ZHZhiqiang Han
Papers(3)
Effectiveness and saf…The value of microend…Risk of ovarian cance…
Collaborators(10)
Beibei WangBin YangChaoyang SunChenzhao FengChunlin DongDa ZhuFuxia LiGang ChenLiangliang WangRourou Xiao
Institutions(5)
Huazhong University O…Bengbu Medical CollegeWuxi Fourth Peoples H…Unknown InstitutionZhongnan Hospital of …

Papers

Effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel and platinum as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer (OC). Patients administered platinum combined with nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for epithelial OC, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer from July 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Adverse events (AEs) were examined. Subgroup analysis was performed. Seventy-two patients (median age, 54.5 years; range, 20.0-79.0 years) were evaluated, including 12 and 60 administered neoadjuvant therapy and primary surgery with subsequent chemotherapy, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 25.6 months, and the median PFS was 26.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]=24.0-29.3) months in the whole patient population. In the neoadjuvant subgroup, the median PFS was 26.7 (95% CI=22.9-30.5) months vs. 30.1 (95% CI=23.1-37.1) months in the primary surgery subgroup. Twenty-seven patients were administered nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin and had a median PFS of 30.3 (95% CI=not available [NA]-NA) months. The commonest grade 3-4 AEs included anemia (15.3%), white blood cell decreased (11.1%), and neutrophil count decreased (20.8%). No drug-related hypersensitivity reactions occurred. Nab-paclitaxel plus platinum as first-line treatment in OC was associated with a favorable prognosis and was tolerable in patients with OC.

The value of microendoscopy in the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions and cervical microinvasive carcinoma

Cervical cancer is still one of the main causes of death in females. Conventional diagnostic tools such as colposcopy are still unsatisfactory, so accurate diagnostic tools for cervical diseases are needed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform a clinical study to evaluate the value of microendoscopic imaging systems in the diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions and cervical microinvasive carcinoma (MIC). Totally 106 patients ranging in age from 23 to 67 years were recruited. All patients had abnormal thin-layer cytology (TCT) results (≥ low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity. Each patient was first subjected to ordinary colposcopy, followed by microendoscopy and biopsy. All results of the colposcopy and microendoscopy images were compared to the histopathological diagnosis. Characteristics of pathological blood vessels were easily distinguished by microendoscopy compared with ordinary colposcopy. The diagnostic agreement rate of microendoscopy with the pathological diagnosis was higher (95.3%) than that of ordinary colposcopy (37.7%) (weighted kappa = 0.863, P < .01). When diagnosing HSIL and more advanced disease, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the microendoscopic diagnosis were significantly higher than those of ordinary colposcopy (97.6 and 38.1%), (95.5 and 63.6%), (98.8 and 80.0%), (91.3 and 21.2%) and (97.7 and 43.4%), respectively. This study shows that microendoscopy has important value in the diagnosis of cervical lesions which can provide real-time diagnosis in vivo without staining, particularly for lesions that are not sensitive to acetic acid staining.

1Works
3Papers
18Collaborators
Ovarian NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsUterine Cervical Neoplasms