Ye Yang

Retrospective analysis of the 18F-FDG PET/CT cutoff value for metabolic parameters was performed as a prediction model to evaluate risk factors for endometrial cancer

Abstract Purpose The study retrospectively analyzed the accuracy and predictive ability of preoperative integrated whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT for the assessment of high-risk factors in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). Materials and methods A total of 205 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative PET/CT at Shanghai General Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated and last follow-up was June 2023. Our study evaluated the ability and optimal cutoff values of three metabolic and volumetric parameters—standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)—to predict deep myometrial invasion (DMI), endocervical stroma invasion (ESI) and lymph node metastases (LNM) in endometrial cancer. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT were used to assess the diagnostic performance for the prediction. Results Our study demonstrated a significant relationship between SUVmax (11.29, 17.38, 9.47), SUVmean (5.20, 6.12, 4.49), MTV (38.15, 36.28, 33.79 ml), and TLG (199.30, 225.10, 156.40 g) on PET/CT and histologically confirmed DMI, ESI and LNM in endometrial carcinoma (EC), with sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 100%/100%/100%, 96.53%/98.89%/87.14%, 97.56%/99.02%/91.22%, 92.42%/92.85%/78.31%, and 100%/100%/100%, respectively. Our study showed a risk model based on optimal cutoff values for MTV and TLG of 19.6 ml/126.3 g, 20.54 ml/84.80 g and 24 ml/49.83 g to preoperatively predict DMI, ESI, and LNM, respectively, in endometrial carcinoma. The 4-year OS (HR) for Stage IA, IB, II, III and IV according to 2009 FIGO was 98.00% (0.22), 95.20% (0.04), 83.90% (0.18), 90.50% (0.09) and 60% (0.51). Accordingly, estimated 4-year DFS (HR) for the stage IA-III was 98% (0.02), 95.20% (0.05), 76.90% (0.27) and 76.30% (0.35), all the patients in stage IV occurred recurrence and progression. Conclusion The present study showed patients with MTV > = 19.6 ml of MI and PET- positive LN with MTV cutoff > = 24 ml tended to predict poor OS and PFS in endometrial carcinoma. The cutoff of MTV and TLG in PET/CT assessment could be an independent prognostic factors to predict aggressive forms of EC. Graphic Abstract

Molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer: Implications for adjuvant treatment strategies

AbstractBackgroundWhen determining adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer, the decision typically relies on factors such as cancer stage, histologic grade, subtype, and a few histopathologic markers. The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer, which can provide more accurate prognostic information and guide personalized treatment plans.ObjectiveTo summarize the expression and molecular basis of the main biomarkers of endometrial cancer.Search StrategyPubMed was searched from January 2000 to March 2023.Selection CriteriaStudies evaluating molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and implications for adjuvant treatment strategies.Data Collection and AnalysisThree authors independently performed a comprehensive literature search, collected and extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies.Main ResultsWe summarized the molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer, including mismatch repair deficient, high microsatellite instability, polymerase epsilon (POLE) exonuclease domain mutated, TP53 gene mutation, and non‐specific molecular spectrum. We also summarized planned and ongoing clinical trials and common therapy methods in endometrial cancer. POLE mutated endometrial cancer consistently exhibits favorable patient outcomes, regardless of adjuvant therapy. Genomic similarities between p53 abnormality endometrial cancer and high‐grade serous ovarian cancer suggested possible overlapping treatment strategies. High levels of immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed cell death 1 and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 can counterbalance mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer immune phenotype. Hormonal treatment is an appealing option for high‐risk non‐specific molecular spectrum endometrial cancers, which are typically endometrioid and hormone receptor positive. Combining clinical and pathologic characteristics to guide treatment decisions for patients, including concurrent radiochemotherapy, chemotherapy, inhibitor therapy, endocrine therapy, and immunotherapy, might improve the management of endometrial cancer and provide more effective treatment options for patients.ConclusionsWe have characterized the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer and discuss their value in terms of a patient‐tailored therapy in order to prevent significant under‐ or overtreatment.