Yohan Kerbage

Impact of lymph node staging on survival in presumed early-stage ovarian cancer: a multicentric retrospective study

This study aimed to assess the impact of comprehensive staging on survival outcomes in this population. Patients who underwent surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer in one of the 14 Francogyn cancer centers between 2000 and 2020 were included in the study. The primary analysis evaluated the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Lymph node count was analyzed as a continuous variable, and its association with survival, considered as a continuous outcome was assessed using linear regression (secondary analysis). Survival was compared using the log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox model. A total of 467 patients with presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer were included, of which 198 underwent complete lymphadenectomy and 266 did not. No significant association was found between lymph node staging and survival in the primary analysis, possibly due to limited statistical power and a selection bias, as patients without lymphadenectomy had more favorable disease profiles (p=0.600 and p=0.700, respectively). Complete lymphadenectomy was associated with a significantly higher risk of complications (34.5% vs. 14%, p<0.001). In secondary analysis, the number of para-aortic lymph nodes harvested was identified as an independent predictor of both overall survival and recurrence-free survival (p=0.007 and p=0.002, respectively). Histological characteristics and adjuvant chemotherapy also showed a significant correlation with improved survival outcomes. Extensive para-aortic lymphadenectomy in early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with better overall and recurrence-free survival but comes with an increased risk of complications.

Fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology: evaluating knowledge, practices, and barriers among French healthcare providers

To assess the knowledge, practices, and referral patterns of health care professionals and fertility preservation specialists regarding fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology in France. In this cross sectional study, an electronic questionnaire was distributed between June 2023 and January 2024 to health care professionals in metropolitan and overseas territories. It included sections on demographics, fertility preservation practices, and technical knowledge, with tailored sections for physicians who are specialists and non-specialists in reproductive medicine. Sixty-four professionals participated (mean experience: 12 years); 65.6% (42/64) were gynecologic surgeons, and 18.8% (12/64) were specialists in reproductive medicine. Among non-specialists (52/64), 82.7% (43/52) routinely discussed fertility with patients of childbearing age, and 94.2% (49/52) had referred patients for fertility preservation. The mean knowledge score was 1.4/6. Only 23.1% (12/52) reported having written materials for patients, and 65.4% (34/52) indicated that no fertility specialist was present at multidisciplinary meetings. All reproductive medicine specialists (n = 12) reported access to oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, but 83.3% (10/12) believed patients were under-referred. They emphasized the need for systematic discussions of fertility preservation in multidisciplinary settings and highlighted risks associated with ovarian stimulation and tissue reimplantation. The upper age limit for oocyte cryopreservation was generally under 40 years. Pregnancy outcomes following fertility preservation were limited, primarily in cases of borderline ovarian tumors. Fertility preservation is recognized as a critical component of gynecologic oncology care, but significant gaps remain in knowledge, referrals, and integration into multidisciplinary care. Strengthening collaboration between oncology and fertility teams, standardizing care pathways, and enhancing education for health care providers are essential steps to improving access and outcomes for patients.

Impact of age on tumor size in vulvar cancer: A multicenter study by the Francogyn group

Vulvar cancer is a rare pathology affecting mainly elderly women. This study aims to evaluate the impact of age on tumor size in vulvar cancer. This was a multicenter retrospective observational study carried out between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2020, in patients operated on for vulvar cancer. Univariate analysis was performed according to patients' age ≥ or <65 years. Factors associated with tumor size found to be significant according to age were then included in a multiple linear regression model. Of the 382 patients included, there were 133 patients aged <65 years and 249 ≥ 65 years. Radical total vulvectomy surgeries were more frequently performed in women ≥65 years (n = 72 (28.9 %) versus n = 20 (15 %); p = 0.004). The median histological tumor size and interquartile range was 20 mm [13-29] in the <65 years and 30 mm [15-42] in patients ≥65 years (p = 0.001). Multiple linear regression showed that age ≥65 years had a regression coefficient of 7.15 95 % CI [2.32; 11.99] (p = 0.004), constituting a risk factor for larger histological tumour size. Patients aged ≥65 years old had a higher early complication rate (n = 150 (62 %) versus n = 56 (42.7 %), p = 0.001). They also had a greater risk of recurrence (HR = 1.89 (95%CI (1.24-2.89)), p = 0.003) with a worse overall survival (HR = 5.64 (95%CI (1.70-18.68)), p = 0.005). Age is a risk factor for larger tumor size, leading to more radical surgery and a greater risk of complications in already fragile patients, with a greater risk of recurrence and an impact on overall survival.

First external validity study of the Fagotti score in ovarian cancer

Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer is mostly discovered at the stage of peritoneal carcinosis. Complete cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival. The Fagotti score is a predictive score of resectability based on peritoneal laparoscopic exploratory. Our aim was to study the inter-observer concordance in an external validation of the Fagotti score. An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted using the Francogyn research network. The primary outcome was inter-observer concordance of the Fagotti score. 15 patients in which an ovarian mass was discovered were included. For each patient, the first exploratory laparoscopy before any treatment/chemotherapy was recorded. This bank of 15 videos was subject to blind review accompanied by a Fagotti score rating by 11 gynecological surgeons specializing in oncology. A total of 165 blind reviews were performed. Inter-observer concordance was very good for the Fagotti score with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.83 [95% CI 0.71; 0.93]. Inter-observer concordance for the adjusted Fagotti score, which accounts for unexplorable areas with extensive carcinomatosis, resulted in an ICC of 0.64 [95% CI 0.46; 0.82]. According to the reviewers, the three least explorable parameters were mesentery involvement, stomach infiltration and liver damage. The ICC of the explorable Fagotti score, i.e. score with deletion of the parameters most often unexplored by laparoscopy, was 0.86 [0.75–0.94]. This study confirms the reproducibility of the Fagotti score during first assessment laparoscopies in cases of advanced ovarian cancer. The explorable Fagotti score has an equivalent or better inter-observer concordance than the Fagotti score.