Yu-Hong Zhao

Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform cancer diagnosis, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. Objective We performed an umbrella review to summarize and critically evaluate the evidence for the AI-based imaging diagnosis of cancers. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and IEEE databases were searched for relevant systematic reviews from inception to June 19, 2024. Two independent investigators abstracted data and assessed the quality of evidence, using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. We further assessed the quality of evidence in each meta-analysis by applying the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Diagnostic performance data were synthesized narratively. Results In a comprehensive analysis of 158 included studies evaluating the performance of AI algorithms in noninvasive imaging diagnosis across 8 major human system cancers, the accuracy of the classifiers for central nervous system cancers varied widely (ranging from 48% to 100%). Similarities were observed in the diagnostic performance for cancers of the head and neck, respiratory system, digestive system, urinary system, female-related systems, skin, and other sites. Most meta-analyses demonstrated positive summary performance. For instance, 9 reviews meta-analyzed sensitivity and specificity for esophageal cancer, showing ranges of 90%-95% and 80%-93.8%, respectively. In the case of breast cancer detection, 8 reviews calculated the pooled sensitivity and specificity within the ranges of 75.4%-92% and 83%-90.6%, respectively. Four meta-analyses reported the ranges of sensitivity and specificity in ovarian cancer, and both were 75%-94%. Notably, in lung cancer, the pooled specificity was relatively low, primarily distributed between 65% and 80%. Furthermore, 80.4% (127/158) of the included studies were of high quality according to the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist, with the remaining studies classified as medium quality. The GRADE assessment indicated that the overall quality of the evidence was moderate to low. Conclusions Although AI shows great potential for achieving accelerated, accurate, and more objective diagnoses of multiple cancers, there are still hurdles to overcome before its implementation in clinical settings. The present findings highlight that a concerted effort from the research community, clinicians, and policymakers is required to overcome existing hurdles and translate this potential into improved patient outcomes and health care delivery. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42022364278; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022364278

AI-Derived Blood Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Emerging evidence underscores the potential application of artificial intelligence (AI) in discovering noninvasive blood biomarkers. However, the diagnostic value of AI-derived blood biomarkers for ovarian cancer (OC) remains inconsistent. Objective We aimed to evaluate the research quality and the validity of AI-based blood biomarkers in OC diagnosis. Methods A systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Studies examining the diagnostic accuracy of AI in discovering OC blood biomarkers were identified. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–AI tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were estimated using a bivariate model for the diagnostic meta-analysis. Results A total of 40 studies were ultimately included. Most (n=31, 78%) included studies were evaluated as low risk of bias. Overall, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 85% (95% CI 83%-87%), 91% (95% CI 90%-92%), and 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.96), respectively. For contingency tables with the highest accuracy, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 95% (95% CI 90%-97%), 97% (95% CI 95%-98%), and 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00), respectively. Stratification by AI algorithms revealed higher sensitivity and specificity in studies using machine learning (sensitivity=85% and specificity=92%) compared to those using deep learning (sensitivity=77% and specificity=85%). In addition, studies using serum reported substantially higher sensitivity (94%) and specificity (96%) than those using plasma (sensitivity=83% and specificity=91%). Stratification by external validation demonstrated significantly higher specificity in studies with external validation (specificity=94%) compared to those without external validation (specificity=89%), while the reverse was observed for sensitivity (74% vs 90%). No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis. Conclusions AI algorithms demonstrate satisfactory performance in the diagnosis of OC using blood biomarkers and are anticipated to become an effective diagnostic modality in the future, potentially avoiding unnecessary surgeries. Future research is warranted to incorporate external validation into AI diagnostic models, as well as to prioritize the adoption of deep learning methodologies. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42023481232; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023481232

Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Gynecological Cancers: A Systematic Review

The present study aims to summarize the current biomarker landscape in gynecological cancers (GCs) and incorporate bioinformatics analysis to highlight specific biological processes. The literature was retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library. The final search was conducted on December 7, 2022. Prospective registration was completed with the PROSPERO with registration number CRD42023477145. This systematic review covered proteomic research on biomarkers for cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. The PANTHER classification system was used to classify the shortlisted candidate biomarkers (CBs), and the STRING database was utilized to visualize protein-protein interaction networks. A total of 23 articles were included in this systematic review. Consistently regulated CBs in the GCs include collagen alpha-2(I) chain, collagen alpha-1(III) chain, collagen alpha-2(V) chain, calreticulin, protein disulfide-isomerase A3, heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 5, prolyl 4-hydroxylase, beta polypeptide, fibrinogen alpha chain, fibrinogen gamma chain, apolipoprotein B-100, apolipoprotein C-IV, and apolipoprotein M. In conclusion, collagens, fibrinogens, chaperones, and apolipoproteins were revealed to be replicated in GCs and to be regulated consistently. These CBs contribute to GC etiology and physiology by participating in collagen fibril organization, blood coagulation, protein folding in endoplasmic reticulum, and lipid transporter activity.

Association of pre-diagnosis specific color groups of fruit and vegetable intake with ovarian cancer survival: results from the ovarian cancer follow-up study (OOPS)

Pre-diagnosis fruit and vegetable intake from various color groups, especially the green and red/purple ones, may improve OC survival.

Diet quality and survival after ovarian cancer: results from an ovarian cancer follow-up study (OOPS)

Owing to the limited studies and controversial evidence, the connection between diet quality and survival of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) has been indistinct. Our findings indicate that high CHEI was associated with an improved OS for patients with OC.

The association of macronutrient quality and its interactions with energy intake with survival among patients with ovarian cancer: results from a prospective cohort study

Emerging evidence supports shifting the focus from the quantity of macronutrients to quality to obtain greater benefits for the prognosis of ovarian cancer (OC). Additionally, despite the high relevance between macronutrient quality and quantity, the interaction of these parameters on OC survival remains unknown. A multidimensional macronutrient quality index (MQI) was applied to investigate the association between overall macronutrient quality and the survival of patients with OC. A prospective cohort study was conducted with 701 females diagnosed with OC who were enrolled from 2015 to 2020. Dietary intake information was obtained from a validated food frequency questionnaire. The MQI was calculated based on 3 quality indices: carbohydrate quality index (CQI), fat quality index (FQI), and protein quality index (PQI). Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted to calculate HRs and 95% CIs. Furthermore, we evaluated whether energy intake status (total energy intake and energy balance) modified the association between MQI and OC survival. During a median follow-up period of 38 (interquartile: 35-40) mo, 130 deaths occurred. The prediagnosis high MQI scores were associated with substantially improved survival among females with OC (HR Intake of high-quality macronutrients before diagnosis was associated with improved survival among females with OC, especially for those with energy imbalance.