Journal

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis

Papers (5)

Decoding the Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms in Xenobiotic Metabolizing Enzymes and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT Ovarian cancer (OC), the third most common and fatal gynecological malignancy, is a heterogeneous disease characterized by genomic instability. The interaction between genetic and environmental factors, including xenobiotics, plays a crucial role in OC initiation, progression, and treatment resistance. Xenobiotic metabolism (XM) is a key process for metabolizing and detoxifying environmental carcinogens, drugs, and other xenobiotics. Variations in XM genes (XMGs), such as those encoding cytochrome P450s (CYPs), UDP‐glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), sulfotransferases (SULTs), N‐acetyltransferases, and glutathione S‐transferases (GSTs), can alter enzyme activity, thereby affecting detoxification, hormone metabolism, and clinical outcomes. Previous research has shown the effects of genetic variants on XM in OC, underscoring the importance of pharmacogenomics in tailoring personalized treatments. However, challenges persist, including individual variability, study inconsistencies, and insufficient ovarian‐specific data on XM. This review provides a comprehensive overview of XM in OC. It emphasizes the importance of phase I and II enzymes in detoxification and biotransformation, and ABC transporters in drug metabolism and chemoresistance. This review provides insights into the emerging roles of CYPs, GSTs, glutathione peroxidases, myeloperoxidase, catalase, superoxide dismutase, SULTs, and UGTs, and addresses the need for further research to understand their influence on OC risk and prognosis. By addressing the gaps in ovarian‐specific XM research, including their role in susceptibility and treatment response, these insights have the potential to advance targeted therapeutic strategies and overcome the challenges of chemoresistance in OC.

A comprehensive literature review and meta‐analysis of the prevalence of pan‐cancer BRCA mutations, homologous recombination repair gene mutations, and homologous recombination deficiencies

AbstractThere is significant improvement in the outcomes following treatment with PARP inhibitors among patients with certain tumors that have BRCA mutations (BRCAm), homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutations, or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positivity. We performed a literature review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the prevalence of BRCA1/2m, HRR gene mutations, and HRD positivity across multiple cancers. There were 265 publications on BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence, 189 on HRR gene mutation prevalence, and 7 on HRD positivity prevalence. The prevalences of germline BRCA1m and BRCA2m were 7.8% and 5.7% for breast cancer, 13.5% and 6.6% for ovarian cancer, 0.5% and 3.5% for prostate cancer, and 1.1% and 4.1% for pancreatic cancer, respectively. The prevalences of somatic BRCA1m and BRCA2m were 3.4% and 2.7% for breast cancer, 4.7% and 2.9% for ovarian cancer, 5.7% and 3.2% for prostate cancer, and 1.2% and 2.9% for pancreatic cancer, respectively. We identified 189 studies with over 418,649 samples across 25 tumor types that examined mutations in one or more HRR genes other than BRCA1/2. The prevalence of mutations among HRR genes remained low (less than 1%), with ATM (5.2%), CHEK2 (1.6%), and PALB2 (0.9%) exhibiting the highest prevalence. Seven studies evaluated HRD positivity in breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer patients. The prevalence of HRD positivity was 56% overall (95% CI = 48%–64%). The understanding of biomarker prevalence across tumor types and standardization of biomarker assays could have important clinical implications.

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

0893-6692

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis