Yoichi Aoki

Indocyanine green-guided sentinel lymph node mapping during laparoscopic surgery with vaginal cuff closure but no uterine manipulator for cervical cancer

Lymph node metastasis is a critical prognostic factor in cervical cancer. Considering the potential complications of lymphadenectomy and desirability of avoiding systemic lymphadenectomy, accurate intraoperative prediction of the existence of lymph node metastasis is important in patients undergoing surgery for cervical cancer. We evaluated the feasibility and value of indocyanine green (ICG) use for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping during laparoscopic surgery performed for cervical cancer. This single-center cohort study included 77 patients undergoing a new laparoscopic radical surgery method with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. The surgery, performed without using a uterine manipulator, included creation of a vaginal cuff. Bilateral ICG-guided SLN mapping and rapid histopathological examination were performed, and results were analyzed in relation to final histopathologic diagnoses. The SLN pelvic side-specific detection rate was 93.5%, sensitivity (SLN-positive cases/SLN-detected pelvic lymph node-positive cases) was 100%, intraoperative negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.8%, and final pathological NPV was 100%. The detection rate was significantly lower for tumors ≥ 2 cm in diameter than for tumors < 2 cm in diameter. Micrometastases were missed by intraoperative examination in 3 cases. The high NPV suggests the feasibility and usefulness of ICG-based SLN mapping plus rapid intraoperative examination for identification of metastatic SLNs. Use of ICG-based mapping for intraoperative identification of SLNs in patients undergoing this new laparoscopic surgery method for early-stage cervical cancer was particularly effective for tumors < 2 cm in diameter. However, incorporating a search for micrometastases into rapid intraoperative histopathologic examination may be necessary.

Clinical Management of Atypical Endometrial Cells of Undetermined Significance Followed by Negative Cytology

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Introduction:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; In Japan, endometrial cytology is widely performed to evaluate the status of the endometrium in women with suspected endometrial cancer. A new classification system for endometrial cytology has recently been used: the Yokohama system, based on a descriptive reporting format. This study aimed to clarify the triage for patients with atypical endometrial cells of undetermined significance (ATEC-US) when followed by negative endometrial cytology. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; We enrolled patients diagnosed with ATEC-US at the Cancer Institute Hospital between January 2016 and December 2017, based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) ATEC-US diagnosed by office endometrial cytology, with or without office endometrial biopsy; (2) follow-up endometrial cytology was performed 3–6 months after initial sampling, with a negative result for malignancy; and (3) no prior history of conservative treatment with progestin for endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (ATEC-A). Among eligible patients, we analyzed those later diagnosed by endometrial biopsy with ATEC-A or carcinoma. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Among 187 patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Forty-two patients (64.6%) were observed for more than 24 months. Two patients (3.1%) developed ATEC-A during a median observation time of 26.5 months; the times to diagnosis were 32 months and 22 months. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Discussion/Conclusion:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; No patient developed ATEC-A or worse within 1 year. For patients with ATEC-US, if negative cytology is obtained at the next examination, a close follow-up is not necessary.

Comparison of older and younger patients with ovarian cancer: A post hoc study (JGOG3016‐A3) of the treatment strength and prognostic outcomes of conventional or dose‐dense chemotherapy

AbstractAimTo evaluate changes of treatment strength and its impact on prognosis in older patients with ovarian cancer.MethodsWe compared relative dose intensity (RDI) as a representative of treatment strength, prognosis, and other features between older (≥65 years) and younger patients (&lt;65 years) retrospectively. Seventy‐seven older patients of 301 who received dose‐dense‐paclitaxel‐carboplatin (dTC) and 93 older patients of 304 who received conventional‐paclitaxel‐carboplatin (cTC) from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 3016 clinical trial were analyzed.ResultsThe RDI of older patients was lower than that of younger patients in cTC (87.4% vs. 90.8%, p = 0.009) but not in dTC (79.0% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.205). In both regimens, older patients had worse overall survival than younger patients: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25–2.59; p = 0.001 for dTC, and HR = 1.59; 95% CI: 1.15–2.19; p = 0.04 for cTC. However, the RDI was not determined as a prognostic factor statistically. The prognostic factors identified by multivariate analysis for both regimens were clinical stage and residual disease; for dTC were age, performance status, and serum albumin; and for cTC was white blood cell count. There was no difference in neutropenia observed between age groups in either regimen.ConclusionsThe RDI of older patients varies according to the administered schedule and is not always lower than that of younger patients. Older patients with comparable treatment strength to younger patients in the dTC group did not accomplish the same level of prognosis as younger patients. Other biologic factors attributable to aging may affect prognosis.

Nivolumab Versus Gemcitabine or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Open-Label, Randomized Trial in Japan (NINJA)

PURPOSE This phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label study investigated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab versus chemotherapy (gemcitabine [GEM] or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD]) in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible patients had platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, received ≤ 1 regimen after diagnosis of resistance, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≤ 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks [as one cycle]) or chemotherapy (GEM 1000 mg/m2 for 30 minutes [once on days 1, 8, and 15] followed by a week's rest [as one cycle], or PLD 50 mg/m2 once every 4 weeks [as one cycle]). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Patients (n = 316) were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 157) or GEM or PLD (n = 159) between October 2015 and December 2017. Median OS was 10.1 (95% CI, 8.3 to 14.1) and 12.1 (95% CI, 9.3 to 15.3) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.3; P = .808). Median PFS was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.2) and 3.8 (95% CI, 3.6 to 4.2) months with nivolumab and GEM or PLD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.9; P = .002). There was no statistical difference in overall response rate between groups (7.6% v 13.2%; odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2 to 1.3; P = .191). Median duration of response was numerically longer with nivolumab than GEM or PLD (18.7 v 7.4 months). Fewer treatment-related adverse events were observed with nivolumab versus GEM or PLD (61.5% v 98.1%), with no additional or new safety risks. CONCLUSION Although well-tolerated, nivolumab did not improve OS and showed worse PFS compared with GEM or PLD in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Should indications for laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) exclude patients with sciatica?

Previously, indications for laterally extended endopelvic resection (LEER) have excluded patients with sciatica because R0 resection has not been deemed possible [1]. Because laparoscopy optimizes visualization and thus provides for meticulous dissection, we hypothesized that R0 resection can be achieved by means of laparoscopic LEER in patients with sciatica. This video article aimed to clarify the technical feasibility of laparoscopic LEER performed for laterally recurrent previously irradiated cervical cancer with concomitant sciatica. We investigated technical feasibility of laparoscopic LEER performed as a salvage therapy following abdominal radical hysterectomy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a patient suffering laterally recurrent cervical carcinoma with concomitant sciatica. The recurrent tumor involved the right external and internal iliac artery and vein, ileocecum, rectosigmoid colon, right ureter, right obturator nerve, and right sciatic nerve, with a resulting fistula between the tumor and the rectosigmoid colon, and severe sciatica. Resection of all these structures was essential for achievement of R0 status, and such resection means concomitant femoral bypass with prosthetic graft interposition and gastrointestinal/urinary tract resection. Laparoscopic LEER with femoral-femoral artery bypass could be conducted without any postoperative complications. Pathological R0 resection could be achieved, and local recurrence could have been controlled. However, the patient died from liver and lung metastasis at 1 year after this resection surgery. Laparoscopic LEER for a laterally recurrent previously irradiated cervical cancer with concomitant sciatica was technically feasible, however, further study involving a greater number of patients and longer follow-up period is warranted to determine the stringent indications.

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review

Radical hysterectomy is a standard surgery to treat early-stage uterine cervical cancer. The Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial has shown that patients receiving minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have a poorer prognosis than those receiving open radical hysterectomy; however, the reason for this remains unclear. The LACC trial had 2 concerns: the learning curve and the procedural effects. Appropriate management of the learning curve effect, including surgeons' skills, is required to correctly interpret the result of surgical randomized controlled trials. Whether the LACC trial managed the learning curve effect remains controversial, based on the surgeons' inclusion criteria and the distribution of institutions with recurrent cases. An appropriate surgical procedure is also needed, and avoiding intraoperative cancer cell spillage plays an important role during cancer surgery. Cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive surgery to treat cervical cancer is caused by several factors, including 1) exposure of tumor, 2) the use of a uterine manipulator, and 3) direct handling of the uterine cervix. Unfortunately, these issues were not addressed by the LACC trial. We evaluated the results of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy while avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer. Our findings show that avoiding cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy may ensure an equivalent oncologic outcome, comparable to that of open radical hysterectomy. Therefore, evaluating the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage during minimally invasive surgery with a better control of the learning curve and procedural effects is needed.

Influence of COVID‐19 on the clinical characteristics of patients with uterine cervical cancer in Japan: A single‐center retrospective study

AbstractAimThis study investigated the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on the clinical characteristics and interregional movement of patients with uterine cervical cancer.MethodsThis study included 1189 patients who underwent treatment for cervical cancer, including cervical intraepithelial neoplasm and adenocarcinoma in situ, at our hospital in Tokyo, Japan, in 2017–2018 and in 2021, before and after the pandemic, respectively. The patients' clinical information was compared during both periods. The clinical stage was unified using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2008 staging.ResultsThe number of patients treated for cervical cancer was 355, 420, and 414 in 2017, 2018, and 2021, respectively. The percentage of invasive carcinomas significantly increased from 158 (44.5%) and 196 (46.7%) to 219 (52.9%) (p = 0.049). In all periods, no significant differences were observed in median age, histological type, and treatment. The proportions of FIGO Stage IA1 were significantly elevated from 3.9% and 3.8% to 11.4% (p &lt; 0.001). The percentage of patients from prefectures other than Tokyo significantly increased from 34.9% to 40.8% (p = 0.049). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with invasive carcinoma in private clinics increased from 28.0% to 37.9% (p = 0.014).ConclusionsThe number of patients with invasive carcinoma and the percentage of patients with invasive carcinoma referred from private clinics increased, indicating that the COVID‐19 pandemic influenced patients to delay consultations. Furthermore, the surge in patients from other prefectures indicates that medical resources were more limited in rural areas, another impact of COVID‐19.

Ovarian surveillance including endometrial cytology for patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer before risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy: A retrospective analysis

AbstractAimOvarian surveillance in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who do not undergo risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy has been controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the clinical features of ovarian surveillance at our institution using a technique that combines serum cancer antigen 125 measurements, transvaginal ultrasonography, and uterine endometrial cytology.MethodsWe retrospectively examined 65 women, who had not undergone risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy diagnosed with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2021 at our hospital. Clinical information was obtained and analyzed through a chart review. The details of the treatment course were reviewed for patients who had developed ovarian cancer.ResultsOverall, 5 of the 65 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer based on abnormal findings during periodic surveillance. All patients who developed ovarian cancer were asymptomatic, even if the cancer was at an advanced stage. Two of the 65 patients had endometrial cytology abnormalities, both of whom had ovarian cancer. All patients who developed ovarian cancer underwent primary debulking surgery, and complete gross resection was achieved. None of the patients experienced ovarian cancer recurrence.ConclusionsThe ovarian surveillance strategy at our institution for women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who do not undergo risk‐reducing salpingo‐oophorectomy can identify asymptomatic ovarian cancer and contribute to achieving complete gross resection during primary surgery. Ovarian surveillance may contribute to a reduction in ovarian cancer mortality.

The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in vulnerable patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer: a single institution experience

Effective management with second-line therapy with the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab regimen for patients with advanced endometrial cancer is necessary. This retrospective study enrolled patients with endometrial cancer treated with the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab regimen. We evaluated progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety for patients non-eligible for the KEYNOTE775 trial, aged ≥65 years, or with ECOG performance status 1-2. Forty-five patients were analyzed: 21 (47%) were aged ˃ 65 years, 16 (36%) had performance status 1-2, and 15 (33%) were non-eligible for KEYNOTE775 trial participation. Overall, the median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-12.4), and the median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI 9.4-NA). Median PFS was significantly shorter in patients not eligible for KEYNOTE775 participation and with performance status 1-2. The median OS was significantly shorter in patients with performance status 1-2. Grade ˃3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 78% of patients who received the lenvatinib + pembrolizumab regimen. AEs resulted in lenvatinib dose reductions in 35 patients (78%) and lenvatinib and pembrolizumab discontinuation in 3 (7%) and 5 (11%), respectively. The median time to the first lenvatinib dose reduction was 1.5 (0.92-2.3) months in all patients and was significantly shorter in patients aged >65 years. The current regimen has favorable efficacy and manageable safety with appropriate dose reduction of lenvatinib in the real world. However, the efficacy may be inferior in patients with performance status 1 or 2, heavily treated patients, and those with organ dysfunction. The current treatment status should reflect real-world data relative to the medical environment and management.