Clinical Infectious Diseases

Epidemiology of Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Among Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Compared With the General Population in the United States

AbstractBackgroundAlthough cervical cancer risk overall is elevated among women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; WLH), it is unclear whether risks are similarly elevated across histologic subtypes.MethodsData from the HIV/AIDS Cancer Match Study, a linkage of 12 US HIV and cancer registries during 1996 -2016, were used. Cervical cancers were categorized as adenocarcinoma (AC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), or other histologic subtype. Standardized incidence ratios compared rates of AC and SCC in WLH to those in general population. For WLH, risk factors for AC and SCC were evaluated using Poisson regression. Five-year survival was estimated by HIV status and histology.ResultsOverall, 62 615 cervical cancers were identified, including 609 in WLH. Compared with the general population, incidence of AC was 1.47 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03–2.05) and SCC was 3.62 times higher among WLH (95% CI: 3.31–3.94). Among WLH, there was no difference in AC rates by race/ethnicity or HIV transmission group, although SCC rates were lower among White women (vs Black) and higher among women who inject drugs (vs heterosexual transmission). Among WLH, 5-year overall survival was similar for AC (46.2%) and SCC (43.8%) but notably lower than for women not living with HIV.ConclusionsAmong WLH, AC rates were modestly elevated, whereas SCC rates were greatly elevated compared with the general population. These findings suggest there may be differences in the impact of immunosuppression and HIV in the development of AC versus SCC, given their common etiology in human papillomavirus infection.

Immunodeficiency and Cancer in 3.5 Million People Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): The South African HIV Cancer Match Study

Abstract Background We analyzed associations between immunodeficiency and cancer incidence in a nationwide cohort of people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PLWH) in South Africa. Methods We used data from the South African HIV Cancer Match Study built on HIV-related laboratory measurements from the National Health Laboratory Services and cancer records from the National Cancer Registry. We evaluated associations between time-updated CD4 cell count and cancer incidence rates using Cox proportional hazards models. We reported adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) over a grid of CD4 values and estimated the aHR per 100 CD4 cells/µL decrease. Results Of 3 532 266 PLWH, 15 078 developed cancer. The most common cancers were cervical cancer (4150 cases), Kaposi sarcoma (2262 cases), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1060 cases). The association between lower CD4 cell count and higher cancer incidence rates was strongest for conjunctival cancer (aHR per 100 CD4 cells/µL decrease: 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38–1.54), Kaposi sarcoma (aHR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.20–1.26), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14–1.22). Among infection-unrelated cancers, lower CD4 cell counts were associated with higher incidence rates of esophageal cancer (aHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00–1.11) but not breast, lung, or prostate cancer. Conclusions Lower CD4 cell counts were associated with an increased risk of developing various infection-related cancers among PLWH. Reducing HIV-induced immunodeficiency may be a potent cancer-prevention strategy among PLWH in sub-Saharan Africa, a region heavily burdened by cancers attributable to infections.

Deaths Attributable to Cancer in the US Human Immunodeficiency Virus Population During 2001–2015

AbstractBackgroundAntiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced mortality among people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but cancer remains an important cause of death. We characterized cancer-attributable mortality in the HIV population during 2001–2015.MethodsWe used data from population-based HIV and cancer registries in the United States (US). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) associating cancer diagnoses with overall mortality. Population-attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated using these HRs and the proportion of deaths preceded by cancer. Cancer-specific PAFs and cancer-attributable mortality rates were calculated for demographic subgroups, AIDS-defining cancers (Kaposi sarcoma [KS], non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], cervical cancer), and non–AIDS-defining cancers.ResultsCancer-attributable mortality was 386.9 per 100 000 person-years, with 9.2% and 5.0% of deaths attributed to non–AIDS-defining and AIDS-defining cancers, respectively. Leading cancer-attributable deaths were from NHL (3.5%), lung cancer (2.4%), KS (1.3%), liver cancer (1.1%), and anal cancer (0.6%). Overall, cancer-attributable mortality declined from 484.0 per 100 000 person-years during 2001–2005 to 313.6 per 100 000 person-years during 2011–2015, while the PAF increased from 12.6% to 17.1%; the PAF for non–AIDS-defining cancers increased from 7.2% to 11.8% during 2011–2015. Cancer-attributable mortality was highest among those aged ≥60 years (952.2 per 100 000 person-years), with 19.0% of deaths attributed to non–AIDS-defining cancers.ConclusionsAlthough cancer-attributable mortality has declined over time, it remains high and represents a growing fraction of deaths in the US HIV population. Mortality from non–AIDS-defining cancers may rise as the HIV population ages. ART access, early cancer detection, and improved cancer treatment are priorities for reducing cancer-attributable mortality.

Proportion of Incident Genital Human Papillomavirus Detections not Attributable to Transmission and Potentially Attributable to Latent Infections: Implications for Cervical Cancer Screening

Abstract Background Infections with human papillomaviruses (HPVs) may enter a latent state, and eventually become reactivated following loss of immune control. It is unclear what proportion of incident HPV detections are reactivations of previous latent infections vs new transmissions. Methods The HPV Infection and Transmission among Couples through Heterosexual activity (HITCH) cohort study prospectively followed young newly formed heterosexual partners recruited between 2005 and 2011 in Montréal, Canada. We calculated the fraction of incident HPV detections nonattributable to sexual transmission risk factors with a Bayesian Markov model. Results are the median (2.5th-97.5th percentiles) of the estimated posterior distribution. Results A total of 544 type-specific incident HPV detection events occurred in 849 participants; 33% of incident HPV detections occurred in participants whose HITCH partners were negative for that HPV type and who reported no other sex partners over follow-up. We estimate that 43% (38%–48%) of all incident HPV detections in this population were not attributable to recent sexual transmission and might be potentially reactivation of latent infections. Conclusions A positive HPV test result in many cases may be a reactivated past infection, rather than a new infection from recent sexual behaviors or partner infidelity. The potential for reactivation of latent infections in previously HPV-negative women should be considered in the context of cervical cancer screening.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Human Papillomavirus Test-and-Treat as Compared to Cytology-Based Screening for Prevention of Cervical Cancer Among Women With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol A5282

Abstract Background Cytology-based cervical cancer screening followed by confirmation and treatment of biopsy-proven high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (bHSIL) is difficult to implement in resource-constrained settings. We hypothesized that high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing followed by immediate cryotherapy of women with hrHPV (HPV screen-and-treat) may improve outcomes. Methods Randomized, open-label, phase 2, multinational clinical trial enrolling women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) age 18 or older with cervical hrHPV and having no cervical lesions or lesions appropriate for cryotherapy. Women were randomized to immediate cryotherapy (Arm A) or cytology-based screening (Arm B). For Arm A, cervical biopsies were obtained followed by cervical cryotherapy, and in Arm B, women with abnormal cytology underwent colposcopy followed by loop electroexcision procedure (LEEP) if bHSIL was detected. Women were followed through 30 months. The primary outcome was time to bHSIL detected from Month 6 through study completion. Results In total, 288 women (145 in Arm A, 143 in Arm B) were randomized: median age 35 years, 84% on antiretroviral therapy, median CD4 501 cells/mm3. In Arm A, 39 (27%) of women had bHSIL at entry, and in Arm B, 88 (62%) had abnormal cytology, 22 (15%) were diagnosed with bHSIL, 12 (8%) underwent LEEP. In follow-up, 30 (21%) and 31 (22%) developed bHSIL; time to bHSIL was similar between arms (P=.94). The prevalence of hrHPV at Month 6 was similar between arms (61% and 70%, P=.13). Conclusions HPV test-and-treat was not associated with improved bHSIL outcomes as compared to cytology-based screening. More effective treatment options are required to improve outcomes from screen-and-treat programs. Clinical Trials Registration NCT01315363.

Dose-related Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Against Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study

Abstract Background A reduced, 2-dose schedule of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been endorsed for preadolescent women on the basis of immunogenicity data from randomized trials, and limited data suggest that even 1 dose may provide sufficient protection. Surveillance of the impact of <3 vaccine doses on clinical endpoints in the targeted age group is warranted. Methods We conducted a nationwide cohort study of all women aged 17–25 years, living in Denmark between 2006 and 2016. From nationwide registries, we extracted individual-level data on vaccination with the quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine at 16 years or younger, number of doses administered, diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) or grade 3 or worse (CIN3+), and potential confounders. Using Poisson regression, we estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CIN2+ and CIN3+, according to vaccination status. Results The cohort comprised 590 083 women, of which 215 309 (36%) women were vaccinated at ≤16 years, and among these, 40 742 (19%) received <3 vaccine doses. A total of 5561 women had a diagnosis of CIN3+. We found considerable vaccine effectiveness against CIN3+ after 1 (IRR, 0.38 [95% CI, .14–.98]), 2 (IRR, 0.38 [95% CI, .22–.66]), or 3 (IRR, 0.37 [95% CI, .30–.45]) vaccine doses, compared to unvaccinated women. Results were similar for CIN2+. Conclusions We find substantial effectiveness of qHPV vaccination against high-grade cervical precancerous lesions, among women vaccinated with 1, 2, or 3 doses at ≤16 years of age. One-dose vaccination appeared to provide similar protection as 3-dose vaccination.

Primary HPV and Molecular Cervical Cancer Screening in US Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Abstract Background Primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening (PHS) utilizes oncogenic human papillomavirus (oncHPV) testing as the initial cervical cancer screening method and typically, if positive, additional reflex-triage (eg, HPV16/18-genotyping, Pap testing). While US guidelines support PHS usage in the general population, PHS has been little studied in women living with HIV (WLWH). Methods We enrolled n = 865 WLWH (323 from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study [WIHS] and 542 from WIHS-affiliated colposcopy clinics). All participants underwent Pap and oncHPV testing, including HPV16/18-genotyping. WIHS WLWH who tested oncHPV[+] or had cytologic atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASC-US+) underwent colposcopy, as did a random 21% of WLWH who were oncHPV[−]/Pap[−] (controls). Most participants additionally underwent p16/Ki-67 immunocytochemistry. Results Mean age was 46 years, median CD4 was 592 cells/µL, 95% used antiretroviral therapy. Seventy WLWH had histologically-determined cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or greater (CIN-2+), of which 33 were defined as precancer (ie, [i] CIN-3+ or [ii] CIN-2 if concurrent with cytologic high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSILs]). PHS had 87% sensitivity (Se) for precancer, 9% positive predictive value (PPV), and a 35% colposcopy referral rate (Colpo). “PHS with reflex HPV16/18-genotyping and Pap testing” had 84% Se, 16% PPV, 30% Colpo. PHS with only HPV16/18-genotyping had 24% Colpo. “Concurrent oncHPV and Pap Testing” (Co-Testing) had 91% Se, 12% PPV, 40% Colpo. p16/Ki-67 immunochemistry had the highest PPV, 20%, but 13% specimen inadequacy. Conclusions PHS with reflex HPV16/18-genotyping had fewer unnecessary colposcopies and (if confirmed) could be a potential alternative to Co-Testing in WLWH.

Antiretroviral Therapy and Detection of High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN2+) at Post-CIN Management Follow-up Among Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background We evaluated the association of antiretroviral therapy (ART), CD4+ count and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) plasma viral load (PVL) on high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) detection at follow-up after CIN management among women living with HIV (WLHIV). Methods Medline, Embase, Global Health, and PubMed were searched from 1 January 1996 to 15 January 2020. Eligible studies investigated the association of ART, CD4+ count, or HIV PVL on histology-confirmed CIN2+ detection at follow-up. Summary estimates were obtained using random-effects meta-analyses; heterogeneity was examined using I2 statistic. PROSPERO registration: CRD42018115631. Results Eight studies representing 9 populations were identified, including 1452 WLHIV followed between 6 and 33 months post-CIN management. Pooled data from 8 populations (n = 1408) suggested weak evidence of a decreased risk of CIN2+ detection at follow-up among ART users compared to ART-naive women (crude odds ratio [cOR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .36–1.36; I2 = 64.5%, P = .006; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] from 3 studies = 0.66, 95% CI: .20–2.24; I2 = 78.7%, P = .009). A significant association was observed in high-income countries (cOR = 0.24, 95% CI: .13–.45; I2 = 0.0%, P = .77) but not in low and middle-income countries (cOR = 1.13, 95% CI: .67–1.92; I2 = 18.8%, P = .30). In 3 populations, ART users with HIV PVL <50 copies/ml were less likely to have CIN2+ detection at follow-up (vs ≥50 copies/mL: cOR = 0.55, 95% CI: .32–.94; I2 = 0.0%, P = .23). There was weak evidence of decreased CIN2+ detection at follow-up among WLHIV with higher contemporary CD4+ cell counts (≥200 cells/µL vs <200 cells/µL [cOR = 0.36, 95% CI: .04–3.13; I2 = 81.3%, P = .021]) and significant evidence among women with a higher nadir CD4+ count (≥350 cells/µl vs <200 cells/µl [adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.35, 95% CI: .15–.84; I2 = 0%, P = .64]). Conclusion ART may reduce the risk of CIN2+ detection at follow-up; this effect is most likely enhanced by a combination of adequate HIV control and excisional CIN treatment. Our findings support recommendations of early ART and the integration of CIN2+ screening and management into HIV care.

Methylation in Predicting Progression of Untreated High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Abstract Background There is no prognostic test to ascertain whether cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CINs) regress or progress. The majority of CINs regress in young women, and treatments increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We investigated the ability of a DNA methylation panel (the S5 classifier) to discriminate between outcomes among young women with untreated CIN grade 2 (CIN2). Methods Baseline pyrosequencing methylation and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping assays were performed on cervical cells from 149 women with CIN2 in a 2-year cohort study of active surveillance. Results Twenty-five lesions progressed to CIN grade 3 or worse, 88 regressed to less than CIN grade 1, and 36 persisted as CIN1/2. When cytology, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping, and the S5 classifier were compared to outcomes, the S5 classifier was the strongest biomarker associated with regression vs progression. The S5 classifier alone or in combination with HPV16/18/31/33 genotyping also showed significantly increased sensitivity vs cytology when comparing regression vs persistence/progression. With both the S5 classifier and cytology set at a specificity of 38.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4–49.6), the sensitivity of the S5 classifier was significantly higher (83.6%; 95% CI, 71.9–91.8) than of cytology (62.3%; 95% CI, 49.0–74.4; P = 0.005). The highest area under the curve was 0.735 (95% CI, 0.621–0.849) in comparing regression vs progression with a combination of the S5 classifier and cytology, whereas HPV genotyping did not provide additional information. Conclusions The S5 classifier shows high potential as a prognostic biomarker to identify progressive CIN2.

Avoiding Unnecessary Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2