Young Seok Kim

Pattern of practice for postoperative management of endometrial cancer in Korea: a survey by the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KGOG 2028-KROG 2104)

This study aimed to investigate the current status of postoperative management of uterine endometrial cancer (EC) in Korea. A mail survey was administered to members of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group and Korean Radiation Oncology Group. A total of 38 gynecologic cancer surgeons (GYNs) and 31 radiation oncologists (RO) in 43 institutions was responded. The questionnaire consisted of general questions for clinical decision and clinical case questions. The GYN and RO responses were compared using chi-square statistics. The 2 expert groups had similar responses for clinical decision based on the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-249 and Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Carcinoma-III trials in the early-stage EC. In contrast, the responses based on GOG-258 results differed, as GYNs most frequently opted for sequential chemotherapy (CTx) and radiotherapy (RT), while ROs preferred concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced stage (p<0.05). Based on the GOG-258, GYNs preferred CTx alone for adjuvant treatment of serous or clear cell adenocarcinoma histology, whereas ROs advocated for combined CTx and RT (sequential or concurrent). Among the clinical case questions, GYNs were more likely than ROs to choose CTx alone rather than the combination of CTx and RT (sequential or concurrent) as the answers to case questions representing patients with locally advanced stage or unfavorable histology (all p<0.05). The present study showed several different opinions of GYNs and ROs regarding adjuvant treatment for EC, particularly for adjuvant RT in advanced stage or unfavorable histology.

Postoperative conventional versus hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy in cervical cancer: a prospective multicenter randomized phase III trial (POHIM_P3 trial)

For patients with high-risk factors such as pelvic lymph node metastasis, positive surgical margins, or parametrial involvement, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with whole-pelvic radiotherapy significantly improves survival outcomes. Hypofractionated radiation therapy, which delivers higher radiation doses over fewer sessions, enhances tumor control but raises concerns about increased normal tissue toxicity. A recent Korean phase II study (POHIM-CCRT) evaluated the safety of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), delivering 40 Gy in 16 fractions with weekly cisplatin following radical surgery. The results showed minimal acute toxicity. Based on these findings, the present study was designed to assess the oncologic efficacy of hypofractionated CCRT compared to conventional treatment strategies in high-risk cervical cancer patients after radical surgery. The POHIM-P3 trial is a phase 3, randomized, multicenter study designed for women with cervical cancer requiring adjuvant CCRT after radical hysterectomy. Participants in the experimental arm receive hypofractionated IMRT to whole pelvis, delivering a total dose of 40 Gy in 16 fractions, and the control arm receive conventional radiotherapy with a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions in combination with weekly cisplatin. The primary endpoint of the study is the 3-year disease-free survival and the secondary endpoints included acute and late side-effects, local control rates, and overall survival rates. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06509724.

Impact of intracavitary brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcomes of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of brachytherapy (BT) technique (two-dimensional [2D] or three-dimensional image-guided [3D]) on outcomes of cervical cancer patients. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to April 16, 2019, for studies which evaluated the effect of 3D-BT compared to 2D-BT in cervical cancer. Endpoints included cumulative incidence of severe toxicity, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled in the meta-analysis using the random-effects model. Six studies of eight cohorts were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled HR regarding toxicity was evaluated in five cohorts in three studies, and the HR of 3D-BT compared to 2D-BT was 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.77). All six studies were included for the synthesis for LRRFS, and the pooled HR favors 3D-BT (0.61 [95% CI 0.40-0.93]). For PFS, three studies were included for analysis and 3D-BT was superior to 2D-BT (HR = 0.75 [95% CI 0.59-0.96]). Five studies were included for the pooled HR regarding OS, and pooled HR of 3D-BT compared to 2D-BT was 0.65 (95% CI 0.40-1.06). 3D-BT might reduce severe toxicity and improve LRRFS and PFS in patients with cervical cancer. 3D-BT should be considered for standard management of cervical cancer, and efforts for adopting this procedure in Korea should be pursued.

Significance of the number of high-risk factors in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of high-risk factors on the survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. From 2000 to 2014, medical records of 897 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB-IIA disease treated with surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 483 patients with high-risk factors, including pelvic lymph node metastasis, parametrial invasion, or resection margin involvement, were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 57 months (range, 6-205 months). For patients with single and multiple high-risk factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 80.4% and 65.7%, respectively (p < 0.001), and 5-year OS rates were 87.3% and 75.1%, respectively (p = 0.001). Distant metastasis was the most common pattern of recurrence (86.1%). Furthermore, distant metastasis-free survival significantly differed with the number of high-risk factors present (single 82.7% vs. multiple 68.8%, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, while parametrial invasion and resection margin involvement showed no association, the adenocarcinoma histology, pelvic lymph node metastasis, higher metastatic lymph node ratio, and multiple high-risk factors were independent prognosticators associated with poor DFS and OS. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer having multiple high-risk factors, adenocarcinoma histologic type, and pelvic lymph node metastasis accompanied by a higher lymph node ratio after surgery are more likely to have occult distant metastasis. Further, consolidation with systemic chemotherapy after adjuvant therapy might be considered to improve the survival outcome in this patient population.

Chemoradiotherapy is not superior to radiotherapy alone after radical surgery for cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factor

There is no consensus on whether giving adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is more effective than adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with early stage cervical cancer and intermediate-risk factor(s). The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival difference according to adjuvant treatment in the intermediate-risk group. From 2000 to 2014, the medical records of patients with stage IB-IIA cervical cancer and a history of radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection, followed by pelvic RT at a dose ≥40 Gy were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 316 patients with one or more intermediate-risk factor(s) and no high-risk factors were included. The criteria defined the intermediate-risk group as those patients with any of the following intermediate-risk factors: lymphovascular space involvement, over one-half stromal invasion, or tumor size ≥4 cm. The median follow-up duration was 70 months (range: 3-203 months). According to adjuvant treatment (adjuvant RT alone vs. adjuvant CCRT), the 5-year recurrence-free survival rates (90.8% vs. 88.9%, p=0.631) and 5-year overall survival rates (95.9% vs. 91.0%, p=0.287) did not show a significant difference in patients with any of the intermediate-risk factors. In multivariate analysis, a distinct survival difference according to adjuvant treatment was not found regardless of the number of risk factors. The present study showed that giving RT together with chemotherapy is not more effective than RT alone for stage IB-IIA cervical cancer patients with intermediate-risk factor(s). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01101451.

Comparison of Conventional and Hypofractionated IMRT in High-Risk Cervical Cancer Post-Radical Hysterectomy

Radical hysterectomy and radiation therapy are standard treatments for cervical cancer. However, there are no reported studies on the frequency of side effects and treatment outcomes when hypofractionated radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) are used during radiation therapy. Hypofractionated radiation therapy increases the daily dose and reduces the number of treatment sessions, which may increase the risk of side effects, but its safety has been confirmed in some cases of early cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. Additionally, applying IMRT, a technique designed to protect normal tissue, during concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown positive results in reducing the incidence of acute side effects. Investigators previously demonstrated that combining hypofractionated IMRT with chemotherapy for high-risk postoperative cervical cancer patients resulted in high survival rates and low toxicity in a phase 2 exploratory study. Base on this result, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional fractionated radiation therapy and hypofractionated radiation therapy.

Radiation Therapy With or Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Stage I-IIA Cervical Cancer Who Previously Underwent Surgery

This randomized phase III trial studies radiation therapy with chemotherapy to see how well they work compared to radiation therapy alone in treating patients with stage I-IIA cervical cancer who previously underwent surgery. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving radiation therapy together with chemotherapy is more effective than radiation therapy alone in treating patients with cervical cancer.