Investigator

Zhihua Liu

Director · National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology

ZLZhihua Liu
Papers(8)
Systematic benchmarki…OTUB2 silencing promo…RUNX1-IT1 acts as a s…USP48 Sustains Chemor…JOSD1 inhibits mitoch…The deubiquitinase US…Comparison between la…Targeting de novo pyr…
Collaborators(10)
Qingyu LuoXiaowei WuXiao YuZhumei CuiYabing NanHongyan ChenJianxin GuoJiaqi LiuJinghe LangLan Chen
Institutions(6)
State Key Laboratory …Dana Farber Cancer In…Yuhuangding HospitalArmy Medical Universi…Nanfang HospitalChinese Academy of Me…

Papers

Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study

To compare 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm with visible or invisible tumors. We retrospectively compared the oncological outcomes of 1,484 cervical cancer patients with IB1 and tumor size <2 cm on final pathology, who received ARH (n=899) or LRH (n=585) between January 2004 and December 2016. Patients were divided into visible tumor subgroup (ARH: n=668, LRH: n=444) and invisible tumor subgroup (ARH: n=231, LRH: n=141) according to tumor type. LRH and ARH showed similar 5-year DFS and OS rates (93.3% vs. 93.1%, p=0.997; 96.2% vs. 97.5%, p=0.351) in total study population. LRH was not associated with worse 5-year DFS rate (hazard ratio [HR]=0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.58-1.58; p=0.871) or OS rate (HR=1.37; 95% CI=0.65-2.89; p=0.409) by multivariable analysis. In the visible tumor subgroups, LRH and ARH showed similar 5-year DFS and OS rates (91.9% vs. 91.9%, p=0.933; 95.0% vs. 96.9%, p=0.276), and LRH was not associated with worse 5-year DFS or OS rate (p=0.804, p=0.324). In the invisible tumor subgroups, LRH and ARH also showed similar 5-year DFS and OS rates (97.3% vs. 97.1%, p=0.815; 100% vs. 99.5%, p=0.449), and LRH was not associated with worse 5-year DFS rate (p=0.723). Among patients with stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm, whether the tumor is visible or not, the oncological outcomes of LRH and ARH among cervical cancer patients are comparable. This suggests that LRH may be suitable for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm with visible or invisible tumors. International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Identifier: CHiCTR180017778.

367Works
8Papers
29Collaborators
Esophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmOvarian NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Positions

1996–

Director

National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College · State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology

1993–

Postdoc

Washington State University · Plant physiology and plant molecular biology laboratory

Education

1993

Ph.D.

Peking University

1990

M.S.

China Agricultural University

1987

B.S.

Peking University