Investigator

Yeh Wang

Johns Hopkins University

YWYeh Wang
Papers(3)
Spatial Transcriptomi…Aneuploidy Landscape …Integrated Spatial An…
Collaborators(10)
Ie-Ming ShihTricia A. NumanTian-Li WangBrant G. WangYen-Wei ChienChristopher DouvilleLeslie CopeM. Herman ChuiNickolas PapadopoulosAndre Pinto
Institutions(6)
Johns Hopkins Univers…Roswell Park Comprehe…Baylor St. Luke's Med…Unknown InstitutionMemorial Sloan Ketter…University of Miami

Papers

Spatial Transcriptomic Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Precursors Reveals Reactivation of IGFBP2 during Pathogenesis

Abstract Elucidating the earliest pathogenic steps in cancer development is fundamental to improving its early detection and prevention. Ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), a highly aggressive cancer, mostly originates from the fallopian tube epithelium through a precursor stage, serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC). In this study, we performed spatial transcriptomic analysis to compare STICs, carcinoma, and their matched normal fallopian tube epithelium. Several differentially expressed genes in STICs and carcinomas were involved in cancer metabolism and detected in a larger independent transcriptomic dataset of ovarian HGSCs. Among these, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-2 (IGFBP2) was found to undergo DNA hypomethylation and to be increased at the protein level in STICs. Pyrosequencing revealed an association of IGFBP2 expression with the methylation state of its proximal enhancer, and 5-azacytidine treatment increased IGFBP2 expression. In postmenopausal fallopian tubes, where most STICs are detected, IGFBP2 immunoreactivity was detected in all 38 proliferatively active STICs but was undetectable in morphologically normal tubal epithelia, including those with TP53 mutations. In premenopausal fallopian tubes, IGFBP2 expression was limited to the secretory epithelium at the proliferative phase, and estradiol treatment increased IGFBP2 expression levels. IGFBP2 knockdown suppressed the growth of IGFBP2-expressing tubal epithelial cells via inactivation of the AKT pathway. Taken together, demethylation of the proximal enhancer of IGFBP2 drives tumor development by maintaining the increased IGFBP2 required for proliferation in an otherwise estrogen-deprived, proliferation-quiescent, and postmenopausal tubal microenvironment. Significance: Molecular studies of the earliest precursor lesions of ovarian cancer reveal a role of IGFBP2 in propelling tumor initiation, providing new insights into ovarian cancer development.

Aneuploidy Landscape in Precursors of Ovarian Cancer

Abstract Purpose: Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is now recognized as the main precursor of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Other potential tubal lesions include p53 signatures and tubal intraepithelial lesions. We aimed to investigate the extent and pattern of aneuploidy in these epithelial lesions and HGSC to define the features that characterize stages of tumor initiation and progression. Experimental Design: We applied RealSeqS to compare genome-wide aneuploidy patterns among the precursors, HGSC (cases, n = 85), and histologically unremarkable fallopian tube epithelium (HU-FTE; control, n = 65). On the basis of a discovery set (n = 67), we developed an aneuploidy-based algorithm, REAL-FAST (Repetitive Element AneupLoidy Sequencing Fallopian Tube Aneuploidy in STIC), to correlate the molecular data with pathology diagnoses. We validated the result in an independent validation set (n = 83) to determine its performance. We correlated the molecularly defined precursor subgroups with proliferative activity and histology. Results: We found that nearly all p53 signatures lost the entire Chr17, offering a “two-hit” mechanism involving both TP53 and BRCA1 in BRCA1 germline mutation carriers. Proliferatively active STICs harbor gains of 19q12 (CCNE1), 19q13.2, 8q24 (MYC), or 8q arm, whereas proliferatively dormant STICs show 22q loss. REAL-FAST classified HU-FTE and STICs into 5 clusters and identified a STIC subgroup harboring unique aneuploidy that is associated with increased proliferation and discohesive growth. On the basis of a validation set, REAL-FAST showed 95.8% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity in detecting STIC/HGSC. Conclusions: Morphologically similar STICs are molecularly distinct. The REAL-FAST assay identifies a potentially “aggressive” STIC subgroup harboring unique DNA aneuploidy that is associated with increased cellular proliferation and discohesive growth. REAL-FAST offers a highly reproducible adjunct technique to assist the diagnosis of STIC lesions.

Integrated Spatial Analysis Reveals the Molecular Landscape of Ovarian Precancerous Lesions

Abstract Studying precancerous lesions is essential for improving early detection and prevention, particularly in aggressive cancers such as ovarian carcinoma. In this study, we conducted integrated and spatial analyses of transcriptomes, aneuploidy, and clinicopathologic features in 166 ovarian precancerous lesions. Four precancerous transcriptomic subtypes were identified: proliferative, immunoreactive, dormant, and mixed. These subtypes varied in their frequency of germline BRCA1/2 mutations, aneuploidy, CCNE1/MYC amplification, proliferative activity, immunoregulatory gene expression, and histologic features. Notably, the immunoreactive subtype upregulated immunoregulatory genes, exhibited chronic inflammation, and was enriched in cases with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and deletions of chromosomes 17 (harboring TP53 and BRCA1) and 13 (harboring BRCA2), leading to a double “two-hit” involving TP53 and BRCA1/2. Tumor invasion was associated with the activation of interferon response pathways, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and extracellular matrix remodeling. In summary, these results elucidate the earliest molecular landscape of ovarian precancerous lesions, serving as the foundation for future risk stratification to identify aggressive precancerous lesions. Significance: Integrated spatial multiomics analysis of ovarian precancerous lesions reveals molecular subtypes and mechanisms underlying tumor initiation, offering a foundation for future risk stratification and prevention. See related commentary by Soong et al. p. 1537

3Papers
21Collaborators