Journal

Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery

Papers (17)

Sentinel Lymph Node Detection Using SPECT and Gamma Probe in Low‐Risk Endometrial Cancer: Efficacy and Factors Associated With Detection Failure

ABSTRACT Introduction This study examined factors that affected sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification of patients with endometrial cancer having a preoperative estimation of low recurrent risk. Methods This study included 97 patients with endometrial cancer who attempted to identify SLN using a uterine cervical injection of technetium‐99 m phytate under laparoscopic or robotic‐assisted surgery at our institute. A preoperative single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and intraoperative gamma probe were used to detect hot nodes. Multiple clinical factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), and so on, were investigated for their association with SLN mapping failure. Results Among 97 cases, SPECT failed to detect SLN unilaterally in 38 cases (39%) and on both sides in 9 cases (9%). Meanwhile, the gamma probe failed to detect SLN unilaterally in 23 cases (24%) and on both sides in 3 cases (3%). While only age was significantly associated with SLN detection failure using the SPECT detection system, both age and BMI were significantly associated with SLN detection failure using the gamma probe detection system. When limiting to the preoperative SLN detection failure cohort of 47 cases, there was a strong association between intraoperative SLN detection failure and BMI, but not age. Conclusion The SLN biopsy system was effectively applied to patients with endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Attempts to improve SLN identification in older patients and those with obesity are warranted to obtain maximum benefits of MIS for low‐ or medium‐risk cases.

A Novel Port and Arm Placement Strategy for the Hugo Robotic‐Assisted Surgery ( RAS ) System in Gynecologic Oncology: Initial Experience and Technical Considerations

ABSTRACT Introduction The Hugo robotic‐assisted surgery (RAS) system is a novel surgical platform that expands the potential for minimally invasive procedures in gynecologic oncology. Early studies have shown promise, but the optimal configuration of ports and robotic arms requires further clarification. This study aimed to introduce a refined strategy for optimizing port placement and robotic arm arrangement with the Hugo RAS system and compare its performance to previously employed configurations. Materials and Surgical Technique Initial experiences in two cases of early‐stage endometrial cancer are presented. A new configuration was developed through iterative discussions and a review of emerging Hugo RAS literature. Port placement and arm arrangement with three arms on the patient's right side and one on the left—were designed to expand the assistant's working space. Two patients with stage IA endometrial cancer underwent surgery with this approach. Operative times, blood loss, and procedural details were evaluated. Discussion Both procedures were completed successfully with improved instrument articulation, reduced arm collisions, and enhanced workflow. Compared with previous strategies, this new configuration provided better ergonomics, minimized interference between robotic and assistant instruments, and expanded the operative field for both the first and second assistants, enabling smoother transvaginal specimen retrieval. Initial findings suggest that optimizing both port placement and arm settings enhances the surgical environment for the Hugo RAS system and may improve procedural efficiency and patient outcomes. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings and potentially establish standardized guidelines.

Implementation of the Hugo Robotic System: Early Outcomes and Learning Curves in Hysterectomy by Surgeons With and Without Prior Robotic Experience

ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize early learning curves for two gynecologic oncologists and their first assistants using the Hugo robotic‐assisted surgery system for hysterectomy in benign uterine disease or FIGO stage IA endometrial cancer. Methods We retrospectively examined the first 43 Hugo hysterectomies performed at our center by two surgeons: Surgeon A (experienced with da Vinci) and Surgeon B (robotics‐naïve), assisted by three primary assistants (A, B, and C). We analyzed baseline patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes (operative time, docking time, console time, blood loss, complications, length of stay), and plotted learning curves using operative time trends and CUSUM analysis. Surgeon and assistant group comparisons used t ‐test or Kruskal–Wallis and chi‐square as appropriate, with p  < 0.05 considered significant. Complications graded ≥ Clavien–Dindo II were considered notable. Results Patient demographics were similar between groups. Surgeon A achieved significantly shorter operative times (128.6 ± 23.7 vs. 149.8 ± 19.6 min, p  = 0.003) and console times (90.9 ± 20.4 vs. 115.6 ± 18.9 min, p  < 0.001) versus Surgeon B. Docking times did not differ significantly. No conversions occurred, and complication rates were low and comparable (4% vs. 11%, p  = 0.56). CUSUM analysis revealed that Surgeon A's operative times stabilized by case 5, while Surgeon B required approximately 15 cases to reach comparable proficiency. Assistants demonstrated decreasing docking times, with no significant differences among groups. Conclusions In early Hugo RAS adoption, prior robotic experience led to a shorter learning curve, but robotics‐naïve surgeons achieved proficiency within ~15 cases without compromising safety. Assistants also rapidly mastered docking. These findings support safe and efficient implementation of new robotic platforms with structured training.

Low Geriatric‐8 Score as a Potential Risk Factor for Minimally Invasive Surgery in Elderly Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies

ABSTRACT Background The Geriatric‐8 (G8) is a validated screening tool for identifying frailty in elderly cancer patients. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly performed in older adults with gynecologic malignancies, few studies have evaluated the association between G8 scores and perioperative complications in this setting. Methods This single‐center retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent MIS for gynecologic malignancies between January 2019 and March 2024. G8 scores were retrospectively calculated using medical records, with a threshold of ≤ 12.5 indicating geriatric risk. Perioperative complications were defined as either (1) Clavien‐Dindo classification or CTCAE version 5 grade II or higher within 30 days postoperatively or (2) the need for rehabilitation intervention due to a decline in activities of daily living (ADL). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associated factors. Results A total of 68 patients were included (median age: 72.5 years). The median G8 score was significantly lower in the complication group than in the non‐complication group (12.5 vs. 14.5, p  = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, a G8 score ≤ 12.5 was independently associated with perioperative complications (OR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.38–11.70, p  = 0.011). No significant associations were found for operative time, hysterectomy, or lymphadenectomy. Conclusion A low G8 score was independently associated with perioperative complications and may be useful for preoperative risk assessment in elderly patients undergoing MIS for gynecologic malignancies.

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

1758-5902