Journal

Asian Journal of Surgery

Papers (112)

Application of Da Vinci robotic surgery system in cervical cancer: A single institution experience of 557 cases

Conflicting data have been published regarding the oncologic appropriateness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the treatment of cervical cancer. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether our experience in the treatment of early cervical cancer using a robotic surgical approach was safe and oncologically effective. The data of 557 patients with cervical cancer treated by robotic surgery were retrospectively collected, including the perioperative and survival outcomes. Tumor stage was based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Of the 557 patients, 196 (35.2%) patients were stage IA1 to IB1, and 304 (54.6%) patients were stage IB2 to I1A2. Also included were 57 (10.2%) patients with either recurrent or persistent disease following concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Two patients (0.4%) experienced severe intraoperative complications and 11 patients (2.0%) developed postoperative complications. A stratified analysis of survival was conducted in 91 patients who met a follow-up time of 3-year or more. The median follow-up time was 49 (range, 6-57) months. Both the 3-year DFS and OS of early-stage (stage IA1 to IB1) cervical cancer were 97.6%. For patients with locally advanced (stage IB2 to IIA2) disease, DFS and OS were 88.1% and 90.5%, respectively. The patients with recurrent or persistent disease had DFS and OS of 62.5%. Our study results demonstrated that the robotic surgical approach could achieve satisfying therapeutic outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, with a low complication rate. For advanced cervical cancer patients with recurrent or persistent disease following concurrent chemoradiotherapy, robotic surgery undertaken as supplementary therapy may improve prognosis. However, there remains a need for additional prospective data reporting long-term survival of cervical cancer patients treated with a robotic surgical approach.

Effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy on the quality of life in Korean BRCA mutation carriers

This study aimed to compare the quality of life (QOL), psychosocial status, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms between the risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) and non-RRSO groups comprising BRCA mutation carriers and to evaluate the effect of timing of RRSO on those aspects. This cross-sectional study recruited BRCA mutation carriers aged ≥35 years between September 2015 and September 2016. Demographic data of carriers were collected. Outcomes were measured using the questionnaires addressing QOL, anxiety, depression, optimism, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms. Of 52 participants, 30 (57.7%) underwent RRSO, whereas 22 (42.3%) did not. In the RRSO group, 16 (53.3%) and 14 (46.7%) women underwent RRSO before and after menopause, respectively. The mean age in the RRSO group was higher than that in the non-RRSO group (49.8 vs. 42.1 years, respectively, p = 0.002). The scores for QOL, anxiety, depression, optimism, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms were similar between both groups. In the multivariate analysis, RRSO uptake was associated with worse physical QOL (coefficient, -5.350; 95% confidence interval, -10.593 to -0.108). With respect to the timing of RRSO, only the mental QOL was significantly lower in the postmenopausal RRSO group than in the premenopausal RRSO group (39.2 vs. 43.7, respectively, p = 0.043). We could not find any difference in mental QOL, psychosocial status, sexual function, and menopausal symptoms between the RRSO and non-RRSO groups. RRSO uptake only affected worse physical QOL. These results will help physicians counsel BRCA mutation carriers about the effect of RRSO on QOL.

Learning curve could affect oncologic outcome of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer

Recent prospective studies have shown poorer oncologic outcomes following minimally invasive surgery, which has led many surgeons to deeply inspect their practices. We reviewed our experience and evaluated the results of radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. This retrospective study included patients with early stage cervical cancer (Ia1 - IIa1) who were treated with radical hysterectomy from May 2006 to Dec 2016. Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical approach: radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH), laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH), and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH). Learning curves of each type of surgery were obtained using the cumulative sum method. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. To analyze the learning curve of a single surgeon, 89 patients were selected from the whole population. Learning curves of each group showed two distinct phases. The minimum number of cases required to achieve surgical improvement were 16 in RAH, 13 in LRH, and 21 in RRH. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival did not vary between RAH and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (p = .828 and p = .757, respectively). However, when stratified by the phases of the learning curves, patients included in the early phase of MIS showed a poorer PFS (p = .014). Surgical proficiency could significantly affect the oncologic outcome in MIS. A prospective study regarding sufficient surgical competence is necessary for elaborate analysis of the feasibility of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

ISSN

1015-9584