Journal

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®

Papers (4)

Association of Palliative Care With Readmission and Resource Utilization in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: A National Perspective

Objective Palliative care (PC) utilization in cancer care has been shown to alleviate symptoms, increase goals of care discussions, and reduce invasive end of life measures. This study examined the association of inpatient PC consultation with readmission and hospitalization costs among patients with ovarian cancer. Methods All records for women (≥18 years) hospitalized with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer were tabulated from the 2010-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable logistic, Poisson, and linear regressions were used to evaluate the association of PC consultation during index hospitalization with length of stay, rates of 30-day non-elective readmission, time to readmission, as well as overall number of readmissions and hospitalization costs. Results Of an estimated 285,487 patients included, 25,957 (9.0%) received a PC consultation, with an increase from 5.1 to 11.7% ( P < 0.001) across the period. Factors associated with use of PC included: increasing age (AOR 1.03/yr, 95% CI 1.03-1.03, P < 0.001) and Elixhauser comorbidity index (AOR 1.19/point, 95% CI 1.17-1.21). PC was associated with lower risk adjusted rates of 30 day (11.63%, 95% CI 11.0-12.3 vs 20.25%, 95% CI 20.0-20.6) non-elective readmission ( P < 0.001). The adjusted incident rate ratio of readmission after PC consultation was 0.41 [0.38-0.43], P < 0.001. Patients receiving PC additionally had less cost associated with their index hospital stay; −$2,407 [−$2,669.86- −$2,144.43], P < 0.001). Conclusions Inpatient PC consults appear to be associated with reduced medical readmissions for patients with ovarian cancer, as well as decreased hospital resource use, however disparities exist. Continued increase in access and early PC referral should be considered.

Non-Surgical Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Advanced Ovarian Cancer patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Malignant bowel obstruction is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Many patients aren’t suitable for, or decline, surgical decompression. The outcomes for this frail group of patients are not well characterized. Aim: To evaluate survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients who undergo non-surgical management of malignant bowel obstruction. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: Online literature search of Pubmed, Embase and Medline libraries up until December 2020. Searching abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacting experts in the field. Selection Criteria: Studies that investigated non-surgical management of confirmed bowel obstruction in advanced ovarian cancer patients were included. All levels of evidence including RCTs, cohort studies and case-series if they included greater than 5 patients. Data Collection and Analysis: The studies were independently chosen by two reviewers who extracted and analyzed the data separately through OpenMeta Analyst software. Study quality was assessed using the JADAD score and the Newcastle Ottawa Score. Results: 24 studies met the eligibility criteria for the systematic review and 9 for the meta-analysis. Median survival of patients managed non-surgically for bowel obstruction was 44 days (95% CI 38-49 days, I 2 = 0%, P = 0.128). Conclusion: The quality of studies was relatively low, however the evidence shows that non-surgical management of bowel obstruction results in a short life expectancy but with controlled symptoms. Where quality of life is the main concern, this may be a feasible and effective strategy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

ISSN

1049-9091