Zsofia K. Stadler

Optimizing Mainstreaming of Genetic Testing in Parallel With Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer Tumor Testing: How Do We Maximize Our Impact?

PURPOSE Although germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for all patients with ovarian cancer (OC) and some patients with endometrial cancer (EC), uptake remains low with multiple barriers. Our center performs GT in parallel with somatic testing via a targeted sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT) and initiates testing in oncology clinics (mainstreaming). We sought to optimize our GT processes for OC/EC. METHODS We performed a quality improvement study to evaluate our GT processes within gynecologic surgery/medical oncology clinics. All eligible patients with newly diagnosed OC/EC were identified for GT and tracked in a REDCap database. Clinical data and GT rates were collected by the study team, who reviewed data for qualitative themes. RESULTS From February 2023 to April 2023, we identified 116 patients with newly diagnosed OC (n = 57) and EC (n = 59). Patients were mostly White (62%); English was the preferred language for 90%. GT was performed in 52 (91%) patients with OC (seven external, 45 MSK-IMPACT) and in 44 (75%) patients with EC (three external, 41 MSK-IMPACT). GT results were available within 3 months for 100% and 95% of patients with OC and EC, respectively. Reasons for not undergoing GT included being missed by the clinical team where there was no record that GT was recommended, feeling overwhelmed, financial and privacy concerns, and language barriers. In qualitative review, we found that resources were concentrated in the initial visit with little follow-up to encourage GT at subsequent points of care. CONCLUSION A mainstreaming approach that couples somatic and germline GT resulted in high testing rates in OC/EC; however, barriers were identified. Processes that encourage GT at multiple care points and allow self-directed, multilingual digital consenting should be piloted.

Microsatellite Instability–High Endometrial Cancers with MLH1 Promoter Hypermethylation Have Distinct Molecular and Clinical Profiles

Abstract Purpose: Microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) endometrial carcinomas are underpinned by distinct mechanisms of DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D). We sought to characterize the clinical and genetic features of MSI-H endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic mutations in MMR genes or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (MLH1ph). Experimental Design: Of > 1,100 patients with endometrial cancer that underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing, 184 had MSI-H endometrial cancers due to somatic MMR mutations or MLH1ph, or harbored pathogenic germline MMR mutations. Clinicopathologic features, mutational landscape, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) scores were compared among MMR-D groups using nonparametric tests. Log-rank tests were used for categorical associations; Kaplan–Meier method and Wald test based on Cox proportional hazards models were employed for continuous variables and survival analyses. Results: Compared with patients with germline (n = 25) and somatic (n = 39) mutations, patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers (n = 120) were older (P < 0.001), more obese (P = 0.001) and had more advanced disease at diagnosis (P = 0.025). MLH1ph endometrial cancers were enriched for JAK1 somatic mutations as opposed to germline MMR-D endometrial cancers which showed enrichment for pathogenic ERBB2 mutations. MLH1ph endometrial cancers exhibited lower tumor mutational burden and TIL scores compared with endometrial cancers harboring germline or somatic MMR mutations (P < 0.01). MLH1ph endometrial cancer patients had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on univariate analysis, but in multivariable models, stage at diagnosis remained the only predictor of survival. For stage I/II endometrial cancer, two-year PFS was inferior for patients with MLH1ph endometrial cancers compared with germline and somatic MMR groups (70% vs. 100%, respectively). Conclusions: MLH1ph endometrial cancers likely constitute a distinct clinicopathologic entity compared with germline and somatic MMR-D ECs with potential treatment implications.

Age-Related Germline Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Focus on Early-Onset Cases

PURPOSE Early-onset endometrial cancer (eoEC) is increasing, and germline drivers may be enriched in younger patients. We sought to define germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) in those with EC by age. METHODS We identified patients with EC who underwent clinical tumor-normal sequencing from December 2014 to June 2021 and collected clinical variables. Logistic regression models evaluated associations between age at EC diagnosis and presence of gPV, biallelic inactivation, and Lynch Syndrome (LS). Age categories were defined as early-onset (eoEC, EC < 50 years) and late-onset (EC ≥ 70 years) and were compared with those diagnosed ages 50-69 years. RESULTS Among 1,625 patients with EC, the median age at diagnosis was 63 (range, 24-96) years. We observed gPV in 28 (16%) of 170 patients with eoEC, 152 (14%) of 1,066 patients diagnosed age 50-69 years, and 36 (9%) of 389 patients with late-onset EC ( P = .016). LS was enriched in eoEC, with 6.5% of patients diagnosed age <50 years having LS. In multivariable models compared with those with EC diagnosed age 50-69 years, eoEC was more likely to exhibit biallelic inactivation (odds ratio, 3.34 [95% CI, 1.44 to 7.35]) and be associated with LS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.49 [95% CI, 1.63 to 7.01]). Among early-onset EC, 14 (50%) of 28 gPV were high penetrance and 14 (50%) of 28 exhibited biallelic inactivation. However, heterogeneity was observed, and rates of gPV were 8.9% and 19%, biallelic inactivation was 0% and 11%, and LS was 2.2% and 8% in those diagnosed age <40 years and 40-49 years, respectively. CONCLUSION Rates of gPV, biallelic inactivation, and LS differ across age groups for EC, with high-penetrant genes driving tumorigenesis enriched in younger patients. However, very-early-onset EC may have different drivers and necessitates more research.

Germline Pathogenic Variants and Genetic Counseling by Ancestry in Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Mutations in ovarian cancer risk genes are found in women of diverse ancestries, supporting genetic testing for ALL

Risk-Reducing Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy for Ovarian Cancer: A Review and Clinical Guide for Hereditary Predisposition Genes

Pathogenic germline variants underlie up to 20% of ovarian cancer (OC) and are associated with varying degrees of risk for OC. For mutations in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/ 2, the role of risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in cancer prevention is well-established and improves mortality. However, in moderate-penetrance genes where the degree of risk for OC is less precisely defined, the role of RRSO is more controversial. Although national guidelines have evolved to incorporate gene-specific recommendations, studies demonstrate significant variations in practice. Given this, our multidisciplinary group has reviewed the available literature on risk estimates for genes associated with OC, incorporated levels of evidence, and set thresholds for consideration of RRSO. We found that the benefit of RRSO is well-established for pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2 as well as BRIP1 and RAD51C/ D where the risk of OC is elevated beyond our threshold for RRSO. In PALB2, RRSO is particularly controversial as newer studies consistently demonstrate an increased risk of OC that is dependent on family history, making uniform recommendations challenging. Additionally, new guidelines for Lynch syndrome provide gene-specific risks, questioning the role of RRSO, and even hysterectomy, for MSH6 and PMS2 mutation carriers. Given these uncertainties, shared decision making should be used around RRSO with discussion of individual risk factors, family history, and adverse effects of surgery and premature menopause. Herein, we provide a clinical guide and counseling points.