Journal

Biocomputing 2025

Papers (3)

Uterine fibroids show evidence of shared genetic architecture with blood pressure traits

Uterine leiomyomata (fibroids, UFs) are common, benign tumors in females, having an estimated prevalence of up to 80%. They are fibrous masses growing within the myometrium leading to chronic symptoms like dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, anemia, severe pelvic pain, and infertility. Hypertension (HTN) is a common risk factor for UFs, though less prevalent in premenopausal individuals. While observational studies have indicated strong associations between UFs and HTN, the biological mechanisms linking the two conditions remain unclear. Understanding the relationship between HTN and UFs is crucial because UFs and HTN lead to substantial comorbidities adversely impacting female health. Identifying the common underlying biological mechanisms can improve treatment strategies for both conditions. To clarify the genetic and causal relationships between UFs and BP, we conducted a bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis and evaluated the genetic correlations across BP traits and UFs. We used data from a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analysis of UFs (44,205 cases and 356,552 controls), and data from a cross-ancestry GWAS meta-analysis of BP phenotypes (diastolic BP [DBP], systolic BP [SBP], and pulse pressure [PP], N=447,758). We evaluated genetic correlation of BP phenotypes and UFs with linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC). LDSC results indicated a positive genetic correlation between DBP and UFs (Rg=0.132, p<5.0x10-5), and SBP and UFs (Rg=0.063, p<2.5x10-2). MR using UFs as the exposure and BP traits as outcomes indicated a relationship where UFs increases DBP (odds ratio [OR]=1.20, p<2.7x10-3). Having BP traits as exposures and UFs as the outcome showed that DBP and SBP increase risk for UFs (OR =1.04, p<2.2x10-3; OR=1.00, p<4.0x10-2; respectively). Our results provide evidence of shared genetic architecture and pleiotropy between HTN and UFs, suggesting common biological pathways driving their etiologies. Based on these findings, DBP appears to be a stronger risk factor for UFs compared to SBP and PP.

Constructing a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for uterine fibroids using publicly available data highlights need for inclusive genetic research

Uterine leiomyomata, or fibroids, are common gynecological tumors causing pelvic and menstrual symptoms that can negatively affect quality of life and child-bearing desires. As fibroids grow, symptoms can intensify and lead to invasive treatments that are less likely to preserve fertility. Identifying individuals at highest risk for fibroids can aid in access to earlier diagnoses. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) quantify genetic risk to identify those at highest risk for disease. Utilizing the PRS software PRS-CSx and publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from FinnGen and Biobank Japan, we constructed a multi-ancestry (META) PRS for fibroids. We validated the META PRS in two cross-ancestry cohorts. In the cross-ancestry Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network cohort, the META PRS was significantly associated with fibroid status and exhibited 1.11 greater odds for fibroids per standard deviation increase in PRS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 - 1.17, p = 5.21x10-5). The META PRS was validated in two BioVU cohorts: one using ICD9/ICD10 codes and one requiring imaging confirmation of fibroid status. In the ICD cohort, a standard deviation increase in the META PRS increased the odds of fibroids by 1.23 (95% CI: 1.15 - 1.32, p = 9.68x10-9), while in the imaging cohort, the odds increased by 1.26 (95% CI: 1.18 - 1.35, p = 2.40x10-11). We subsequently constructed single ancestry PRS for FinnGen (European ancestry [EUR]) and Biobank Japan (East Asian ancestry [EAS]) using PRS-CS and discovered a nominally significant association in the eMERGE cohort within fibroids and EAS PRS but not EUR PRS (95% CI: 1.09 - 1.20, p = 1.64x10-7). These findings highlight the strong predictive power of multi-ancestry PRS over single ancestry PRS. This study underscores the necessity of diverse population inclusion in genetic research to ensure precision medicine benefits all individuals equitably.

Social Determinants of Health and Lifestyle Risk Factors Modulate Genetic Susceptibility for Women’s Health Outcomes

Women's health conditions are influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Understanding these factors individually and their interactions is crucial for implementing preventative, personalized medicine. However, since genetics and environmental exposures, particularly social determinants of health (SDoH), are correlated with race and ancestry, risk models without careful consideration of these measures can exacerbate health disparities. We focused on seven women's health disorders in the All of Us Research Program: breast cancer, cervical cancer, endometriosis, ovarian cancer, preeclampsia, uterine cancer, and uterine fibroids. We computed polygenic risk scores (PRSs) from publicly available weights and tested the effect of the PRSs on their respective phenotypes as well as any effects of genetic risk on age at diagnosis. We next tested the effects of environmental risk factors (BMI, lifestyle measures, and SDoH) on age at diagnosis. Finally, we examined the impact of environmental exposures in modulating genetic risk by stratified logistic regressions for different tertiles of the environment variables, comparing the effect size of the PRS. Of the twelve sets of weights for the seven conditions, nine were significantly and positively associated with their respective phenotypes. None of the PRSs was associated with different ages at diagnoses in the time-to-event analyses. The highest environmental risk group tended to be diagnosed earlier than the low and medium-risk groups. For example, the cases of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, and uterine fibroids in highest BMI tertile were diagnosed significantly earlier than the low and medium BMI groups, respectively). PRS regression coefficients were often the largest in the highest environment risk groups, showing increased susceptibility to genetic risk. This study's strengths include the diversity of the All of Us study cohort, the consideration of SDoH themes, and the examination of key risk factors and their interrelationships. These elements collectively underscore the importance of integrating genetic and environmental data to develop more precise risk models, enhance personalized medicine, and ultimately reduce health disparities.

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC