vary by cause of subfertility (male, tubal, unexplained, and other). Irrespective of ART treatment, endometrial cancer risk was increased in obese women and women with endometriosis, but decreased among parous women and women who used oral contraceptives. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although the findings of the study are reassuring, the median age of the women at the end of follow-up (median age 56 years) was still rather young. Therefore, there is a need for at least 10–15 additional follow-up years to draw definitive conclusions. In addition, other large studies are needed to investigate the risk of endometrial cancer in women who underwent ART. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The results of this study contribute to knowledge about long-term health after ART treatment, which is valuable to subfertile couples, considering or undergoing fertility treatments, and their healthcare providers. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was supported by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (NKI 2006-3631) and a departmental grant from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (2011-019). Ma.S. is Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Open; A.W.vd.B.-D received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the Dutch Cancer Society; C.B.L. is Editor-in-Chief of Human Reproduction; A.E.P.C. is Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, received royalties from Uptodate Hyperthecosis, and participated at the Data Safety Monitoring Board of the DSMB POEM Study; F.B. has received research support from Merck, honoraria or consultation fees from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Bensis Healthcare, CooperSurgical, and participated in an advisory board for Merck and Ferring; J.L. has received research support from Ferring, Merck, and Roche Diagnostics, consulting fees and honoraria from Ferring, participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of the LOCI trial, is President of the AE-PCOS society, and Member of the ASRM Integrity Committee; J.M.J.S. has received honoraria from Ferring and Merck, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Ferring, Merck, and Good Life, and participated in the advisory board of Merck; L.L.v.L. received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Olympus Medical Expert training; M.M.v.R. received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Ferring; M.G. declares departmental research and educational grants from Ferring (location VUmc), unrelated to the presented work. The other authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Impact of definitive uterine artery occlusion on ovarian reserve markers in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does definitive occlusion of uterine arteries have a short- or long-term impact on ovarian reserve markers in reproductive-age women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy? SUMMARY ANSWER Preventive definitive uterine artery occlusion (UAO) during laparoscopic myomectomy reduces intraoperative blood loss but does not impact serum AMH levels after short- and long-term follow-up in reproductive-age women. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumours in women of reproductive age. For symptomatic women willing to retain their uterus, especially for a future pregnancy, the current gold standard is surgical myomectomy for subserous/intramural leiomyoma. Temporary or definitive occlusion of uterine arteries can be performed to control bleeding during surgery but its impact on ovarian reserve markers is still unclear. A single randomized trial with a 1-year follow-up demonstrated that temporary bilateral UAO during laparoscopic myomectomy slightly decreased AMH levels at postoperative day 2 but has no significant impact at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We conducted a randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up evaluating the effect of definitive occlusion of uterine arteries on ovarian reserve markers via sequential measures of AMH levels and AFC by ultrasound assessment. The study included 58 women with symptomatic leiomyoma type FIGO 3 to 6 scheduled for laparoscopic myomectomy between July 2015 and October 2021. Patient allocation was disclosed to the surgeon just before starting the procedure; women were blinded to group allocation throughout the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Patients were randomized in two groups: the UAO group (laparoscopic myomectomy with preventive occlusion of uterine arteries) (n = 29 women) and the no-UAO group (laparoscopic myomectomy without occlusion of uterine arteries but with intra-myometrial injection of vasoconstrictive agents) (N = 29 women). Serum AMH levels and AFC were evaluated at baseline (T0) and followed at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T6), 12 months (T12), and 24 months (T24) after surgery. Intraoperative blood loss, evolution of uterine bleeding and pain symptoms, and leiomyoma recurrence were also evaluated as secondary outcomes. Pregnancies and live births were monitored. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Women in both groups did not differ in their baseline characteristics in terms of age, body mass index, ethnicity, parity, wish to become pregnant, hormonal treatment, leiomyoma number and size, baseline haemoglobin levels, uterine bleeding symptoms, baseline serum AMH levels, and AFC. The mean operative time was similar between both groups. Mean blood loss during surgery was on average 138 (±104) ml in the UAO group versus 436 (±498) ml in controls (P < 0.001). In the UAO group, 0% had an intraoperative blood loss >500 ml versus 32.1% in the no-UAO group (P < 0.01). Regarding clinical symptoms, most patients in both groups had decreased menstrual flow at the last follow-up visit (24 months) compared to baseline and improvement of dysmenorrhea followed the same trend with a reduction in pain levels in both groups. The risk of leiomyoma recurrence was similar between both groups. Serum AMH levels did not differ between the groups at any time (T1, T3, T6, T12, and T24) and non-inferiority of preventive occlusion was demonstrated with a non-inferiority margin of [−3.5 pmol/l]. Differences between means and 95% CI (in parentheses) were as follows: at T1 −0.11 (−2.14 to 2.40), at T3 −0.25 (−2.36 to 2.21), at T6 0.81 (−2.69 to 3.84), at T12 −0.95 (−3.15 to 1.33), and at T24 1.18 (−1.95 to 3.82). AFC did not differ between the groups at any time, however, non-inferiority of preventive occlusion could not be demonstrated, presumably due to a large variability in this measurement. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our sample size was calculated to detect a clinically relevant difference of at least two-thirds of the SD in serum AMH levels, but we cannot exclude that a larger sample size might have revealed a smaller impact on serum AMH. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Preventive UAO during laparoscopic myomectomy does not compromise ovarian reserve markers and can be used safely to improve perioperative bleeding control in women of reproductive age. Incorporating UAO as a preventive measure during laparoscopic myomectomy may enhance the safety of the procedure. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Funded by the Department of Paediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Geneva University Hospitals. There are no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02563392. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 9 July 2015. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT July 2015.

Livebirth among 5940 Danish women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 18–40 years between 1968 and 2016: a register-based cohort study

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does livebirth probability differ between women diagnosed with breast cancer and unaffected women and is it impacted by age at diagnosis, time trends, parity, partnership status, and the presence of lymph node metastases and distant metastases? SUMMARY ANSWER Livebirth probability was significantly reduced in 5940 women diagnosed with breast cancer aged 18–40 years during 1968–2016 compared to 1 126 478 age-matched unaffected women, particularly among women with higher diagnosis age, parity ≥ 1, marriage, and the presence of nodal involvement and distant metastases. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The survival rate for women diagnosed with breast cancer has increased over the recent decades, and in Denmark, the 5-year survival rate for women diagnosed <50 years of age was 92.2% in 2022. Chemotherapy can damage the ovarian reserve, resulting in premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility. The age of first-time mothers is increasing, and many women have not yet completed family building at the time of diagnosis. Consequently, greater focus is now placed on quality-of-life following breast cancer, including the possibility of survivors to have children. Studies have shown a decreased fertility rate in women diagnosed with cancer during their reproductive lifespan, however, studies specifically focusing on the probability of livebirth in women previously diagnosed with breast cancer are scarce. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a national, register-based cohort study including women diagnosed with breast cancer from the Danish Cancer Register between 1968 and 2016, aged 18–40 years at time of diagnosis (n = 5940). Each woman was randomly matched with ∼190 unaffected women from the background population according to the age at diagnosis (n = 1 126 478). The women were followed in medical and sociodemographic national population registers until childbirth, death, immigration, or end of study (31 December 2018). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In all analyses, we compared the probability of livebirth between women diagnosed with breast cancer and the age-matched comparison group. Analyses were stratified by parity- and partnership status at diagnosis, age-group at diagnosis, and year of diagnosis. Stratified analyses on the probability of livebirth were conducted for women with lymph-node metastases and distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. Analyses were adjusted for age, year of diagnosis, parity, educational level, and migration status. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The study population consisted of 5940 women aged 18–40 years at diagnosis of breast cancer between 1968 and 2016 and 1 126 478 women in the age-matched comparison group. Breast cancer survivors had a significantly lower probability of livebirth than the age-matched comparison group (aHR 0.38 [95% CI 0.35–0.41]); negatively impacted by increasing age at diagnosis (35–40 years: aHR 0.34 [95% CI 0.28–0.40], 18–24 years: 0.66 [95% CI 0.46–0.95]), parity ≥1 (parous: aHR 0.31 [95% CI 0.27–0.35], nulliparous: 0.51 [95% CI 0.45–0.59]), and marriage (married: aHR 0.31 [95% CI 0.27–0.36], single 0.53 [95% CI 0.45–0.63]). Being diagnosed in recent decades increased the probability of livebirth in nulliparous women; however, the same association was not found for parous women. Among women with nodal involvement (48%) and distant metastases (3%), the probability of livebirth compared to unaffected women was aHR 0.30 [95% CI 0.26–0.35] and 0.18 [95% CI 0.08–0.42], respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION We did not have information on whether the women desired children or whether they underwent fertility preservation (FP) prior to receiving gonadotoxic treatment. For women diagnosed in the most recent decades, the follow-up time was limited. Information on tamoxifen treatment for estrogen receptor-positive tumors could have been relevant, as it likely delays pregnancy and consequently reduces conception probability. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results highlight the continued importance of onco-fertility counseling and FP in young women diagnosed with breast cancer, particularly among women diagnosed toward the end of their reproductive lifespan and those with the presence of lymph node metastases and distant metastases. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study is funded by the Independent Research Fund Denmark (Grant ID 10.46540/4308-00130B). Anja Pinborg has received grants (payment to institution) and consultancy fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, and Cryos; honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, and Organon; and support for attending meetings and/or travel (payment to institution) from Gideon Richter. These companies had no role in the study. The remaining authors have no conflicts or interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Carboplatin and paclitaxel induced-gonadotoxicity on the ovarian reserve of young breast cancer patients with BRCA1 mutation

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Are ovarian tissue fragments from patients with BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1)-mutated breast cancer (BC) more sensitive to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel exposure compared to those from non-mutated patients with BC? SUMMARY ANSWER Carboplatin and paclitaxel treatment showed similar gonadotoxicity, irrespective of the genetic background. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Studies have shown that mutations of BRCA1 gene negatively impact the ovarian reserve due to defects in DNA repair mechanisms. As a result, patients with BRCA germline mutations might be more vulnerable to chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity. Carboplatin and paclitaxel are known moderately gonadotoxic drugs, but the impact of their combination on fertility remains unclear, particularly in BRCA-mutated patients. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Cryopreserved ovarian tissue fragments from patients with BC, either carrying a BRCA1 germline mutation (n = 4) or not (n = 4), were exposed to chemotherapy using two models: (i) in vitro culture or (ii) in vivo xenotransplantation model. First, thawed ovarian tissue fragments were cultured for 3 days with carboplatin (10 µg/ml), paclitaxel (1 µM), carboplatin, and paclitaxel or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide). Next, ovarian tissue fragments from the same patients were xenografted into the peritoneum of immunodeficient mice, followed by 3-week injections with either carboplatin (50 mg/kg/week) and paclitaxel (10 mg/kg/every 3 days) or saline solution as a control. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Ovarian cortex was processed for histological analyses to assess follicle activation and survival in both experimental models. Follicle counting and morphological assessment were performed to evaluate the rates of follicles at different developmental stages, as well as the rate of atretic follicles. Immunostainings were performed for follicle activation (KL and p-RPS6), apoptosis (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) assay), and DNA repair mechanisms (γH2AX, RAD51, and DNA PKcs). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE While chemotherapy exposure did not significantly affect the proportion of primordial follicles in vitro, an increase in the proportion of quiescent follicles was observed after xenografting in the treated conditions compared to their respective controls, regardless of the presence of a BRCA mutation (BRCA+: 79.6 ± 5.07% versus 35.4 ± 8.26%, P = 0.0003; BRCA−: 81.8 ± 10.50% versus 17.9 ± 21.93%, P = 0.0014), reflecting the massive destruction of the pool of growing follicles. No difference was observed in the rate of atretic follicles, but the TUNEL assay revealed that chemotherapy, alone or in combination, increased DNA fragmentation rates (BRCA+: 37–49%; BRCA−: 43–55%) compared to the control conditions (BRCA+: 13–19%; BRCA−: 17–23%) both in vitro and in vivo. DNA repair mechanisms were affected following chemotherapy exposure, as evidenced by a significant increase in γH2AX-stained follicles in vitro (both populations) and in vivo (BRCA-mutated tissue) compared to the respective controls. Finally, chemotherapy had a similar impact on follicular atresia and apoptosis in both populations. However, BRCA-mutated tissue had lower rates of apoptotic (41% in BRCA+ versus 56% in BRCA−; P = 0.0184) and γH2AX-positive follicles (20% in BRCA+ versus 42% in BRCA−; P = 0.0142) than non-mutated fragments when exposed to carboplatin alone in vitro. LARGE SCALE DATA N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Experiments on human tissue have limitations, particularly with rare material such as ovarian tissue from young BRCA-mutated patients donated for research. The study is limited by the small sample size and high intra- and inter-patient variability. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Studies on BRCA-mutated ovarian tissue are essential to better understand how BRCA mutations impact the ovarian reserve and respond to gonadotoxic treatments. Unexpectedly, this study suggested that follicles from young BRCA-mutated patients below 35 are not more sensitive to chemotherapy than the one from non-mutated patients, although DNA repair mechanisms seems to be differentially affected. Altogether, the results can help to provide appropriate fertility preservation counseling in BRCA1-mutated patients. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study is funded by Télévie, a grant of the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique—FNRS (Grant Nos 7.4531.22 and 7.6509.24), the Fondation contre le Cancer (Grant No. FAF-C/2018/1274), and supported by Fonds Erasme. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Hematologic cancers in women: from fertility preservation to post-cancer fertility outcomes

Abstract STUDY QUESTION How do hematological characteristics affect ovarian reserve, ovarian response to ovarian stimulation, and fertility outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER Although lymphoma characteristics impact serum AMH levels, they do not affect, per se, the response to ovarian stimulation and the number of mature oocytes recovered at the time of fertility preservation; in addition, fertility in survivors of hematologic malignancies is relatively conserved. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Hematologic cancers can affect young women of reproductive age. While survival rates have improved over the years due to advances in treatment protocols, the treatments used can impact fertility. Fertility preservation methods, such as oocyte or ovarian tissue cryopreservation, are increasingly offered, but concerns remain about reduced ovarian reserve and response to ovarian stimulation in women with these cancers, which may influence the effectiveness of fertility preservation strategies. Moreover, fertility potential after hematologic cancers has been poorly studied. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a retrospective, observational bi-centric cohort study. All patients with hematologic cancer (lymphoma, leukemia, myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome) who underwent fertility preservation before gonadotoxic treatment (n = 286) from January 2013 to March 2023 were included. For fertility after cancer, and use of frozen oocytes/embryos, the endpoint date was 7 July 2023. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Only patients with lymphoma were included for analysis of ovarian reserve (n = 238) and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation (n = 230). Low ovarian reserve and impaired ovarian response to ovarian stimulation were defined as AMH <1.2 ng/ml and ≤9 mature oocytes retrieved after ovarian stimulation, respectively, according to POSEIDON criteria. A Cox regression model was used to determine predictive factors of impaired response to ovarian stimulation, low ovarian reserve, and pregnancy after cancer. Cumulative incidence of pregnancy and cumulative use of frozen oocytes/embryos was calculated in all patients suffering from hematological malignancies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE There was an impact of lymphoma characteristics on AMH levels independent of age. After adjustment based on POSEIDON Groups 3 and 4, no specific impact of lymphoma characteristics (e.g. stage, clinical, or biologic B signs) on ovarian response to ovarian stimulation was observed. Regarding post-cancer fertility in the whole population, among the women who tried to conceive, 62% achieved at least one pregnancy, and 85% of these occurred naturally. After adjustment, positive predictive factors for pregnancy were age <35 years, being in a relationship at the first oncofertility consultation, and absence of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Limitations include potential biases due to the heterogeneity of hematological conditions and the retrospective design, which may lead to missing data. Additionally, the duration of follow-up may not be sufficient to evaluate long-term fertility outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Lymphoma characteristics did not affect the response to ovarian stimulation in terms of mature oocyte retrieval, although AMH levels were impaired. Reassuring post-cancer fertility data support informed decision-making regarding fertility preservation techniques. Larger prospective studies are needed to tailor oncofertility counseling, ensuring optimized care and reproductive outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) Medical editorial support was provided by Peter Todd of Tajut Ltd (Kaiapoi, New Zealand) and was funded by AFPR (Advances in Fertility Preservation and Reproduction). The authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes after fertility-sparing management of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia: a multicentre cohort study

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What are the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes in women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) managed conservatively for fertility preservation? SUMMARY ANSWER The study found a live birth rate of 62% in patients with AH or EC after conservative treatment, with higher level of labour induction, caesarean section, and post-partum haemorrhage. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Fertility-sparing treatment is a viable option for women with AH or EC during childbearing years, but the outcomes of such treatments, especially regarding pregnancy and obstetrics, need further exploration. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This retrospective cohort study analysed data from January 2010 to October 2022, involving 269 patients from the French national register of patients with fertility-sparing management of AH/EC. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women above 18 years of age, previously diagnosed with AH/EC, and approved for fertility preservation were included. Patients were excluded if they were registered before 2010, if their treatment began <6 months before the study, or if no medical record on the pregnancy was available. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 95 pregnancies in 67 women were observed. Pregnancy was achieved using ART in 63 cases (66%) and the live birth rate was 62%, with early and late pregnancy loss at 26% and 5%, respectively. In the 59 cases resulting in a live birth, a full-term delivery occurred in 90% of cases; 36% of cases required labour induction and 39% of cases required a caesarean section. The most common maternal complications included gestational diabetes (17%) and post-partum haemorrhaging (20%). The average (±SD) birthweight was 3110 ± 736 g; there were no significant foetal malformations in the sample. No significant difference was found in pregnancy or obstetric outcomes between ART-obtained and spontaneous pregnancies. However, the incidence of induction of labour, caesarean section, and post-partum haemorrhage appears higher than in the general population. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The retrospective nature of the study may introduce bias, and the sample size might be insufficient for assessing rare obstetric complications. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study offers valuable insights for healthcare providers to guide patients who received fertility-sparing treatments for AH/EC. These pregnancies can be successful and with an acceptable live birth rate, but they seem to be managed with caution, leading to possible tendency for more caesarean sections and labour inductions. No increase in adverse obstetric outcomes was observed, with the exception of suspicion of a higher risk of post-partum haemorrhaging, to be confirmed. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding was received for this study. There are no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Menstrual cycle characteristics and incident cancer: a prospective cohort study

AbstractSTUDY QUESTIONAre menstrual cycle characteristics throughout the reproductive lifespan associated with cancer risk?SUMMARY ANSWERIrregular and long menstrual cycles throughout the reproductive lifespan were associated with increased risk of total invasive cancer, especially obesity-related cancers.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYLong and irregular menstrual cycles have been associated with lower risk of pre-menopausal breast cancer and higher risk of endometrial cancer, but associations with other malignancies are less clear.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATIONProspective cohort study. Prospective follow-up of 78 943 women participating in the Nurses’ Health Study II between 1989 and 2015.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSWe followed 78 943 pre-menopausal women without cancer history who reported the usual length and regularity of their menstrual cycles at different ages (14–17, 18–22 and 29–46 years). Cancer diagnosis was confirmed through medical record review and classified as obesity-related (colorectal, gallbladder, kidney, multiple myeloma, thyroid, pancreatic, esophageal, gastric, liver, endometrial, ovarian and post-menopausal breast) or non-obesity-related. We fitted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs of the association between menstrual cycle characteristics and cancer incidence.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEWe documented 5794 incident cancer cases during 1 646 789 person-years of follow-up. After adjusting for BMI and other potential confounders, women reporting irregular cycles at age 29–46 years had an 11% (95% CI: 2–21%) higher risk of total invasive cancer than women reporting very regular cycles at the same age. This association was limited to obesity-related cancers, with a 23% (95% CI: 9–39%) higher risk and was strongest for endometrial cancer (HR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.09–1.77). Findings were comparable for cycle characteristics earlier in life and for menstrual cycle length. Very irregular cycles at age 14–17 years were associated with significant increase in risk of colorectal cancer (HR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.02–1.81).LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONOur study might be subject to recall bias for findings pertaining to cycle characteristics in adolescence and early adulthood, as these were retrospectively reported. Generalizability to non-White women may be limited, as 96% of participants were White.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSWomen with irregular or long menstrual cycles in mid-adulthood had a statistically significantly higher risk of developing cancer, especially obesity-related cancers. This association was not limited to gynecological cancers. Obesity-related cancers may need to be added to the spectrum of long-term health consequences of long or irregular cycles, possibly warranting targeted screening among women who experience long or irregular cycles in mid-adulthood.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTThis work was supported by grants U01 CA176726, U01 HL145386 and R01 HD096033 from the National Institutes of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERN/A.

First Australian estimates of incidence and prevalence of uterine fibroids: a data linkage cohort study 2000–2022

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the estimated prevalence and incidence of uterine fibroids diagnosed in Australian women of reproductive age? SUMMARY ANSWER An estimated 7.3% of Australian women had a diagnosis of uterine fibroids by the age of 45–49 years, with age-specific incidence highest in women aged 40–44 years (5.0 cases per 1000 person-years). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Uterine fibroids are associated with a high symptom burden and may affect overall health and quality of life. Studies in different countries show a wide variation in both the prevalence (4.5–68%) and incidence (2.2–37.5 per 1000 person-years) of uterine fibroids, which may be partly explained by the type of investigation, method of case ascertainment, or the age range of the study population, necessitating the reporting of country-specific estimates. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This observational prospective cohort study using self-report survey and linked administrative data (2000–2022) included 8066 women, born between 1973 and 1978, in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A combination of self-report survey and linked administrative health data (hospital, emergency department, the Medicare Benefits Schedule, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) were used to identify women with a report of a diagnosis of uterine fibroids between 2000 and 2022. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 8066 Australian women followed for 22 years, an estimated 7.3% of women (95% CI 6.9, 7.6) had a diagnosis of uterine fibroids by the age of 45–49 years. The incidence increased with age and was highest in women aged 40–44 years (5.0 cases per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 4.3, 5.7 cases per 1000 person-years). Women with uterine fibroids were more likely to experience heavy or painful periods. They were also more likely to report low iron levels, endometriosis, and poor self-rated health and to have two or more annual visits to their general practitioner. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our estimates are based on self-report of doctor diagnosis or treatment for fibroids and/or data linked to treatment and procedure administrative records. This predominantly captures women with symptomatic fibroids, but has the potential for misclassification of asymptomatic women and an underestimate of overall prevalence and incidence. In addition, questions on fibroids were only asked in surveys when women were 37–42 years of age to 43–48 years of age, so cases at younger ages may have been underestimated (particularly in women with less severe symptoms) as these were only ascertained through data linkage. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These are the first population-based estimates of the prevalence and incidence of uterine fibroids in women of reproductive age in Australia. Establishing these first estimates will help inform health policy and health care provision in the Australian context. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The ALSWH is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. L.FW. was supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centres for Research Excellence grant (APP1153420) and G.D.M. was supported by an NHMRC Leadership Fellowship (APP2009577). The funding bodies played no role in the design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fecundability: a prospective cohort study

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) associated with reduced fecundability, defined as the probability of conceiving per menstrual cycle? SUMMARY ANSWER Overall, we observed no meaningful association between CIN and fecundability, regardless of surgical status, although a recent diagnosis of moderate or severe CIN might be associated with slightly reduced fecundability for 2 years after diagnosis. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY About 15% of couples experience infertility. Few studies have examined the influence of CIN on fertility, and the results have been inconsistent. No study has investigated the association between fecundability and pathologist-reported CIN diagnoses, particularly with respect to the recency of the specific CIN diagnoses. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective cohort study included 9586 women trying to conceive. The women were enrolled from 1 June 2007 to 3 February 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women were invited to complete a baseline questionnaire and bimonthly follow-up questionnaires for up to 12 months or until pregnancy occurred. Data on cervical cytologies and biopsies were retrieved from The National Pathology Registry (DNPR), which holds records of all cervical specimens examined in Denmark. Women were categorized based on their most severe diagnosis of CIN: no lesion, other cervical changes, mild CIN (CIN1), or moderate/severe CIN (CIN2+) with or without surgery. To investigate the association between CIN and fecundability, we computed fecundability ratios (FR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a proportional probabilities regression model. We adjusted for age at study entry, partner age, body mass index, smoking status, timing of intercourse, parity, education, number of sexual partners, and household income. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Compared with no lesion, the adjusted FRs (95% CI) for the association between CIN and fecundability were: other cervical lesions, 0.97 (0.91–1.04); CIN1, 1.04 (0.96–1.13); CIN2+ no surgery, 1.00 (0.82–1.22); and CIN2+ with surgery 0.99 (0.89–1.10). The FRs (95% CI) for a recent diagnosis (<2 years) of CIN were 0.98 (0.86–1.11) for other cervical lesions; 1.13 (0.99–1.29) for CIN1; 0.89 (0.62–1.26) for CIN2+ no surgery and 0.91 (0.75–1.10) for CIN2+ with surgery compared with the no lesion group. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION In the analyses, we adjusted for several covariates related to the women. However, we had little information on the male partners which could lead to unmeasured confounding as fecundability is a couple-based measure of fertility. Furthermore, a CIN diagnosis may not be constant as it may regress or progress spontaneously; therefore, it is possible that we have misclassified some women, especially women categorized as having normal cells or CIN1. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results contribute important knowledge to women who are concerned about their future fertility after receiving a CIN diagnosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by The Danish Cancer Society (R167-A11036-17-S2). The overall cohorts were funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD086742 and R03-HD094117). The authors report no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Infertility in patients with uterine fibroids: a debate about the hypothetical mechanisms

Abstract Fibroids are benign tumours of the myometrium and are the most common gynaecologic abnormality. Although most fibroids are asymptomatic, they can cause symptoms like heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, sexual dysfunction, pressure complaints, and infertility. The association between fibroids and infertility has been debated for decades. It is generally acknowledged that the closer the fibroid is to the uterine cavity and the endometrium lining, the more unfavourable effect it might have on fertility, reducing the odds for successful implantation and gestation. Based on the limited available literature, we propose and discuss seven hypotheses on the underlying mechanism by which fibroids may reduce fertility. (i) Fibroids can cause sexual dysfunction, as fibroids can cause dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and prolonged and heavy menstrual bleeding, which could interfere with sexual arousal and as a consequence the frequency of intercourse, resulting in a reduced probability of conception. (ii) Mechanical compression by fibroids on theinterstitial part of the fallopian tubes or deformation of uterine cavity could disturb oocyte and sperm transport. (iii) Fibroids can disturb peristalsis of the junctional zone in the myometrium, which could negatively influence oocyte and sperm transport as well as implantation. In addition, fibroids could induce a detrimental environment for implantation in other ways, by: (iv) changing the vagino-uterine microbiome; (v) disturbing the levels of inflammation and autophagy; (vi) inducing molecular changes in the endometrium; and (vii) inducing aberrant angiogenesis and altering the endometrial blood supply. After the discussion of these hypotheses, the implication of the influence of fibroids on early pregnancy loss is discussed. Surgical fibroid treatment is not tailored nor focussed on the pathophysiology of the fibroid; consequently it may be accompanied by recurrence of fibroids and risks of complications. Unravelling the pathogenic mechanisms about how fibroids influence fertility is essential to evolve classic surgical fibroid treatment. Instead of treatment of fibroid-related symptoms, the research should supports development of fibroid-targeted (pharmaceutical) treatment that is compatible with an active wish to become pregnant.

Risk of precancerous cervical lesions in women using a hormone-containing intrauterine device and other contraceptives: a register-based cohort study from Denmark

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is the risk of high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and/or is the risk of lesion progression increased in users of a hormone-containing intrauterine device (HIUD) compared with users of other contraceptive methods. SUMMARY ANSWER Women starting use of HIUD had the same subsequent risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3+ (CIN3+) as copper IUD (CIUD) users, and both groups tended to have lower risks than oral contraceptives (OC) users. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY HIUDs may cause inflammatory and immunosuppressive changes that may potentially affect the risk of persistent human papillomavirus infection and precancerous cervical lesions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A Danish population-based cohort study was conducted using register data from 2008 to 2011 on 26–50-year-old users of HIUD (n = 60 551), CIUD (n = 30 303), or OC (n = 165 627). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Within each user group, women were divided into two groups; normal cytology or abnormal diagnosis before start of contraceptive use (baseline). Follow-up histology and cytology diagnoses were registered during the 5 years after baseline. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% CI were calculated for precancerous cervical lesions in HIUD users compared with CIUD and OC users. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Women with normal cytology at baseline: at follow-up HIUD users had the same risk of CIN3 or higher (3+) as CIUD users; aRR 1.08 (95% CI 0.94–1.22). For the HIUD and CIUD groups compared with OCs, the risks of CIN3+ were lower: aRR 0.63 (95% CI 0.57–0.69) and aRR 0.58 (95% CI 0.52–0.65), respectively. The same was observed for CIN2 risks: aRR 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.96) and aRR 0.68 (95% CI 0.58–0.79) for HIUD and CIUD groups, respectively. Women with abnormal diagnosis at baseline: a lower progression risk, except for CIN2+ at baseline, was observed in HIUD users compared with OC users. Similar progression risks were found in HIUD and CIUD users. There were no differences between the three contraceptive groups in persistence or regression of present lesions. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION We adjusted for age, education, and region of residence as a proxy for socio-economic factors. Data on smoking and sexual behavior were not available thus we cannot exclude some differences between the three user groups. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These findings suggest that women may safely use HIUDs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) A.P. Møller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science, Else and Mogens Wedell-Wedellborgs Fund, Direktør Emil C. Hertz og Hustru Inger Hertz Fund, and the Fund for Development of Evidence Based Medicine in Private Specialized Practices. EL is principle investigator for a study with HPV-test-kits provided by Roche. The other authors have nothing to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

ISSN

0268-1161