Investigator

Yazhuo Wang

Hebei General Hospital

YWYazhuo Wang
Papers(2)
Identification of <sc…Association of <scp>B…
Collaborators(2)
Na LiJing Zhao
Institutions(3)
Hebei General HospitalPeter MacCallum Cance…Hunan Provincial Mate…

Papers

Association of BRCA1/2 mutations with prognosis and surgical cytoreduction outcomes in ovarian cancer patients: An updated meta‐analysis

AbstractAimThis meta‐analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of BRCA mutations on survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients and assess whether the BRCA status was an independent predictor of complete cytoreduction.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for studies that evaluated the associations among BRCA mutations, ovarian cancer survival and surgical cytoreduction before August 2021 based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.ResultsWe identified 61 articles that compared the clinical features, survival outcomes, and optimal surgical cytoreduction rates between BRCA‐positive patients and BRCA‐negative patients. The results showed that BRCA mutation carriers were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at a younger age than the age at which nonmutation carriers were diagnosed. In addition, BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to be in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III‐IV, and the pathological grade was commonly grade 3. The pathological type of BRCA mutation carriers was more likely to be high‐grade serous carcinoma. Patients with BRCA mutations had higher response rates to platinum‐based chemotherapy than the noncarriers. However, patients in both groups had equivalent rates of surgical cytoreduction, and BRCA‐positive patients had longer overall survival (OS) time (HR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.73; p &lt; 0.001) and longer progression‐free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.82; p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionBRCA mutations appear to be associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with ovarian cancer. However, we did not find any difference in the surgical resection rate between participants in the two groups.

2Papers
2Collaborators