Yong-Man Kim

Oncogenic pathway landscape of ovarian cancer and correlation with clinical prognosis

We aimed to identify the main oncogenic pathway by histological type of ovarian cancer based on Next-generation sequencing (NGS) test and to determine the correlation with clinical prognosis. We conducted a retrospective review of 420 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent NGS testing at Asan Medical Center from June 1, 2017, to May 31, 2021. Identified mutations were categorized into seven oncogenic pathways that are most frequently associated with ovarian cancer. The average number of oncogenic pathways involved in each cancer patient was 1.76 (range, 0-6). TP53 mutation was the primary oncogenic pathway in patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) (92.8%) and carcinosarcoma (87.5%). MAP kinase signaling was the primary oncogenic pathway in low-grade serous carcinoma (58.3%) and mucinous carcinoma (54.5%). The involvement of more diverse oncogenic pathways has been identified in patients with endometrioid carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling and SWI/SNF family pathways were the most common in both groups. The involvement of the DNA damage response pathway showed an association with better progression free survival (PFS), but not with overall survival (OS) in patients with HGSC. On the other hand, the involvement of the RTK signaling family pathway showed an association with better OS despite no association with PFS in patients with HGSC. The clinical prognosis may be improved by implementing targeted treatment tailored to the patient's genetic profile through NGS. Additional research is needed to determine whether the involvement of the RTK signaling family pathway is indeed associated with better OS and to identify the underlying reasons for this association.

Current treatment strategies for ovarian cancer in the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT)

Ovarian cancer, notable for its severe prognosis among gynecologic cancers, has seen substantial progress in treatment approaches recently. Enhanced protocols in chemotherapy and the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for maintenance therapy have markedly improved outcomes for patients with specific genetic profiles, such as those positive for BRCA mutations or exhibiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Additionally, the method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration has emerged as a valuable alternative to traditional transvenous routes, showing promise for wider clinical adoption. The field of surgery has also evolved, with increasing exploration into the benefits and feasibility of laparoscopic methods over more invasive traditional surgeries, aiming for complete tumor removal but with reduced patient impact. The hereditary nature of ovarian cancer underscores the importance of genetic testing, which has become integral in tailoring treatment strategies, particularly in determining suitability for PARP inhibitors. The formation of the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) aims to optimize treatment across Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan. The ovarian cancer committee of EAGOT shared the current policies, focusing on 5 topics: 1) strategies for maintenance therapy after initial surgery and chemotherapy, 2) drug regimens for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence, 3) intraperitoneal chemotherapy, 4) laparoscopic surgery as an alternative to laparotomy, and 5) current status of genetic testing (BRCA, HRD, and panel tests) for ovarian cancer and its prospects. EAGOT's multi-national trials aim to harmonize these evolving treatment strategies, ensuring that the latest and most effective protocols are accessible across the region, thereby significantly impacting patient outcomes in East Asia.

Feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer with dense adhesion: a long-term result from a single institution

We investigated the feasibility and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with dense adhesions. Patients were divided into cases with and without dense adhesions in this retrospective study. Of the 95 eligible patients, 29 patients had dense adhesions. Mean age, proportion of staging procedure, distribution of histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis were different (p=0.003, 0.033, 0.011, and 0.011, respectively). The median follow-up period was 57.8 (0.4-230.0) months. There were no differences in the rates of recurrence (21.2% vs. 20.7%, p=1.000) or death (16.7% vs. 6.9%, p=0.332) between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the pattern of recurrence or in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment cancer antigen-125 >35 U/mL and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IC were significant factors of worse DFS and OS, while dense adhesion was not a prognostic factor for both DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.3-2.7; p=0.792) and OS (HR=0.2; 95% CI=0.1-1.8; p=0.142), nor were age, proportion of staging procedure, histologic type, and co-presence of endometriosis. Moreover, the distribution of those 2 significant prognostic factors was not different between the 2 groups. Dense adhesions were subgrouped into non-tumor and tumor associated dense adhesions for further analysis and the results were same. FSS is feasible and safe in EOC, regardless of the presence of dense adhesions.

Real-world experience of olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer

The primary objective of our study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer in daily practice. The secondary objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in such patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 patients who received olaparib maintenance treatment. Data on clinicopathological factors, oncological outcomes, and adverse events were obtained from medical records and analyzed. All patients had high-grade serous recurrent ovarian cancer with BRCA mutation and achieved complete or partial response to the most recent platinum-based chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median PFS was 23.7 months (95% confidence interval, 14.1-33.4); however, the median overall survival was not reached. In the log-rank test, the PFS was significantly longer for patients with most recent platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥ 12 months, complete response to the last platinum-based chemotherapy, and less than three lines of previous chemotherapy (p = 0.005, p = 0.016, and p = 0.023, respectively). Most hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events were of grade 1 or 2, and the common adverse events were mostly related to myelosuppression. Olaparib maintenance treatment in BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer is effective and safe in clinical practice. Most recent PFI, response to the last platinum-based chemotherapy, and the number of previous chemotherapy lines were associated with PFS in patients with BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of surgically treated extramammary Paget’s disease of the vulva

Extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) of the vulva is a rare disease which predominantly presents in postmenopausal Caucasian women. As yet, no studies on Asian female patients with EMPD have been performed. This study aimed to identify the clinical features of patients with vulvar EMPD in Korea, and to evaluate the risk factors of recurrence and postoperative complications in surgically treated EMPD. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients with vulvar EMPD who underwent wide local excision or radical vulvectomy. The clinical data and surgical and oncological outcomes following surgery were extracted from medical records and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses for predicting recurrence and postoperative complications were performed. 21.3% of patients had complications after surgery, and wound dehiscence was the most common. 14.9% of patients experienced recurrence, and the median interval to recurrence from initial treatment was 69 (range 33-169) months. Vulvar lesions larger than 40 mm was the independent risk factor of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]=7.259; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.545-34.100; p=0.012). Surgical margin status was not associated with recurrence in surgically treated vulvar EMPD patients (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.16-4.19; p=1.000). Positive surgical margin is a frequent finding in the patients with vulvar EMPD, but disease recurrence is not related with surgical margin status. Since EMPD is a slow growing tumor, a surveillance period longer than 5 years is required.

East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT): founding history and future perspective

Racial and regional differences exist in morbidity, histology, drug response, toxicity, and prognosis of gynecologic cancer. However, most large-scale phase III studies have been conducted in Western countries, and these data on Asians, who account for more than half of the world's population, are limited. To build a global clinical trial network in Asia, four clinical trial groups with high expertise and international competitiveness in East Asia, namely the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Japan, the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group in Korea, the Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group in Taiwan, and the Chinese Gynecologic Cancer Society in the People's Republic of China, established a new group called the East Asia Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) on November 19, 2021. It includes four committees: the Cervical Cancer Committee, Uterine Corpus Cancer Committee, Ovarian Cancer Committee, and Translational Research Committee. The purpose of EAGOT is to conduct international clinical trials in an effort to provide the best treatments for Asian women affected by gynecologic cancer. Discussions on new collaborative clinical trials have already begun. The first Annual EAGOT Meeting was held on May 25-27, 2023 in Niigata, Japan. EAGOT, the largest healthcare/investigational innovation network in Asia in the area of gynecologic cancers, will become a platform for establishing standards of care and lead to guidelines for Asian women suffering from gynecologic cancer. The harmonization of regulatory/investigator-initiated clinical trials, simultaneous approval of unapproved drugs in the four countries under a common protocol, and expansion of indications will improve the prognosis of gynecologic cancers in Asia in the near future.

Cediranib and Olaparib Combination Compared With Cediranib or Olaparib Alone, or Chemotherapy in Platinum-Resistant or Primary Platinum-Refractory Ovarian Cancer: NRG-GY005

PURPOSE We assessed the efficacy of cediranib, olaparib, and cediranib/olaparib compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy (SOC) in platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory epithelial ovarian cancer (PROC). PATIENTS AND METHODS NRG-GY005 is an open-label, four-arm, phase II/III superiority trial enrolling patients with high-grade serous/endometrioid PROC and one to three previous therapies. Key exclusion criteria included previous receipt of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor or receipt of antiangiogenic therapy in the recurrent setting. Treatment arms (SOC [once weekly paclitaxel, topotecan, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin], cediranib, olaparib, or cediranib/olaparib) were equally randomized. A preplanned interim futility analysis on the basis of progression-free survival (PFS) selected treatment arms to advance to phase III. PFS and overall survival (OS) were phase III coprimary end points, with hierarchical testing of PFS followed by OS to preserve type 1 error control, designed to have 90% power for a 0.625 PFS hazard ratio (HR). OS was tested after PFS in the multiple hierarchical testing procedure. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS Five hundred sixty-two eligible patients were enrolled for phase II/III. Three arms met PFS criteria to carry forward to phase III (SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib). Median PFS was 3.4, 5.2, and 4 months with SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively, with a median follow-up duration of 42.2 months. PFS HR estimates for cediranib/olaparib and cediranib ( v SOC) were 0.796 (98.3% CI, 0.597 to 1.060) and 0.972 (98.3% CI, 0.726 to 1.300), respectively. Median OS was 13.6, 12.8, and 10.5 months, and of 443 patients with measurable disease, ORR was 8.6%, 24.7%, and 13.1% for SOC, cediranib/olaparib, and cediranib, respectively. No new safety signals were identified. In patients receiving cediranib/olaparib, no statistically significant difference was observed on the NFOSI-DRS-P subscale compared with SOC (98.3% CI, –1.3 to 1.5, P = .8725). CONCLUSION The cediranib-containing arms demonstrated clinical activity on the basis of PFS but were not superior compared with SOC.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in East Asian participants with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: results from KEYNOTE-826 final analysis

In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-826 study (NCT03635567), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in participants with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. We report an exploratory analysis of outcomes for participants enrolled in East Asia based on the final analysis of KEYNOTE-826. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles. All participants received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin or carboplatin for up to 6 cycles, and optionally received bevacizumab at the investigator's discretion. PFS and OS were dual primary endpoints. Ninety-seven participants from East Asia were enrolled in the intention-to-treat population. At data cutoff (October 3, 2022), in the intention-to-treat population, median PFS in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and placebo plus chemotherapy groups was 18.0 and 10.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]=0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.23-0.77); median OS was not reached and 20.4 months, respectively (HR=0.53; 95% CI=0.28-0.99). In the programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 population, median PFS was 29.3 and 10.9 months, respectively (HR=0.36; 95% CI=0.19-0.68); median OS was not reached and 17.4 months, respectively (HR=0.43; 95% CI=0.22-0.86). The most common adverse events with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy were alopecia (75% vs. 68%) and anemia (67% vs. 65%). These data support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for the treatment of persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in East Asian patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635567.

Analysis of East Asia subgroup in Study 309/KEYNOTE-775: lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus treatment of physician’s choice chemotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer

In the global phase 3 Study 309/KEYNOTE-775 (NCT03517449) at the first interim analysis, lenvatinib+pembrolizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) versus treatment of physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC) in patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This exploratory analysis evaluated outcomes in patients enrolled in East Asia at the time of prespecified final analysis. Women ≥18 years with histologically confirmed advanced, recurrent, or metastatic EC with progressive disease after 1 platinum-based chemotherapy (2 if 1 given in neoadjuvant/adjuvant setting) were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks (≤35 cycles) or TPC (doxorubicin or paclitaxel). Primary endpoints were PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and OS. No alpha was assigned for this subgroup analysis. Among 155 East Asian patients (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab, n=77; TPC, n=78), median follow-up time (data cutoff: March 1, 2022) was 34.3 (range, 25.1-43.0) months. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PFS (lenvatinib+pembrolizumab vs. TPC) were 0.74 (0.49-1.10) and 0.64 (0.44-0.94) in the mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and all-comer populations, respectively. HRs (95% CI) for OS were 0.68 (0.45-1.02) and 0.61 (0.41-0.90), respectively. ORRs were 36% with lenvatinib+pembrolizumab and 22% with TPC (pMMR) and 39% and 21%, respectively (all-comers). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% and 96% (grade 3-5, 74% and 72%), respectively. Lenvatinib+pembrolizumab provided clinically meaningful benefit with manageable safety compared with TPC, supporting its use in East Asian patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent EC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03517449.

Testing the Combination of Cediranib and Olaparib in Comparison to Each Drug Alone or Other Chemotherapy in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

This randomized phase II/III trial studies how well cediranib maleate and olaparib work when given together or separately, and compares them to standard chemotherapy in treating patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that has returned (recurrent) after receiving chemotherapy with drugs that contain platinum (platinum-resistant) or continued to grow while being treated with platinum-based chemotherapy drugs (platinum-refractory). Cediranib maleate and olaparib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking enzymes needed for cell growth. Chemotherapy drugs work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. It is not yet known whether giving cediranib maleate and olaparib together may cause more damage to cancer cells when compared to either drug alone or standard chemotherapy.